Risks and Opportunities of Reforms Putting Primary Care in the Driver’s Seat; Comment on “Governance, Government, and the Search for New Provider Models”

Document Type : Commentary


Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden


Recognizing the advantages of primary care as a means of improving the entire health system, this text comments on reforms of publicly funded primary health centers, and the rapid development of private forprofit providers in Sweden. Many goals and expectations are connected to such reforms, which equally require critical analyses of scarce resources, professional trust/motivation and business logic in the wake of freedom and control of ownership and management. In line with Saltman and Duran, this article calls for research and a methodologically developed approach to capture everyday practice in-depth and how regulation, market incentives and patient demands are met by professionals and primary care leaders.


Main Subjects

  1. Saltman RB, Duran A. Governance, government, and the search for new provider models. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(1):33-42. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.198
  2. Anell A. Choice and privatisation in Swedish primary care. Health Economics, Policy and Law. 2011;6:549-569. doi:10.1017/s1744133110000216
  3. Anell A, Glenngard AH, Merkur SM. Sweden: Health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012;14(5):1-159.
  4. Health Consumer Powerhouse. Outcomes in EHCI; Report 2015.
  5. Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Primary care: current problems and proposed solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(5):799-805. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0026
  6. Saltman RB, Rico A, Boerma W, eds. Primary Care in the Driver’s Seat? Organizational Reform in European Primary Care. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2006.
  7. Swedish Competition Authority. Establishment and competition among primary care centers – about quality driven competition and financial conditions; 2014.
  8. Paris V, Devaux M, Wei L. Health Systems institutional characteristics: a survey of 29 OECD countries. OECD Health Working Papers. OECD Publishing; 2010.
  9. Isaksson D, Blomqvist P, Winblad U. Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:28. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1259-z
  10. Andersson Bäck M, Calltorp J, Saltman RB. Privatization in Swedish health care. Working paper, Swedish Forum on Health Policy. Stockholm; 2013.
  11. Andersson Bäck M, Calltorp J. The Norrtaelje model: a unique model for integrated health and social care in Sweden. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15:e016. doi:10.5334/ijic.2244
  12. Bevan G, Hood C. What’s measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Adm. 2006;84(3):517-538. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x
  13. Anell A. The Public–Private Pendulum—Patient Choice and Equity in Sweden. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):1-4. doi:10.1056/nejmp1411430
  14. Kjellström S, Avby G, Andersson Bäck M. Financial Incentives & Motivation.  The International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, Improvement Science Symposium; April 12-15, 2016 Gothenburg.