Critical Global Health: Responding to Poverty, Inequality and Climate Change; Comment on “Politics, Power, Poverty and Global Health: Systems and Frames”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University, London, UK

Abstract

A recent article by Sol Benatar calls on the global health community to reassess its approach to twin crises of global poverty and climate change. I build on his article by challenging mainstream narratives that claim satisfactory progress in efforts to reduce poverty and improve health for all, and arguing that any eradication of poverty that is consistent with environmental sustainability will require a more explicit emphasis on the redistribution of power and wealth. I suggest that the global health community has been largely socialised into accepting that progress and future solutions can be attained through more neoliberal development, technological advancement and philanthropic endeavour and that a more critical global health is required. I propose three steps that the global health community should take: first, create more space for the social, political and political sciences within global health; second, be more prepared to act politically and challenge power; and third, do more to bridge the global-local divide in recognition of the fact that progressive change requires mobilisation from the bottom-up in conjunction with top-down policy and legislative change.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Benatar S. Politics, power, poverty and global health: systems and frames. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(10):599-604. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.101
  2. Ferreira F, Jolliffe DM, Prydz P. The international poverty line has just been raised to $1.90 a day, but global poverty is basically unchanged. http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/international-poverty-line-has-just-been-raised-190-day-global-poverty-basically-unchanged-how-even. Published 2015.
  3. Cruz M, Foster J, Quillin B, Schellekens P. Ending Extreme Poverty and Sharing Prosperity: Progress and Policies. Washington DC: World Bank; 2015. http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/109701443800596288/PRN03Oct2015TwinGoals.pdf
  4. Reddy SG, Pogge T. How Not to Count the Poor. In: Anand S, Segal P, Stiglitz J, eds. Debates in the Measurement of Global Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  5. Kochhar R. A global middle class is more promise than reality: from 2001 to 2011, nearly 700 million step out of poverty, but most only barely. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015. http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/07/08/a-global-middle-class-is-more-promise-than-reality. Accessed January 21, 2016.
  6. Farmer P. An Anthropology of Structural Violence. Curr Anthropol.  2004;45(3):305-325.
  7. Fraser N. Injustice at intersecting scales: on ‘social exclusion’ and the ‘global poor.’ European Journal of Social Theory. 2010;13(3):363-371. doi:10.1177/1368431010371758
  8. Jamison DT, Summers LH, Alleyne G, et al. Global health 2035: a world converging within a generation. Lancet 2013;382(9908):1898-1955. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(13)62105-4
  9. Democracy in sub-Saharan Africa.  The Economist. 2011. http://www.economist.com/node/21531010
  10. Mobile phones transform life of India’s poor.  Financial Times. 2010. https://www.ft.com/content/5f8524f2-044c-11df-8603-00144feabdc0
  11. How economic freedom is good if you're poor. The Economist. 2012. http://www.economist.com/node/1193830
  12. Chan M. WHO Director-General addresses event on climate change and health.  WHO website. http://www.who.int/dg/speeches/2015/climate-change-paris/en/. Published December 8, 1015.
  13. Labonté R. Health promotion in an age of normative equity and rampant inequality. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(12):675-682. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.95
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 6, Issue 9
September 2017
Pages 539-541

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 21 November 2016
  • Revise Date: 03 January 2017
  • Accept Date: 31 December 2016

Share

How to cite

Statistics