Passed the Age of Puberty: Organizational Networks as a Way to Get Things Done in the Health Field; Comment on “Evaluating Global Health Partnerships: A Case Study of a Gavi HPV Vaccine Application Process in Uganda”

Document Type : Commentary


1 Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

2 WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria


In this commentary I will demonstrate that the case study of Uganda’s Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine application partnership provides an excellent example of widening our lens by evaluating the successful HP vaccine coverage from a network-centric perspective. That implies that the organizational network is seen as the locus of production and that network theories become indispensable to analyze the situation at hand. The case study is, as said, an excellent example of how this can be done and my comments have to be read as an endorsement and a broadening of the discussion of what Carol Kamya and colleagues have presented. It is demonstrated that an organizational network approach can be considered a serious and mature way in understanding public health issues.


Main Subjects

"Watch the Video Summary"

  1. Kamya C, Shearer J, Asiimwe G, et al. Evaluating global health partnerships: a case study of a Gavi HPV vaccine application process in Uganda. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; Forthcoming. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.137
  2. Mandell M, Keast R, Chamberlain D. Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language. Public Management Review. 2017;19(3):326-341. 10.1080/14719037.2016.1209232
  3. Vangen S, Hayes JP,  Cornforth C. Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review. 2015;17(9);1237-1260. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.903658
  4. Kickbusch I, Cassels A,  Liu A. New directions in Governing the Global Health Domain. Leadership Challenges for WHO. Global Health Centre Working Paper No. 13. Geneva: Global Health Centre; 2016.
  5. Provan KG, Kenis P. Modes of network governance: structure, management, and effectiveness. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2016;18(2):229-252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
  6. Raab J, Kenis P. Heading toward a society of networks: empirical developments and theoretical challenges. Journal of Management Inquiry. 2009;18(3):198-210. doi:10.1177/1056492609337493
  7. Provan KG, Veazie MA, Staten LK, Teufel‐Shone NI. The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Adm Rev. 2005;65(5):603-613. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x
  8. Thomson AM, Perry JL. Collaboration processes: inside the black box. Public Adm Rev. 2006;66:20-32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
  9. Raab J, Mannak RS, Cambré B. Combining structure, governance, and context: a configurational approach to network effectiveness. J Public Adm Res Theory. 2013;25(2):479-511. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut039
  • Receive Date: 12 February 2017
  • Revise Date: 03 May 2017
  • Accept Date: 20 April 2017
  • First Publish Date: 01 November 2017