State Support: A Prerequisite for Global Health Network Effectiveness; Comment on “Four Challenges that Global Health Networks Face”

Document Type : Commentary


Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK


Shiffman recently summarized lessons for network effectiveness from an impressive collection of case-studies. However, in common with most global health governance analysis in recent years, Shiffman underplays the important role of states in these global networks. As the body which decides and signs international agreements, often provides the resourcing, and is responsible for implementing initiatives all contributing to the prioritization of certain issues over others, state recognition and support is a prerequisite to enabling and determining global health networks’ success. The role of states deserves greater attention, analysis and consideration. We reflect upon the underappreciated role of the state within the current discourse on global health. We present the tobacco case study to illustrate the decisive role of states in determining progress for global health networks, and highlight how states use a legitimacy loop to gain legitimacy from and provide legitimacy to global health networks. Moving forward in assessing global health networks’ effectiveness, further investigating state support as a determinant of success will be critical. Understanding how global health networks and states interact and evolve to shape and support their respective interests should be a focus for future research.


Main Subjects

  1. Shiffman J. Four challenges that global health networks face. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; 6 (4):183-189. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.14
  2. Shiffman J. Networks and Global Health Governance: Introductory Editorial for Health Policy and Planning Supplement on the Emergence and Effectiveness of Global Health Networks. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(1): i1-i2. doi:10.1093/heapol/czw019
  3. Weiss TG. Global Governance: Why What Whither. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity; 2013.
  4. Rosenau JN, Czempiel E, eds. Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  5. Fidler D. SARS, Governance and the Globalization of Disease. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
  6. Marsh D, Smith N, Hothi N, Globalization and the State. In: Lister M, Marsh D, eds. The State: Theories and Issues. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
  7. McInnes C, Lee K. Global Health and International Relations. Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.
  8. Ricci J. Global Health Governance and the State: Premature Claims of a Post-International Framework. Global Health Governance. 2009;3(1):1-18. 
  9. Stevenson M, Cooper A. Overcoming constraints of state sovereignty: global health governance in Asia. Third World Q. 2009;30(7):1379-1394. doi:10.1080/01436590903152686
  10. Rhymer W, Speare R. Countries’ response to WHO’s travel recommendations during the 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(1):10-17. doi:10.2471/BLT.16.171579
  11. Kaul I. Blending External and Domestic Policy Demands: The Rise of the Intermediary State. In: Kaul I, Condeicao P,  eds. The New Public Finance: Responding to Global Challenges. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
  12. Gneiting U. From global agenda-setting to domestic implementation: successes and challenges of the global health network on tobacco control.  Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(1):i74-i86. doi:10.1093/heapol/czv001.
  13. Yach D, Bettcher D. Globalisation of tobacco industry influence and new global responses. Tob Control. 2000;9(2):206-216.
  14. Roemer R, Taylor A, Lariviere J. Origins of the WHO Framework Convention on tobacco control. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(6):936-938.doi:10.2105/AJPH.2003.025908
  15. Yach D. The origins, development, effects, and future of the WHO Framework Convention on tobacco control: a personal perspective. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1771-1779. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62155-8
  16. Lee K, Chagas L, Novotny T. Brazil and the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: global health diplomacy as soft power. PLoS Med.  2010;7(4):e1000232. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000232.
  17. Wipfli H. The Global War on Tobacco: Mapping the World’s First Public Health Treaty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.
  18. Frenk J, Gómez-Dantés O, Moon S. From sovereignty to solidarity: a renewed concept of global health for an era of complex interdependence.  Lancet. 2014;383(9911):94-97. Doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62561-1
  19. Smith R, Lee K. Global Health Governance: We Need Innovation Not Renovation. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000275. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000275