Global Surgery – Redirecting Strategies for a Global Research Agenda; Comment on “Global Surgery – Informing National Strategies for Scaling Up Surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa”

Document Type : Commentary


Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA


More than three years have passed since the publication of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery and its recommendations on scaling up surgery in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). An important gap, the voice of the districts as well as lack of contextualized research, has been noted in its support of national surgical plans that run the risk of being at best, aspirational. Moreover, a ‘one-size-fits-all approach’ may not adequately address country-specific challenges on the ground. There is a need to redirect attention, effort, and funding in creating a global mechanism to gather baseline country information documenting every single district level government health facility’s ability and readiness to provide safe surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care using the World Health Organization (WHO) Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA) tool to aid in directing country-specific efforts in surgical systems strengthening and ensuring that a basic package of essential surgical and anesthesia services is made available to each citizen with adequate financial protection by 2030. This global mechanism will enable benchmarking, accountability, and streamlining of the work of the global surgical community to achieve true progress in scaling up surgery not only in SSA, but for the rest of the developing world.


Main Subjects

  1. Gajewski J, Bijlmakers L, Brugha R. Global surgery - informing national strategies for scaling up surgery in sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(6):481-484. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.27
  2. Carlson LC, Lin JA, Ameh EA, et al. Moving from data collection to application: a systematic literature review of surgical capacity assessments and their applications. World J Surg. 2015;39(4):813-821. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2938-8.
  3. Makasa EM. Letter to global health agency leaders on the importance of surgical indicators. Lancet. 2014;384(9956):1748. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62012-2
  4. World Health Organization. Strengthening emergency and essential surgical care and anaesthesia as a component of universal health coverage. EB135/3. Published 2014.
  5. Botman M, Meester RJ, Voorhoeve R, et al. The amsterdam declaration on essential surgical care. World J Surg. 2015;39(6):1335-1340. doi:10.1007/s00268-015-3057-x
  6. Grimes CE, Henry JA, Maraka J, Mkandawire NC, Cotton M. Cost-effectiveness of surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):252-263. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2243-y
  7. Shillcutt SD, Clarke MG, Kingsnorth AN. Cost-effectiveness of groin hernia surgery in the Western Region of Ghana. Arch Surg. 2010;145(10):954-961. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2010.208
  8. Thys S, Mwape KE, Lefevre P, et al. Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(3):e0003570. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0003570.
  9. Short R, Gurung R, Rowcliffe M, Hill N, Milner-Gulland EJ. The use of mosquito nets in fisheries: A global perspective. PloS One. 2018;13(1):e0191519. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191519.
  10. Henry J. National Surgical Capacity Study on Level 4 Public Hospitals in Kenya [In development]. Kenya Ministry of Health; 2018.
  11. Spiegel DA, Droti B, Relan P, Hobson S, Cherian MN, O’Neil K. Retrospective Review of Surgical Availability and Readiness in 8 African Countries. BMJ Open, 2017;7:e014496. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014496
Volume 7, Issue 11
November 2018
Pages 1064-1066
  • Receive Date: 02 July 2018
  • Revise Date: 12 August 2018
  • Accept Date: 14 August 2018
  • First Publish Date: 01 November 2018