Implementation Research: An Efficient and Effective Tool to Accelerate Universal Health Coverage

Document Type : Editorial


1 University of Global Health Equity, Kigali, Rwanda

2 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA


Success in the implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in different settings has had variable success. Implementation research offers the approach needed to understand the variability of health outcomes from implementation strategies in different settings and why interventions were successful in some countries and failed in others. When mastered and embedded into a policy and implementation framework, the application of implementation research by countries can provide policy-makers and implementers with the knowledge necessary to work towards universal health coverage (UHC) with the effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and fidelity needed to achieve sustainable positive health outcomes for all. To achieve this goal however, work is needed by the communities of research producers and consumers to create more clarity on implementation research methodologies and to build capacity to apply them as a critical tool for countries on their path to achieving UHC.


Main Subjects

  1. Mormina M. Science, technology and innovation as social goods for development: rethinking research capacity building from sen’s capabilities approach. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019;25(3):671-692. doi:10.1007/s11948-018-0037-1
  2. West J. Advancing innovation to eliminate health disparities. Health Affairs website.  Accessed July 31, 2019. Published September 4, 2014.
  3. Pantoja T, Opiyo N, Lewin S, et al. Implementation strategies for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD011086. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011086.pub2
  4. Ciapponi A, Lewin S, Herrera CA, et al. Delivery arrangements for health systems in low‐income countries: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 9:CD011083. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011083.pub2
  5. Bauer MS, Damschroder L, Hagedorn H, Smith J, Kilbourne AM. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol. 2015;3(1):32. doi:10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9
  6. National Institutes of Health. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (R01 Clinical Trial Optional).  Published 2019.
  7. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-139
  8. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
  9. Hailemariam M, Bustos T, Montgomery B, Barajas R, Evans LB, Drahota A. Evidence-based intervention sustainability strategies: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):57. doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0910-6
  10. National Institutes of Health. Implementation science information and resources. Published 2013.
  11. Ramani S, Sivakami M, Gilson L. How context affects implementation of the Primary Health Care approach: an analysis of what happened to primary health centres in India. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;3(Suppl 3):e001381. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001381
  12. World Health Organization. What is health financing for universal coverage?
  13. EPIS Framework.  Accessed November 18, 2019.
  14. Keith RE, Crosson JC, O’Malley AS, Cromp D, Taylor EF. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15. doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0550-7
  15. Peters DH, Tran N, Adam T. Implementation Research in Health: A Practical Guide. World Health Organization website.
  16. Srikanthan A, Reid RL. Religious and Cultural Influences on Contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008;30(2):129-137. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32736-0
  17. Jalu MT, Ahmed A, Hashi A, Tekilu A. Exploring barriers to reproductive, maternal, child and neonatal (RMNCH) health-seeking behaviors in Somali region, Ethiopia. PLOS One. 2019;14(3):e0212227. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212227
  18. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res. 2011;38(2):65-76. doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
  19. Binagwaho A, Wagner C, Gatera M, Karema C, Nutt C, Ngaboa F. Achieving high coverage in Rwanda’s national human papillomavirus vaccination programme. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(8):623-628. doi:10.2471/BLT.11.097253
  20. Papoutsi C, Boaden R, Foy R, Grimshaw J. Challenges for implementation science. In: Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, eds. Challenges, Solutions and Future Directions in the Evaluation of Service Innovations in Health Care and Public Health. Vol 4. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016:121-132.
  21. Churruca K, Ludlow K, Taylor N, Long JC, Best S, Braithwaite J. The time has come: Embedded implementation research for health care improvement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(3):373-380. doi:10.1111/jep.13100
Volume 9, Issue 5
May 2020
Pages 182-184
  • Receive Date: 20 September 2019
  • Revise Date: 23 November 2019
  • Accept Date: 23 November 2019
  • First Publish Date: 01 May 2020