Re-Framing the Knowledge to Action Challenge Through NIHR Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellows; Comment on “CIHR Health System Impact Fellows: Reflections on ‘Driving Change’ Within the Health System”

Document Type : Commentary


1 Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

2 Lab4Living, Art & Design Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK


The ambition of the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Health System Impact (HSI) Fellowship initiative to modernise the health system is impressive. Embedded researchers who work between academia and nonacademic settings offer an opportunity to reframe the problem of evidence uptake as a product of a gap between those who produce knowledge and those who use it. As such, there has been an increasing interest in the potential of people in embedded research roles to work with stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge to address service challenges. In this commentary, we draw on research and experiential evidence of an embedded researcher initiative, which has similar intentions to the HSI Fellowships programme: the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship (KMRF) scheme. We outline the similarities and differences between the two schemes, and then consider the work, characteristics and skills, and organisational arrangements evident in operationalising these types of roles.


  1. Sim SM, Lai J, Aubrecht K, et al. CIHR health system impact fellows: reflections on “driving change” within the health system. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(6):325-328. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.124
  2. Vindrola-Padros C, Pape T, Utley M, et al. The role of embedded research in quality improvement: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26:70-80. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004877
  3. Ward V. Why, whose, what and how? A framework for knowledge mobilsers. Evid Policy 2017;13(3):477-497. doi: 10.1332/174426416X14634763278725
  4. Marshall M, Pagel C, French C, et al. Moving improvement research closer to practice: the Researcher-in-Residence model. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:801-805. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002779
  5. Chew S, Armstrong N, Martin G. Institutionalising knowledge brokering as a sustainable knowledge translation solution in healthcare: how can it work in practice? Evid Policy 2013;9(3):335–51. Doi: 10.1332/174426413X662734
  6. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton CR, Bucknall T, et al. Collaboration and co-production of knowledge in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4):221-223.  doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.08
  7. Cassidy CE, Burgess S, Graham ID. It’s all about the IKT approach: three perspectives on an embedded research fellowship: Comment on “CIHR health system impact fellows: reflections on ‘driving change’ within the health system.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(7):455-458. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.31
  8. Hunter DJ. Meeting the challenge of the “know-do” gap: Comment on “CIHR health system impact fellows: reflections on ‘driving change’ within the health system.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(8):498-500. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.37
  9. Evans S, Scarborough H, Supporting knowledge translation through collaborative translational research initiatives: ‘Bridging’ versus ‘blurring’ boundary-spanning approaches in the UK CLAHRC initiative. Soc Sci Med. 2014;106:119-127. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.025
  10. Bornbaum CC, Kornas K, Peirson L, et al. Exploring the function and effectiveness of knowledge brokers as facilitators of knowledge translation in health-related settings: a systematic review and thematic analysis. Implement Sci. 2015;10:162. Doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9
  11. Marshall M, Mear L, Ward V, et al. Optimising the impact of health services research on the organisation and delivery of health services: a study of embedded models of knowledge co-production in the NHS (Embedded) protocol. NIHR HS&DR Journals.
  12. Dziedzic KS, French S, Davis AM, et al. Implementation of musculoskeletal models of care in primary care setting: theory, practice, evaluation and outcomes for musculoskeletal health in high income countries. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30(3):375-397. Doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0351-9.
  13. Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Cooke J Collective Making as knowledge mobilisation: the contribution of participatory design in the co-creation of knowledge in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:585. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3397-y
  14. Wye L, Cramer H, Carey J, et al. Knowledge brokers or relationship brokers? The role of an embedded knowledge mobilisation team. Evid Policy. 2017;15(2):277-292. doi: 10.1332/174426417X15123845516148
  15. Mallidou AA, Atherton P, Chan L, et al. Core knowledge translation competencies: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3314-4
  16. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Wilkinson J, et al. Collective action for implementation: a realist evaluation of organisational collaboration in healthcare. Implement Sci. 2016;11:17. Doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0380-z
  17. Rowley E, Morriss R, Currie G, et al. Research into practice: Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire, Lincolnshire (NDL). Implement Sci 2012;7:40-51. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-40
  18. Rycroft-Malone J, Burton C, Wilkinson J, et al. Collective action for knowledge mobilisation: a realist evaluation of the collaborations for leadership in applied health research and care (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 3.44). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015.
  19. Soper B, Hinrichs S, Drabble S, et al. Delivering the aims of the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care: understanding their strategies and contributions. (Health Services and Delivery Research, No. 3.25 b). Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2015.
Volume 9, Issue 12
December 2020
Pages 531-535
  • Receive Date: 06 October 2019
  • Revise Date: 01 January 2020
  • Accept Date: 01 January 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 December 2020