COVID-19: A Window of Opportunity for Positive Healthcare Reforms

Document Type : Perspective


Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands


The current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is testing healthcare systems like never before and all efforts are now being put into controlling the COVID-19 crisis. We witness increasing morbidity, delivery systems that sometimes are on the brink of collapse, and some shameless rent seeking. However, besides all the challenges, there are also possibilities that are opening up. In this perspective, we focus on lessons from COVID-19 to increase the sustainability of health systems. If we catch the opportunities, the crisis might very well be a policy window for positive reforms. We describe the positive opportunities that the COVID-19 crisis has opened to reduce the sources of waste for our health systems: failures of care delivery, failures of care coordination, overtreatment or low-value care, administrative complexity, pricing failures and fraud and abuse. We argue that current events can canalize some very needy reforms to make our systems more sustainable. As always, political policy windows are temporarily open, and so swift action is needed, otherwise the opportunity will pass and the vested interests will come back to pursue their own agendas. Professionals can play a key role in this as well.


Main Subjects

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report 2000 - Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva: WHO; 2000. Accessed April 4, 2020.
  2. Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2012;307(14):1513-1516. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.362
  3. Shrank WH, Rogstad TL, Parekh N. Waste in the US health care system: estimated costs and potential for savings. JAMA. 2019. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.13978
  4. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):912-920. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8
  5. Stratton E, Lampit A, Choi I, Calvo RA, Harvey SB, Glozier N. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions for reducing mental health conditions in employees: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189904
  6. Schellingerhout J. Change in consultations in General Practice de Keen. North Brabant, the Netherlands; 2020.
  7. Maastricht UMC+ schaalt gebruik telemonitoring bij hartfalen op. Maastricht UMC+ website. Published 2020.
  8. Teladoc Health. Teladoc Health Sees Daily Virtual Medical Visits Up 50% in Past Week. Teladoc Health website. Published 2020.
  9. OECD. Stemming the Superbug Tide: Just A Few Dollars More. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2018.
  10. Iacobucci G. Covid-19: all non-urgent elective surgery is suspended for at least three months in England. BMJ. 2020;368:m1106. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1106
  11. Christensen CM, Grossman JH, Hwang J. The Innovator’s Prescription. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
  12. Capp R, Misky GJ, Lindrooth RC, et al. Coordination program reduced acute care use and increased primary care visits among frequent emergency care users. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(10):1705-1711. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0612
  13. Baier N, Geissler A, Bech M, et al. Emergency and urgent care systems in Australia, Denmark, England, France, Germany and the Netherlands - Analyzing organization, payment and reforms. Health Policy. 2019;123(1):1-10. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.001
Volume 9, Issue 10
October 2020
Pages 419-422
  • Receive Date: 17 April 2020
  • Revise Date: 27 April 2020
  • Accept Date: 27 April 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 October 2020