Using Open Public Meetings and Elections to Promote Inward Transparency and Accountability: Lessons From Zambia

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA

2 Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

3 Department of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

4 Department of Programs, Amref Health Africa, Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

Background
Community-led governance can ensure that leaders are accountable to the populations they serve and strengthen health systems for maternal care. A key aspect of democratic accountability is electing respective governance bodies, in this case community boards, and holding public meetings to inform community members about actions taken on their behalf. After helping build and open 10 maternity waiting homes (MWHs) in rural Zambia as part of a randomized controlled trial, we assisted community governance committees to plan and execute annual meetings to present performance results and, where needed, to elect new board members.

 
Methods
We applied a principally qualitative design using observation and analysis of written documentation of public meetings to answer our research question: how do governance committees enact inward transparency and demonstrate accountability to their communities. The analysis measured participation and stakeholder representation at public meetings, the types and purposes of accountability sought by community members as evidenced by questions asked of the governance committee, and responsiveness of the governance committee to issues raised at public meetings.

 
Results
Public meetings were attended by 6 out of 7 possible stakeholder groups, and reports were generally transparent. Stakeholders asked probing questions focused mainly on financial performance. Governance committee members were responsive to questions raised by participants, with 59% of answers rated as fully or mostly responsive (showing understanding of and answering the question). Six of the 10 sites held elections to re-elect or replace governance committee members. Only 2 sites reached the target set by local stakeholder committees of 50% female membership, down from 3 at formation. To further improve transparency and accountability, community governance committees need to engage in advance preparation of reports, and should consult with stakeholders on broader measures for performance assessment. Despite receiving training, community-level governance committees lacked understanding of the strategic purpose of open public meetings and elections, and how these relate to democratic accountability. They were therefore not motivated to engage in tactics to manage stakeholders effectively.

 
Conclusion
While open meetings and elections have potential to enhance good governance at the community level, continuous training and mentoring are needed to build capacity and enhance sustainability.

Highlights

 

Supplementary File 1 (Download)

Supplementary File 2 (Download)

Supplementary File 3 (Download)

 

Keywords


  1. Black RE, Taylor CE, Arole S, et al. Comprehensive review of the evidence regarding the effectiveness of community-based primary health care in improving maternal, neonatal and child health: 8. summary and recommendations of the Expert Panel. J Glob Health. 2017;7(1):010908. doi:10.7189/jogh.07.010908
  2. Anwari Z, Shukla M, Maseed BA, et al. Implementing people-centred health systems governance in 3 provinces and 11 districts of Afghanistan: a case study. Confl Health. 2015;9:2. doi:10.1186/1752-1505-9-2
  3. McCoy DC, Hall JA, Ridge M. A systematic review of the literature for evidence on health facility committees in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(6):449-466. doi:10.1093/heapol/czr077
  4. Mafuta EM, Dieleman MA, Hogema LM, et al. Social accountability for maternal health services in Muanda and Bolenge Health Zones, Democratic Republic of Congo: a situation analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):514. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1176-6
  5. Lodenstein E, Molenaar JM, Ingemann C, et al. “We come as friends”: approaches to social accountability by health committees in Northern Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):279. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4069-2
  6. Leppard M, Rashid S, Rahman A, Akhter M, Hashima N. Voice and Accountability: The Role of Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health Committee.; 2011. https://namati.org/resources/voice-and-accountability-role-of-maternal-neonatal-and-child-health-committee/.  Accessed May 31, 2019.
  7. Brinkerhoff DW. Accountability and health systems: toward conceptual clarity and policy relevance. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(6):371-379. doi:10.1093/heapol/czh052
  8. Hilber AM, Blake C, Bohle LF, Bandali S, Agbon E, Hulton L. Strengthening accountability for improved maternal and newborn health: a mapping of studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016;135(3):345-357. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.09.008
  9. Van Belle S, Boydell V, George AS, Brinkerhof DW, Khosla R. Broadening understanding of accountability ecosystems in sexual and reproductive health and rights: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196788. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196788
  10. Lee H-Y, Yang B-M, Kang M. Control of corruption, democratic accountability, and effectiveness of HIV/AIDS official development assistance. Glob Health Action. 2016;9(1):30306. doi:10.3402/gha.v9.30306
  11. Gilson L. Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(7):1453-1468. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00142-9
  12. Mwinga A, Moodley K. Engaging with Community Advisory Boards (CABs) in Lusaka Zambia: perspectives from the research team and CAB members. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):39. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0031-y
  13. Adams B. Public Meetings and the Democratic Process. Public Adm Rev. 2004;64(1):43-54. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00345.x
  14. Asahak S, Albrecht SL, De Sanctis M, Barnett NS. Boards of directors: assessing their functioning and validation of a multi-dimensional measure. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2425. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02425
  15. Mannion R, Davies H, Freeman T, Millar R, Jacobs R, Kasteridis P. Overseeing oversight: governance of quality and safety by hospital boards in the English NHS. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015;20(1 suppl):9-16. doi:10.1177/1355819614558471
  16. Sheaff R, Endacott R, Jones R, Woodward V. Interaction between non-executive and executive directors in English National Health Service trust boards: an observational study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):470. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1127-2
  17. Jha A, Epstein A. Hospital governance and the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(1):182-187. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0297
  18. Heald D. Varieties of Transparency. In: Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?. British Academy; 2006. doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0002
  19. Barr A, Fafchamps M, Owens T. The governance of non-governmental organizations in Uganda. World Dev. 2005;33(4):657-679. doi:10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2004.09.010
  20. Buckland-Merrett GL, Kilkenny C, Reed T. Civil society engagement in multi-stakeholder dialogue: a qualitative study exploring the opinions and perceptions of MeTA members. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017;10:5. doi:10.1186/s40545-016-0096-0
  21. Scott NA, Kaiser JL, Vian T, et al. Impact of maternity waiting homes on facility delivery among remote households in Zambia: protocol for a quasiexperimental, mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8):e022224. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022224
  22. Kaiser JL, Mcglasson KL, Rockers PC, et al. Out-of-pocket expenditure for home and facility- based delivery among rural women in Zambia : a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:411-430. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S214081
  23. Lo B, Bayer R. Establishing ethical trials for treatment and prevention of AIDS in developing countries. BMJ. 2003;327(7410):337-339. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.337
  24. Sakanga VI, Chastain P, McGlasson KL, et al. Building financial management capacity for community ownership of development initiatives in rural Zambia. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2020;35(1):36-51. doi:10.1002/hpm.2810
  25. Papp SA, Gogoi A, Campbell C. Improving maternal health through social accountability: A case study from Orissa, India. Glob Public Health. 2013;8(4):449-464. doi:10.1080/17441692.2012.748085
  26. Piotrowski SJ, Borry E. An analytic framework for open meetings and transparency. Public Adm Manag. 2010;15(1):138-176.
  27. Bjorkman M, Svensson J. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Q J Econ. 2009;124(2):735-769.
  28. Borg R, Toikka A, Primmer E. Social capital and governance: a social network analysis of forest biodiversity collaboration in Central Finland. For Policy Econ. 2015;50:90-97. doi:10.1016/J.FORPOL.2014.06.008
  29. Chriest A, Niles M. The role of community social capital for food security following an extreme weather event. J Rural Stud. 2018;64:80-90. doi:10.1016/J.JRURSTUD.2018.09.019
  30. Scott H, Danel I. Accountability for improving maternal and newborn health. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36:45-56. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.05.009
  31. Mukinda FK, Van Belle S, George A, Schneider H. The crowded space of local accountability for maternal, newborn and child health: a case study of the South African health system. Health Policy Plan. 2020;35(3):279-290. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz162
  32. Country Coordinating Mechanism Policy Including Principles and Requirements Purpose and Structure. The Global Fund website. https://www.theglobalfund.org/media/6019/core_globalfund_framework_en.pdf.  Accessed January 3, 2020. Published 2018.
  33. Schmets G, Dheepa R, Sowmya K. Strategizing National Health in the 21st Century: A Handbook. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.
  34. The World Bank Group. The World Bank Group Consultation Guidelines. Washington DC: The World Bank; 2019.
  35. Marston C, Hinton R, Kean S, et al. Community participation for transformative action on women’s, children’s and adolescents’ health. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(5):376-382. doi:10.2471/BLT.15.168492
  36. Béhague DP, Kanhonou LG, Filippi V, Lègonou S, Ronsmans C. Pierre Bourdieu and transformative agency: A study of how patients in Benin negotiate blame and accountability in the context of severe obstetric events. Sociol Heal Illn. 2008;30(4):489-510. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01070.x
  37. Sialubanje C, Massar K, Van Der Pijl MSG, Kirch EM, Hamer DH, Ruiter RAC. Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: Women’s beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia. Reprod Health. 2015;12:61. doi:10.1186/s12978-015-0051-6
  38. Scott NA, Vian T, Kaiser JL, et al. Listening to the community: using formative research to strengthen maternity waiting homes in Zambia. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194535. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194535
  39. Kurji J, Gebretsadik LA, Wordofa MA, et al. Factors associated with maternity waiting home use among women in Jimma Zone, Ethiopia: A multilevel cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e028210. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028210
  40. Marker S, Mohr M, Østergaard D. Simulation-based training of junior doctors in handling critically ill patients facilitates the transition to clinical practice: an interview study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1447-0
  41. Parker KW, DiPietro Mager NA, Aronson BD, Hart C. Using a mock board of pharmacy disciplinary hearing to teach concepts related to administrative law, addiction, empathy, and professionalism. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(11):1512-1517. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.08.009
  42. Goodridge D, Westhorp G, Rotter T, Dobson R, Bath B. Lean and leadership practices: development of an initial realist program theory. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):362. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1030-x
  43. Mianda S, Voce A. Developing and evaluating clinical leadership interventions for frontline healthcare providers: a review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):747. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3561-4
  44. Ensor T, Cooper S. Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plan. 2004;19(2):69-79. doi:10.1093/heapol/czh009
  45. Macdonald WAS. Social accountability: Nunavut perspective. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62(5):377-379.
  46. Greeson D, Sacks E, Masvawure TB, et al. Local adaptations to a global health initiative: penalties for home births in Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(9):1262-1269. doi:10.1093/heapol/czw060
  47. Walsh A, Matthews A, Manda-Taylor L, et al. The role of the traditional leader in implementing maternal, newborn and child health policy in Malawi. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(8):879-887. doi:10.1093/heapol/czy059
  48. Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the hawthorne effect. BMJ. 2015;351. doi:10.1136/bmj.h4672