Researching the Welfare Impact of Populist Radical Right Parties; Comment on “A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy

Abstract

Populist radical right (PRR) parties can impact population health through multiple mechanisms, including welfare chauvinistic policies, influencing mainstream parties, and eroding democratic norms. Rinaldi and Bekker survey the literature in order to motivate a wider research agenda. They highlight results from existing studies which show the importance of looking into the impact of PRR parties on welfare policy. This commentary considers some of the areas of research highlighted by the original article, as well as other possibilities for further research. The most important of these is to expand the sample of cases to Central and Eastern Europe, Latin America, and South East Asia.

Keywords

References

  1. Ross F. ‘Beyond Left and Right’: The New Partisan Politics of Welfare. Governance. 2000;13(2):155-183. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00127
  2. Häusermann S, Kriesi H. What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In: Beramendi P, Hausermann S, Kitschelt H, Kriesi H, eds. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. Cambridge University Press; 2015:202-230. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316163245.009
  3. Mudde C. The Populist Radical Right: A Pathological Normalcy. West Eur Polit. 2010;33(6):1167-1186. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.508901
  4. Rinaldi C, Bekker M. A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020; In Press. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.48
  5. Andersen JG, Bjørklund T. Structural Changes and New Cleavages: the Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociol. 1990;33(3):195-217. doi:10.1177/000169939003300303
  6. Esping-Andersen G. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford Univ Press; 1999.
  7. Jensen C, Petersen MB. The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care. Am J Polit Sci. 2017;61(1):68-83. doi:10.1111/ajps.12251
  8. Moise AD. The Struggle for Access to Healthcare in Eastern and Southern Europe. Published online 2019 [Thesis]. Budapest, Hungary: Central European University; 2019.
  9. de Koster W, Achterberg P, van der Waal J. The new right and the welfare state: The electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism in the Netherlands. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2013;34(1):3-20. doi:10.1177/0192512112455443
  10. Falkenbach M, Greer SL. Political parties matter: the impact of the populist radical right on health. Eur J Public Health. 2018;28:15-18. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky157
  11. Pierson P. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
  12. Immergut EM. Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
  13. Alexa J, Recka L, Votápková J, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(1):1-165.
  14. Sowada C, Sagan A, Kowalska-Bobko I, et al. Poland: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2019;21(1):1-234.
  15. Mihályi P. Spending cuts and centralization in Hungarian healthcare as a response to the international financial crisis. Int J Healthc Manag. 2012;5(3):173-186. doi:10.1179/2047970012Z.00000000025
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 10, Issue 8
August 2021
Pages 516-518

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 03 July 2020
  • Accept Date: 04 July 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics