“Conflicted” Conceptions of Conflict of Interest: How the Commercial Sector Responses to the WHO Tool on Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy Are Part of Their Standard Playbook to Undermine Public Health; Comment on “Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Managing conflict of interest (CoI) among the interested stake-holders in nutrition policy is a vexed and controversial issue. This commentary builds on Ralston and colleagues’ highly informative analysis of the 44 submissions to the World Health Organization (WHO) draft tool on preventing and managing CoI in national nutrition programs. The commentary proposes that the commercial sector actors are, by definition, too conflicted to objectively respond to the draft tool. The responses of the commercial sectors are predictable, as they mimic their positions during the prior negotiation for the development of the Framework for Engagement of Non-State Actors (FENSA). Their overall approach, and specific responses, are typical of the now standard methods of the ultra-processed food and beverage industry’s ‘corporate playbook.’ In addition, Ralston et al’s analysis raises a number of other issues, such as: why these corporations are so keen to be included in the world of multi-stakeholder partnerships, why so few member states responded to the draft tool, and problems with the term ‘private sector.’ The commentary ends with a suggestion for WHO to seek broader involvement from the 160+ member states who have yet to participate in the consultations regarding the draft tool.

Keywords

References

  1. Babic M, Fichtner J, Heemskerk EM. States versus corporations: rethinking the power of business in international politics. Int Spect. 2017;52(4):20-43. doi:10.1080/03932729.2017.1389151
  2. Elizabeth L, Machado P, Zinöcker M, Baker P, Lawrence M. Ultra-processed foods and health outcomes: a narrative review. Nutrients. 2020;12(7). doi:10.3390/nu12071955
  3. Baker P, Friel S. Food systems transformations, ultra-processed food markets and the nutrition transition in Asia. Global Health. 2016;12(1):80. doi:10.1186/s12992-016-0223-3
  4. Majnoni d’Intignano B. Épidémies industrielles. Commentaire. 1995;71:557-565.
  5. Jahiel RI. Corporation-induced diseases, upstream epidemiologic surveillance, and urban health. J Urban Health. 2008;85(4):517-531. doi:10.1007/s11524-008-9283-x
  6. Hazelwood P. Global Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships: Scaling up Public-Private Collective Impact for the SDGs. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1738Global%20Multistakeholder.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2020. Published 2015.
  7. United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda. Accessed July 11, 2020.
  8. World Economic Forum. How the Private-Sector Can Help Fund the Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/07/unlocking-private-sector-funds-for-sustainable-development. Accessed July 11, 2020. Published 2018.
  9. UN Global Compact. SDG Ambition: Introducing Business Benchmarks for the Decade of Action. Consultation draft 2020. https://www.unglobalcompact.org. Accessed July 11, 2020.
  10. Collin J, Hill SE, Kandlik Eltanani M, Plotnikova E, Ralston R, Smith KE. Can public health reconcile profits and pandemics? An analysis of attitudes to commercial sector engagement in health policy and research. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0182612. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182612
  11. Hennessy, M, Cullerton, K, Baker, P, et al. Time for complete transparency about conflicts of interest in public health nutrition research. HRB Open Research. 2019;2:1. doi:10.12688/hrbopenres.12894.1
  12. World Health Organization (WHO). Draft Approach for the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest in the Policy Development and Implementation of Nutrition Programmes at Country Level. https://www.who.int/nutrition/consultation-doi/nutrition-introductory-paper.pdf?ua=1. Accessed July 11, 2020. Published 2017.
  13. Ralston R, Hil SE, da Silva Gomes F, Collin J. Towards preventing and managing conflict of interest in nutrition policy? an analysis of submissions to a consultation on a draft WHO tool. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020; In Press. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.52
  14. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine; 1970.
  15. Oreskes N, Conway EM. Merchants of Doubt: How A Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury; 2010.
  16. World Health Organization (WHO). Framework of Engagement with Non-State Actors. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69-REC1/A69_2016_REC1-en.pdf#page=1. Accessed July 11, 2020. Published 2015.
  17. Gopakumar KM. Reform and WHO: the continuing saga of FENSA. Third World Resurgence. 2015;298/299:24-30.
  18. Seitz K. FENSA – A Fence Against Undue Corporate Influence? https://www.brot-fuer-die-welt.de/fileadmin/mediapool/2_Downloads/Fachinformationen/Sonstiges/Briefing_0916_FENSA.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2020. Published 2016.
  19. United States of America. WHO Discussion Paper, Introductory Paper and Tool EB142 Agenda Item: “Safeguarding Against Possible Conflicts of Interest (COI) in Nutrition Programs.” United States of America; 2017. https://www.who.int/nutrition/consultation-doi/united_states.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2020. Published 2017.
  20. Moodie R, Stuckler D, Monteiro C, et al. Profits and pandemics: prevention of harmful effects of tobacco, alcohol, and ultra-processed food and drink industries. Lancet. 2013;381(9867):670-679. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62089-3
  21. Wiist W. The corporate play book, health, and democracy: the snack food and beverage industry's tactics in context. In: Stuckler D, Siegel K, eds. Sick Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011:204-216.
  22. Freudenberg N. Lethal But Legal: Corporations, Consumption, and Protecting Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
  23. Moodie AR. What public health practitioners need to know about unhealthy industry tactics. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(7):1047-1049. doi:10.2105/ajph.2017.303861
  24. Pulker CE, Scott JA, Pollard CM. Ultra-processed family foods in Australia: nutrition claims, health claims and marketing techniques - CORRIGENDUM. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21(1):253. doi:10.1017/s1368980017002981
  25. Global Dairy Platform. Comments to the WHO Consultation on the Draft “Approach for the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest in the Policy Development and Implementation of Nutrition Programmes at Country Level.” https://www.who.int/nutrition/consultation-doi/global_dairy_platform.pdf. Published 2017.
  26. Brownell KD, Warner KE. The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food? Milbank Q. 2009;87(1):259-294. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x
  27. Epstein L, Landes WM, Posner RA. How business fares in the supreme court. Minn Law Rev. 2013;97(5):1431-1472.
  28. Liptak A, Rappeport A. Supreme Court Lifts Limits on Trump’s Power to Fire Consumer Watchdog. The New York Times. June 29, 2020. https://nyti.ms/31tJLCI.
  29. Sahud HB, Binns HJ, Meadow WL, Tanz RR. Marketing fast food: impact of fast food restaurants in children's hospitals. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):2290-2297. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1228
  30. World Health Organization (WHO). Informal Technical Member States Consultation. https://www.who.int/nutrition/events/2019-memberstates-consultation-COI-4Feb-report.pdf?ua=1. Accessed August 15, 2020. Published 2019.
  31. Jacobs A, Richtel M. She Took on Colombia’s Soda Industry. Then She Was Silenced. The New York Times. November 13, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/health/colombia-soda-tax-obesity.html. Accessed June 23, 2020.
  32. Taylor A, Jaccobson M. Carbonating the World: The Marketing and Health Impact of Sugar Drinks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. https://cspinet.org/sites/default/files/attachment/Final%20Carbonating%20the%20World.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2020. Published 2016.
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 11, Issue 2
February 2022
Pages 239-242

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 July 2020
  • Revise Date: 17 August 2020
  • Accept Date: 18 August 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 February 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics