Who Deserves Welfare and Who Does Not?; Comment on “A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Department of Sociology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

To what extent has the rise of populist radical right (PRR) parties in Europe affected welfare policies? Based on a scoping review of studies that address the relationship between PRR parties and welfare policy, Chiara Rinaldi and Marleen Bekker conclude that, due to their welfare chauvinistic positions, the participation of PRR parties in government coalitions is likely to have negative effects on the access to welfare provisions and health of vulnerable population groups. This short commentary reflects on this review article and critically examines its conclusion. It suggests some conceptual clarifications, raises some reservations about the review’s main claim, and provides some follow-up questions.

Keywords


  1. Rinaldi C, Bekker MPM. A scoping review of populist radical right parties' influence on welfare policy and its implications for population health in Europe. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.48
  2. Chueri J. Social policy outcomes of government participation by radical right parties. Party Politics. 2020. doi:10.1177/1354068820923496 
  3. Krause W, Giebler H. Shifting welfare policy positions: the impact of radical right populist party success beyond migration politics. Representation. 2020;56(3):331-348. doi:10.1080/00344893.2019.1661871
  4. Fenger M. The social policy agendas of populist radical right parties in comparative perspective. J Int Comp Soc Policy. 2018;34(3):188-209. doi:10.1080/21699763.2018.1483255
  5. Otjes S, Ivaldi G, Jupskås AR, Mazzoleni O. It's not economic interventionism, stupid! reassessing the political economy of radical right-wing populist parties. Swiss Polit Sci Rev. 2018;24(3):270-290. doi:10.1111/spsr.12302
  6. van der Waal J, Achterberg P, Houtman D, de Koster W, Manevska K. ‘Some are more equal than others’: economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. J Eur Soc Policy. 2010;20(4):350-363. doi:10.1177/0958928710374376
  7. van Der Waal J, de Koster W, van Oorschot W. Three worlds of welfare chauvinism? how welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice. 2013;15(2):164-181. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785147
  8. Careja R, Elmelund-Præstekær C, Baggesen Klitgaard M, Larsen EG. Direct and indirect welfare chauvinism as party strategies: an analysis of the Danish people's party. Scan Polit Stud. 2016;39(4):435-457. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.12075
  9. Chueri J. Who Deserves the Welfare? The Populist Radical Right’s Transformation of Social Policy [thesis]. Geneva: University of Geneva; 2020.
  10. Andersen JG. Restricting access to social protection for immigrants in the Danish welfare state. Benefits 2007;15(3):257-269.
  11. van Oorschot W. Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. J Eur Soc Policy. 2006;16(1):23-42. doi:10.1177/0958928706059829
  12. Chueri J. Who’s to blame: radical right populist party and mainstream parties’ roles in adoption of welfare chauvinist policies. In: Biard B, Bernhard L, Betz HG, eds. Do They Make a Difference? The Policy Influence of Radical Right Populist Parties in Western Europe. London: ECPR Press; 2019:185-222.
  13. Röth L, Afonso A, Spies DC. The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. Eur Polit Sci Rev. 2018;10(3):325-350. doi:10.1017/s1755773917000133
  14. Afonso A. Choosing whom to betray: populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes. Eur Polit Sci Rev. 2015;7(2):271-292. doi:10.1017/s1755773914000125
  15. Spies DC. Immigration and Welfare State Retrenchment: Why the US Experience is Not Reflected in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  16. Brils T, Muis J, Gaidytė T. Dissecting electoral support for the far right: a comparison between mature and post-communist European democracies. Gov Oppos. 2020:1-28. doi:10.1017/gov.2020.17
  17. Kymlicka W. Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism. Comp Migr Stud. 2015;3(1):17. doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0017-4
  18. Engbersen G. Floating populations, civic stratification and solidarity: comment on Will Kymlicka’s article: “Solidarity in Diverse Societies.” Comp Migr Stud. 2016;4(1):8. doi:10.1186/s40878-016-0029-8
  19. Kriesi H. Enlightened understanding, empowerment and leadership - three ways to enhance multiculturalism: comment on Will Kymlicka’s article: “Solidarity in Diverse Societies.” Comp Migr Stud. 2015;3(1):18. doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0019-2
  20. Soroka SN, Johnston R, Kevins A, Banting K, Kymlicka W. Migration and welfare state spending. Eur Polit Sci Rev. 2016;8(2):173-194. doi:10.1017/S1755773915000041