Adoption of Preventive Behaviour Strategies and Public Perceptions About COVID-19 in Singapore

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Background
The unprecedented severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constitutes a serious public health concern. However, adoption of COVID-19-related preventive behaviours remain relatively unknown. This study investigated predictors of preventive behaviours.
 
Methods
An analytical sample of 897 Singaporean adults who were quota sampled based on age, gender, and ethnicity were recruited through a web-enabled survey. Outcomes were adoption of, or increased frequency of preventive behaviours (avoiding social events; avoiding public transport; reducing time spent shopping and eating out; wearing a mask in public; avoiding hospitals/clinics; keeping children out of school, washing hands/using sanitisers; keeping surroundings clean; avoiding touching public surfaces; working from/studying at home). Public perceptions regarding COVID-19 (chances of getting COVID-19; perceived likelihood of COVID-19-related intensive care unit (ICU) admission; government trust; self-efficacy; perceived appropriateness of COVID-19 behaviours; response efficacy), anxiety, and demographic characteristics (age; ethnicity; marital status; education; chronic conditions; current living arrangements) were investigated as predictors of preventive behaviours adopted during COVID-19 in binomial and ordered logistic regressions.
 
Results
Though adoption of preventive behaviours among Singaporeans varied, it was, overall, high, and consistent with government recommendations. Nearly a quarter reported moderate to severe anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder 7-item – GAD-7 scores). Respondents who perceived higher COVID-19 risks, had higher government trust, higher self-efficacy, and perceived that others acted appropriately reported increased adoption/frequency of preventive measures. The strongest indicator of behavioural change was response efficacy. Respondents who were older, highly educated, anxious and married reported higher adoption/frequency of preventive measures.
 
Conclusion
To successfully influence appropriate preventive behaviours, public health messages should highlight response efficacy, increase self-efficacy, and promote trust in governmental response. Focus should be on demographic segments with low adoptions, such as younger individuals and those with low education.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmad T, Khan M, Haroon, et al. COVID-19: zoonotic aspects. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;36:101607. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101607
  2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239-1242. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648
  3. Bedford J, Enria D, Giesecke J, et al. COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1015-1018. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30673-5
  4. Singhal T. A review of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(4):281-286. doi:10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6
  5. Yi Y, Lagniton PNP, Ye S, Li E, Xu RH. COVID-19: what has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1753-1766. doi:10.7150/ijbs.45134
  6. Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J Travel Med. 2020;27(2). doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa021
  7. Lythgoe MP, Middleton P. Ongoing clinical trials for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2020;41(6):363-382. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2020.03.006
  8. Sim SW, Moey KS, Tan NC. The use of facemasks to prevent respiratory infection: a literature review in the context of the Health Belief Model. Singapore Med J. 2014;55(3):160-167. doi:10.11622/smedj.2014037
  9. Vaughan E, Tinker T. Effective health risk communication about pandemic influenza for vulnerable populations. Am J Public Health. 2009;99 Suppl 2:S324-332. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.162537
  10. Truman BI, Tinker T, Vaughan E, et al. Pandemic influenza preparedness and response among immigrants and refugees. Am J Public Health. 2009;99 Suppl 2:S278-286. doi:10.2105/ajph.2008.154054
  11. Cheong D. Coronavirus: Most workplaces to close, schools will move to full home-based learning from next week, says PM Lee. The Strait Times. April 3, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/most-workplaces-to-close-schools-will-move-to-full-home-based-learning-from-next.
  12. Wei AC. What Are Some of the New Rules at Workplaces from May 12 as Singapore Eases Tightened Covid-19 Circuit Breaker Measures. The Straits Times. May 9, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/new-rules-from-may-12-as-singapore-eases-tightened-covid-19-circuit-breaker-measures.
  13. The Straits Times. Coronavirus: Safe Distancing Rules Kick in, Failure to Sit or Queue 1m Apart from Others Could Land You a Fine or Jail Term. The Straits Times. March 27, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/coronavirus-safe-distancing-rules-kick-in-failure-to-sit-or-queue-1m-apart-from-others.
  14. Kurohi R. No More Bubble Tea Shops and other New COVID-19 Measures. AsiaOne. April 21, 2020. https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/no-more-bubble-tea-shops-and-other-new-covid-19-measures.
  15. Ling S. Netizens Condemn Travellers who Disregard Travel Advisories as it May Put Singaporeans’ Lives at Risk for COVID-19. The Online Citizen. March 25, 2020. https://www.onlinecitizenasia.com/2020/03/25/netizens-condemn-travellers-who-disregard-travel-advisories-as-it-may-put-singaporeans-lives-at-risk-for-covid-19/.
  16. The Online Citizen. COVID-19: S’pore Set to Close Workplaces Except Essential Services and Key Sectors, Implement Full Home-Based Learning Starting Next Week. The Online Citizen. April 3, 2020. https://www.onlinecitizenasia.com/2020/04/03/covid-19-spore-set-to-close-workplaces-except-essential-services-and-key-sectors-implement-full-home-based-learning-starting-next-week/.
  17. Yıldırım M, Güler A. COVID-19 severity, self-efficacy, knowledge, preventive behaviors, and mental health in Turkey. Death Stud. 2020:1-8. doi:10.1080/07481187.2020.1793434
  18. Kebede Y, Yitayih Y, Birhanu Z, Mekonen S, Ambelu A. Knowledge, perceptions and preventive practices towards COVID-19 early in the outbreak among Jimma university medical center visitors, Southwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233744. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233744
  19. Lee M, You M. Psychological and behavioral responses in South Korea during the early stages of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9). doi:10.3390/ijerph17092977
  20. Ahmad M, Iram K, Jabeen G. Perception-based influence factors of intention to adopt COVID-19 epidemic prevention in China. Environ Res. 2020;190:109995. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.109995
  21. Imhoff R, Lamberty P. A bioweapon or a hoax? the link between distinct conspiracy beliefs about the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and pandemic behavior. Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2020. doi:10.1177/1948550620934692
  22. Rogers RW. A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. J Psychol. 1975;91(1):93-114. doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
  23. Clark C, Davila A, Regis M, Kraus S. Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: an international investigation. Glob Transit. 2020;2:76-82. doi:10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003
  24. Zhong BL, Luo W, Li HM, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards COVID-19 among Chinese residents during the rapid rise period of the COVID-19 outbreak: a quick online cross-sectional survey. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(10):1745-1752. doi:10.7150/ijbs.45221
  25. Li S, Feng B, Liao W, Pan W. Internet use, risk awareness, and demographic characteristics associated with engagement in preventive behaviors and testing: cross-sectional survey on COVID-19 in the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e19782. doi:10.2196/19782
  26. Niu Z, Wang T, Hu P, et al. Chinese public engagement in preventive and intervening health behaviors during the early breakout of COVID-19: Cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8): e19995. doi:10.2196/19995
  27. Bacon AM, Corr PJ. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom: a personality-based perspective on concerns and intention to self-isolate. Br J Health Psychol. 2020. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12423
  28. Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, Latzman RD. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020:1-14. doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5
  29. Agüero F, Adell MN, Pérez Giménez A, López Medina MJ, Garcia Continente X. Adoption of preventive measures during and after the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus pandemic peak in Spain. Prev Med. 2011;53(3):203-206. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.018
  30. Davis MD, Stephenson N, Lohm D, Waller E, Flowers P. Beyond resistance: social factors in the general public response to pandemic influenza. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:436. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1756-8
  31. Stephenson N, Davis M, Flowers P, MacGregor C, Waller E. Mobilising "vulnerability" in the public health response to pandemic influenza. Soc Sci Med. 2014;102:10-17. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.031
  32. Worldometers. COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic. 2020; https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries.  Accessed August 4, 2020. 
  33. Wei TT, Khalik S. Covid-19: S'pore Rolls out More Measures Including Limiting, Where Possible, Size of Gatherings to 250 People; Workplace Distancing. The Straits Times; 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/covid-19-singapore-rolls-out-more-measures-including-limiting-where-possible-the.
  34. Government of Singapore. Corrections and Clarifications Regarding Falsehoods Published by States Times Review on COVID-19 Situation. https://www.gov.sg/article/factually-clarifications-on-falsehoods-posted-by-str-on-covid-19-situation. Published 2020.
  35. Government of Singapore. Circuit Breaker Extension and Tighter Measures: What you Need to Know. https://www.gov.sg/article/circuit-breaker-extension-and-tighter-measures-what-you-need-to-know.  Accessed May 27, 2020. Published 2020.
  36. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092-1097. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
  37. Barr M, Raphael B, Taylor M, et al. Pandemic influenza in Australia: using telephone surveys to measure perceptions of threat and willingness to comply. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:117. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-8-117
  38. Rubin GJ, Amlôt R, Page L, Wessely S. Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey. BMJ. 2009;339:b2651. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2651
  39. Singapore Department of Statistics. Population Trends 2019. https://www.singstat.gov.sg/-/media/files/publications/population/population2019.pdf. Published 2019.
  40. Government of Singapore. Updates on COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Local Situation. Government of Singapore; 2020.
  41. Goh T. Wuhan Virus: Masks Should be used Only by Those Who are Unwell. The Straits Times. January 31, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/masks-should-be-used-only-by-those-who-are-unwell.
  42. Khalik S. Wuhan Virus: Why it is Still Safe to Attend Events with Large Crowds. The Straits Times. February 1, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/why-it-is-still-safe-to-attend-events-with-large-crowds.
  43. Iau J. Over 200 People Caught for Breaching Safe Distancing Rules, 80 Didn't Wear Masks Outside Homes. The Straits Times. April 20, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/over-200-people-caught-for-breaching-safe-distancing-rules-80-didnt-wear-masks.
  44. Chee K. Coronavirus: Singapore Confirms 2 New Local Infections; 1 Appears to Have no Link to Previous Cases. The Straits Times. February 6, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/coronavirus-singapore-confirms-two-more-cases-bringing-total-to-30.
  45. Goh T. Wuhan Virus: One Patient Took Public Transport but no Cause for Alarm, Says Don. The Straits Times. January 25, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/health/one-patient-took-public-transport-but-no-cause-for-alarm-says-don.
  46. Ang P. Coronavirus: All Commuters Have to Wear Masks on Public Transport, Even After Circuit Breaker Period, Says Khaw Boon Wan. The Online Citizen. April 11, 2020. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/coronavirus-all-commuters-have-to-wear-masks-on-public-transport-says-khaw-boon-wan.
  47. Chng S, Abraham C, White MP, Skippon S. To drive or not to drive? a qualitative comparison of car ownership and transport experiences in London and Singapore. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 2019;2:100030. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2019.100030
  48. Ang J. No Plans to Close Schools for Now, Says Education Minister Ong Ye Kung. The Straits Times; 2020.
  49. Goh T, Ang J. Ong: No Need to Suspend School with Enhanced Measures. The Straits Times; 2020.
  50. Zahraei SM, Choo C, Cheema W, Cheah L. Foresight study on singapore urban mobility: methodologies and preliminary insights. In: Cardin MA, Fong S, Krob D, Lui P, Tan Y, eds. Complex Systems Design & Management Asia. Cham: Springer; 2016:135-145. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29643-2_10   
  51. Sadique MZ, Edmunds WJ, Smith RD, et al. Precautionary behavior in response to perceived threat of pandemic influenza. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(9):1307-1313. doi:10.3201/eid1309.070372
  52. Abdulkareem SA, Augustijn EW, Filatova T, Musial K, Mustafa YT. Risk perception and behavioral change during epidemics: comparing models of individual and collective learning. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0226483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226483
  53. Rudan I. A cascade of causes that led to the COVID-19 tragedy in Italy and in other European Union countries. J Glob Health. 2020;10(1):010335. doi:10.7189/jogh-10-010335
  54. Leung K, Wu JT, Liu D, Leung GM. First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1382-1393. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30746-7
  55. Khafaie MA, Rahim F. Cross-country comparison of case fatality rates of COVID-19/SARS-COV-2. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2020;11(2):74-80. doi:10.24171/j.phrp.2020.11.2.03
  56. Government of Singapore. Clarifications: Misinformation, Rumours Regarding COVID-19. Government of Singapore; 2020. https://www.gov.sg/article/covid-19-clarifications.  Accessed May 26, 2020.
  57. Carlson M, Turner M. Public Support for Democratic Governance in Southeast Asia. Asian J Polit Sci. 2008;16(3):219-239. doi:10.1080/02185370802504076
  58. Deurenberg-Yap M, Foo LL, Low YY, Chan SP, Vijaya K, Lee M. The Singaporean response to the SARS outbreak: knowledge sufficiency versus public trust. Health Promot Int. 2005;20(4):320-326. doi:10.1093/heapro/dai010
  59. Sharifirad G, Yarmohammadi P, Sharifabad MA, Rahaei Z. Determination of preventive behaviors for pandemic influenza A/H1N1 based on protection motivation theory among female high school students in Isfahan, Iran. J Educ Health Promot. 2014;3:7. doi:10.4103/2277-9531.127556
  60. Barnett DJ, Balicer RD, Lucey DR, et al. A systematic analytic approach to pandemic influenza preparedness planning. PLoS Med. 2005;2(12):e359. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020359
  61. Zhai Y. Values of deference to authority in Japan and China. Int J Comp Sociol. 2017;58(2):120-139. doi:10.1177/0020715217694078
  62. Seale H, Heywood AE, Leask J, et al. COVID-19 is rapidly changing: Examining public perceptions and behaviors in response to this evolving pandemic. PLoS One. 2020;15(6):e0235112. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235112
  63. Atchison C, Bowman L, Vrinten C, et al. Perceptions and behavioural responses of the general public during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK Adults. medRxiv. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.04.01.20050039

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 20 October 2020
  • Receive Date: 09 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 12 August 2020
  • Accept Date: 04 October 2020