Background Industry involvement in alcohol policy is highly contentious. The Drink Free Days (DFD) campaign (2018-2019) run by Public Health England (PHE), an executive agency of government, and Drinkaware, an industry-funded ‘alcohol education charity’ to encourage middle-aged drinkers to abstain from drinking on some days was criticised for perceived industry involvement. We examine the extent to which the DFD campaign was supported by local-authority Directors of Public Health (DPHs) in England – which have a statutory remit for promoting population health within their locality – and their reasons for this. Methods Our mixed-methods approach included a stakeholder mapping, online survey, and semi- structured interviews. The stakeholder mapping provided the basis for sampling survey and interview respondents. In total, 25 respondents completed the survey, and we conducted 21 interviews with DPHs and their local authority (LA) representatives. We examined survey responses, and coded free-text survey and interview responses to identify key themes.
Results While some respondents supported the DFD campaign, others did not promote it, or actively opposed it, due mainly to concerns about conflicts of interest and the legitimacy of industry involvement in the campaign. These were considered to undermine PHE’s independence and deflect attention from more important, evidence-based policy interventions such as alcohol pricing while conferring vicarious credibility on Drinkaware. We also found low levels of knowledge about alcohol-related harm, the effectiveness of different policies to address these and the policy-influencing strategies used by the alcohol industry. Conclusion The findings highlight the dangers of industry partnership and potential conflicts of interest for government agencies and the ineffectiveness of the campaigns they run at local and national levels. They demonstrate the need for caution in engaging with industry-associated bodies at all levels of government and are thus of potential relevance to studies of other health-harming industries and policy contexts.
Alcohol: no ordinary commodity--a summary of the second edition. Addiction. 2010;105(5):769-779. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02945.x
Holden C, Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:483. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-483
Hawkins B, Holden C, McCambridge J. Alcohol industry influence on UK alcohol policy: a new research agenda for public health. Crit Public Health. 2012;22(3):297-305. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.658027
Nicholls J, Greenaway J. What is the problem?: Evidence, politics and alcohol policy in England and Wales, 2010–2014. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2015;22(2):135-142. doi:10.3109/09687637.2014.993923
Miller D, Harkins C. Corporate strategy, corporate capture: food and alcohol industry lobbying and public health. Crit Soc Policy. 2010;30(4):564-589. doi:10.1177/0261018310376805
Anderson P. The beverage alcohol industry's social aspects organizations: a public health warning. Brussels: Eurocare; 2003.
McCambridge J, Kypri K, Miller P, Hawkins B, Hastings G. Be aware of Drinkaware. Addiction. 2014;109(4):519-524. doi:10.1111/add.12356
McCoy MS, Emanuel EJ. Why there are no "potential" conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1721-1722. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.2308
Maani Hessari N, van Schalkwyk MC, Thomas S, Petticrew M. Alcohol Industry CSR organisations: what can their twitter activity tell us about their independence and their priorities? a comparative analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5). doi:10.3390/ijerph16050892
Moberly T. Public health experts split over deal with industry funded charity. BMJ. 2018;362:k3942. doi:10.1136/bmj.k3942
Varvasovszky Z, Brugha R. A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy Plan. 2000;15(3):338-345. doi:10.1093/heapol/15.3.338
Hawkins B, Cassidy R. Interviewing key informants from the corporate sector. In: Lee K, Hawkins B, eds. Researching Corporations and Global Health Governance: An Interdisciplinary Guide. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2016:127-138.
Brinkmann S. Qualitative Interviewing. Oxford University Press; 2013.
Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
McCambridge J, Mialon M, Hawkins B. Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review. Addiction. 2018;113(9):1571-1584. doi:10.1111/add.14216
Adams PJ. Assessing whether to receive funding support from tobacco, alcohol, gambling and other dangerous consumption industries. Addiction. 2007;102(7):1027-1033. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01829.x
Hawkins B, Holden C. 'Water dripping on stone'? industry lobbying and UK alcohol policy. Policy Polit. 2014;42(1):55-70. doi:10.1332/030557312x655468
Anderson P, Chisholm D, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of policies and programmes to reduce the harm caused by alcohol. Lancet. 2009;373(9682):2234-2246. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60744-3
Kim Y, Park SY. Promoting public health or underlying business interests? The effectiveness (or ineffectiveness) of responsible drinking social causes by the alcohol industry versus non-profits. J Promot Manag. 2018;24(6):774-797. doi:10.1080/10496491.2017.1408524
Katikireddi SV, Hilton S. How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2015;22(2):125-134. doi:10.3109/09687637.2014.977228
Hawkins B, Holden C. Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market. Crit Policy Stud. 2013;7(1):53-71. doi:10.1080/19460171.2013.766023
Yoon S, Lam TH. The illusion of righteousness: corporate social responsibility practices of the alcohol industry. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:630. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-630
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Public-private partnerships and the politics of alcohol policy in England: the Coalition Government's Public Health 'Responsibility Deal.’ BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1477. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7787-9
Bertscher A, London L, Orgill M. Unpacking policy formulation and industry influence: the case of the draft control of marketing of alcoholic beverages bill in South Africa. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33(7):786-800. doi:10.1093/heapol/czy049
Jiang N, Ling P. Vested Interests in addiction research and policy. Alliance between tobacco and alcohol industries to shape public policy. Addiction. 2013;108(5):852-864. doi:10.1111/add.12134
Walls H, Cook S, Matzopoulos R, London L. Advancing alcohol research in low-income and middle-income countries: a global alcohol environment framework. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(4):e001958. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001958
Holden C, Hawkins B. Health policy, corporate influence and multi-level governance: the case of alcohol policy in the European Union. In: Kenworthy N, MacKenzie R, Lee K, eds. Case Studies on Corporations and Global Health Governance: Impacts, Influence and Accountability. London: Rowman & Littlefield; 2016.
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. 'Tied up in a legal mess': the alcohol industry's use of litigation to oppose minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland. Scott Aff. 2020;29(1):3-23. doi:10.3366/scot.2020.0304
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Policy windows and multiple streams: an analysis of alcohol pricing policy in England. Policy Polit. 2020;48(2):315-333. doi:10.1332/030557319x15724461566370
Hawkins B, Holden C, Eckhardt J, Lee K. Reassessing policy paradigms: a comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(1):1-19. doi:10.1080/17441692.2016.1161815
Van Mol C. Improving web survey efficiency: the impact of an extra reminder and reminder content on web survey response. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017;20(4):317-327. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1185255
Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643-653. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013
Morton LM, Cahill J, Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: a survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(3):197-203. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj036
van Gelder MM, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(11):1292-1298. doi:10.1093/aje/kwq291
Silverman D. Interpreting Qualitative Data. Sage; 2015.
Walls, H., Hawkins, B., & Durrance-Bagale, A. (2022). Local Government Stakeholder Perceptions of Legitimacy and Conflict of Interest: The Alcohol Industry and the “Drink Free Days” Campaign in England. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(8), 1505-1513. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.59
MLA
Helen Walls; Benjamin Hawkins; Anna Durrance-Bagale. "Local Government Stakeholder Perceptions of Legitimacy and Conflict of Interest: The Alcohol Industry and the “Drink Free Days” Campaign in England". International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, 8, 2022, 1505-1513. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.59
HARVARD
Walls, H., Hawkins, B., Durrance-Bagale, A. (2022). 'Local Government Stakeholder Perceptions of Legitimacy and Conflict of Interest: The Alcohol Industry and the “Drink Free Days” Campaign in England', International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(8), pp. 1505-1513. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.59
VANCOUVER
Walls, H., Hawkins, B., Durrance-Bagale, A. Local Government Stakeholder Perceptions of Legitimacy and Conflict of Interest: The Alcohol Industry and the “Drink Free Days” Campaign in England. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2022; 11(8): 1505-1513. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.59