Research in Hard-to-Reach Populations: Challenges and Strategies for Conducting Sexual Violence Studies in Applicants for International Protection Beyond the European General Data Protection Regulation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 International Centre for Reproductive Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

2 CARE-ESPRIst, Études et évaluations, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium

3 Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy, Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social Law, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

4 Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Background 
Conducting research in hard-to-reach populations such as applicants for international protection (AIPs) brings along a number of research challenges. This is especially true for sexual violence (SV) research.
 
Methods 
We developed a study design with the intent to reach AIPs in a randomized and anonymous manner including potential illiterate respondents as well, while avoiding as much bias as possible. However, this method was developed just before the entry into force of the new European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), upon which important new research challenges emerged.
 
Results 
This paper describes the original study design developed to estimate SV prevalence in AIPs in Belgium. We discuss the impact of the GDPR on the recruitment strategy applied to conduct a survey on SV in a randomly selected sample of AIPs, the adapted approach to conduct the study beyond GDPR and lessons learned for future research on sensitive topics in hard-to-reach populations such as AIPs.
 
Conclusion 
To achieve reliable prevalence numbers and provide high-quality data on SV in AIPs while respecting the GDPR regulations, studies will require an approach that has become significantly more time consuming and resourceintensive to implement.

Keywords

References

  1. De Schrijver L, Vander Beken T, Krahé B, Keygnaert I. Prevalence of sexual violence in migrants, applicants for international protection, and refugees in Europe: a critical interpretive synthesis of the evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):1979. doi:3390/ijerph15091979
  2. De Schrijver L, Krahé B, Vander Beken T, Roelens K, Keygnaert I. Vulnerabilities, consequences, and help-seeking behavior related to sexual victimization in migrants, applicants for international protection, and refugees in Europe: a critical interpretive synthesis. SocArXiv. 2021. doi:31235/osf.io/85wxh
  3. Keygnaert I, Vandeviver C, Vander Beken T, et al. UN-MENAMAIS: Understanding Mechanisms, Nature, Magnitude and Impact of Sexual Violence in Belgium. Belgium: BELSPO BRAIN-be; 2017.
  4. European Parliament - Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Brussels: European Union; 2016:1-88.
  5. Correa-Velez I, M. Gifford S. When the right to be counted doesn’t count: the politics and challenges of researching the health of asylum seekers. Crit Public Health. 2007;17(3):273-281. doi:1080/09581590701247999
  6. Sydor A. Conducting research into hidden or hard-to-reach populations. Nurse Res. 2013;20(3):33-37. doi:7748/nr2013.01.20.3.33.c9495
  7. Thomas S, Byford S. Research with unaccompanied children seeking asylum. BMJ. 2003;327(7428):1400-1402. doi:1136/bmj.327.7428.1400
  8. Benseman J. Adult Refugee Learners with Limited Literacy: Needs and Effective Responses. Auckland: English Language Partners New Zealand; 2012.
  9. Alam K, Imran S. The digital divide and social inclusion among refugee migrants: a case in regional Australia. Inf Technol People. 2015;28(2):344-365. doi:1108/itp-04-2014-0083
  10. Cook SL, Gidycz CA, Koss MP, Murphy M. Emerging issues in the measurement of rape victimization. Violence Against Women. 2011;17(2):201-218. doi:1177/1077801210397741
  11. Koss MP, Abbey A, Campbell R, et al. Revising the SES: a collaborative process to improve assessment of sexual aggression and victimization. Psychol Women Q. 2007;31(4):357-370. doi:1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00385.x
  12. Peterson ZD, Voller EK, Polusny MA, Murdoch M. Prevalence and consequences of adult sexual assault of men: review of empirical findings and state of the literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(1):1-24. doi:1016/j.cpr.2010.08.006
  13. Depraetere J, Inescu AC, De Schrijver L, Nobels A, Keygnaert I, Vandeviver C. Measuring Sexual Victimization and Perpetration in Today’s Society: Modifications to the Sexual Experiences Survey. OSF.io; 2020. doi:31235/osf.io/cgevu
  14. Boyle MH. Guidelines for evaluating prevalence studies. Evid Based Ment Health. 1998;1(2):37-39. doi:1136/ebmh.1.2.37
  15. Bijleveld CC. Methoden en Technieken van Onderzoek in de Criminologie. 3rd ed. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers; 2007.
  16. Vandeviver C, Vander Beken T. Methodological Guidelines for a Belgian National Prevalence Study of Male Victims of Sexual Violence. Brussels: Belgian Secretary of State for Equal Opportunities; 2015.
  17. Keygnaert I, Vettenburg N, Temmerman M. Hidden violence is silent rape: sexual and gender-based violence in refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(5):505-520. doi:1080/13691058.2012.671961
  18. FOD Binnenlandse Zaken - Algemene directie Instellingen en Bevolking. Wat is het Rijksregister van de natuurlijke personen? 2020; https://www.ibz.rrn.fgov.be/nl/rijksregister/faq/wat-is-het-rijksregister-van-de-natuurlijke-personen/. Accessed July 10, 2020.
  19. Sociale Zekerheid. Match-It – Databank voor het opvangnetwerk. 2020; https://www.socialsecurity.be/site_nl/civilservant/Applics/matchit/index.htm. Accessed July 10, 2020.
  20. Federal Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers - Fedasil. Reception centres. 2020; http://www.fedasil.be/en/reception-centres. Accessed June 10, 2020.
  21. Keygnaert I, Dias SF, Degomme O, et al. Sexual and gender-based violence in the European asylum and reception sector: a perpetuum mobile? Eur J Public Health. 2015;25(1):90-96. doi:1093/eurpub/cku066
  22. Kendall C, Kerr LR, Gondim RC, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(4 Suppl):S97-104. doi:1007/s10461-008-9390-4
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 11, Issue 9
September 2022
Pages 1934-1941

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 March 2021
  • Revise Date: 13 July 2021
  • Accept Date: 30 August 2021
  • First Publish Date: 31 August 2021

Share

How to cite

Statistics