Aiming for Health Equity: The role of Public Health Policy and Primary Healthcare; Comment on “Universal Health Coverage for Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Equity: Lessons From Australian Primary Healthcare"

Document Type : Commentary


Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden


This commentary refers to the article by Fisher et al on lessons from Australian primary healthcare (PHC), which highlights the role of PHC to reduce non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and promote health equity. This commentary discusses important elements and features when aiming for health equity, including going beyond the healthcare system and focusing on the social determinants of health in public health policies, in PHC and in the healthcare system as a whole, to reduce NCDs. A wider biopsychosocial view on health is needed, recognizing the importance of social determinants of health, and inequalities in health. Public funding and universal access to care are important prerequisites, but regulation is needed to ensure equitable access in practice. An example of a PHC reform in Sweden indicates that introducing market solutions in a publicly funded PHC system may not benefit those with greater needs and may reduce the impact of PHC on population health.


  1. Fisher M, Freeman T, Mackean T, Friel S, Baum F. Universal health coverage for non-communicable diseases and health equity: lessons from Australian primary healthcare. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.232
  2. Hone T, Macinko J, Millett C. Revisiting Alma-Ata: what is the role of primary health care in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? Lancet. 2018;392(10156):1461-1472. doi:1016/s0140-6736(18)31829-4
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases in the WHO European Region. WHO; 2016.
  4. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi:1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x
  5. Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. Paris: OECD; 2020.
  6. Cookson R, Mondor L, Asaria M, Kringos DS, Klazinga NS, Wodchis WP. Primary care and health inequality: difference-in-difference study comparing England and Ontario. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188560. doi:1371/journal.pone.0188560
  7. Hart JT. The inverse care law. Lancet. 1971;1(7696):405-412. doi:1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x
  8. Rechel B, Maresso A, Sagan A, Hernández-Quevedo C, Richardson E, Jakubowski E, et al. The Role of Public Health Organizations in Addressing Public Health Problems in Europe: The Case of Obesity, Alcohol and Antimicrobial Resistance. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2018.
  9. Government of Sweden. National Public Health Policy. Government of Sweden; 2018.
  10. Anell A, Glenngård AH, Merkur S. Sweden: Health System Review. WHO; 2012.
  11. Isaksson D, Blomqvist P, Winblad U. Free establishment of primary health care providers: effects on geographical equity. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:28. doi:1186/s12913-016-1259-z
  12. Burström B, Burström K, Nilsson G, Tomson G, Whitehead M, Winblad U. Equity aspects of the primary health care choice reform in Sweden - a scoping review. Int J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):29. doi:1186/s12939-017-0524-z
  13. Kullberg L, Blomqvist P, Winblad U. Market-orienting reforms in rural health care in Sweden: how can equity in access be preserved? Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):123. doi:1186/s12939-018-0819-8
  14. Vengberg S, Fredriksson M, Burström B, Burström K, Winblad U. Money matters - primary care providers' perceptions of payment incentives. J Health Organ Manag. 2021. doi:1108/jhom-06-2020-0225
  15. Tao W, Agerholm J, Burström B. The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):542. doi:1186/s12913-016-1805-8
  • Receive Date: 09 June 2021
  • Revise Date: 02 August 2021
  • Accept Date: 21 August 2021
  • First Publish Date: 01 September 2021