Background There is a growing expectation that many health organisations will implement innovations. One obstacle for innovative ideas to have an impact on the healthcare system in practice seems to be difficulties in the implementation phase. There is a lack of concretization of theoretical perspectives related to implementation of innovations. The research question answered by this article is: Which enabling factors can facilitate the specific step of moving from idea generation to implementation in a healthcare context? Methods The research was carried out with a qualitative action research methodology where the researchers took part in the innovation implementation project. The authors of this article were part of a collaborative innovation implementation project involving approximately 54 practitioners. The project was run by five stakeholders: (1) the Division of Assistive Technology in the Dalarna County Council Regional Healthcare Administration, (2) the Habilitation Division, (3) the Division for Home Care and Social Services in the municipality of Leksand, (4) Dalarna University, and (5) Uppsala University. Through a ‘Pearl growing’ technique six implementation management perspectives were, as a framework, identified and presented for the practitioners. The practitioners worked further to concretize these six perspectives. Data was collected through five workshops and collaborations between the researchers and the practitioners. Data was clustered regarding what the managers want to achieve within these six perspectives (ideal situation) and the main means for reaching this situation. Results The study underlying this article generated 35 concrete enabling factors for successful innovation implementation, distributed over the initially presented six theoretical perspectives. Conclusion Concretizing management principles into enabling factors shows, on the one hand, that the theoretical principles have practical value, but on the other that they must be adopted to the specific circumstances of each organization, and that too abstract principles can hardly be operationalized.
Commentaries Published on this Paper
Strategic Encounters in Innovation and Regulation: Healthcare Transformation in the Era of Digital Connectivity; Comment on “What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives”
Beyond Organisational Borders: The Soft Power of Innovation in the Health Sector; Comment on “What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives”
From Implementation Towards Change Management: A Plea for a Multi-stakeholder View on Innovation Implementation; Comment on “What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives”
Weintraub P, McKee M. Leadership for innovation in healthcare: an exploration. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(3):138-144. doi:15171/ijhpm.2018.122
Guarcello C, de Vargas ER. Service innovation in healthcare: a systematic literature review. Lat Am Bus Rev. 2020;21(4):353-369. doi:1080/10978526.2020.1802286
Moreira MRA, Gherman M, Sousa PSA. Does innovation influence the performance of healthcare organizations? Innovation. 2017;19(3):335-352. doi:1080/14479338.2017.1293489
Boyer R. How scientific breakthroughs and social innovations shape the evolution of the healthcare sector. In: Lechevalier S, ed. Innovation Beyond Technology: Science for Society and Interdisciplinary Approaches. Singapore: Springer; 2019:89-119. doi:1007/978-981-13-9053-1_5
Helfrich CD, Weiner BJ, McKinney MM, Minasian L. Determinants of implementation effectiveness: adapting a framework for complex innovations. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(3):279-303. doi:1177/1077558707299887
Currie G, Lockett A, El Enany N. From what we know to what we do: lessons learned from the translational CLAHRC initiative in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2013;18(3 Suppl):27-39. doi:1177/1355819613500484
Brorström S. Implementing innovative ideas in a city: good solutions on paper but not in practice? Int J Public Sect Manag. 2015;28(3):166-180. doi:1108/ijpsm-11-2014-0137
Stewart J. Implementing an innovative public sector program: the balance between flexibility and control. Int J Public Sect Manag. 2014;27(3):241-250. doi:1108/ijpsm-05-2013-0076
Piening EP. Insights into the process dynamics of innovation implementation. Public Manag Rev. 2011;13(1):127-157. doi:1080/14719037.2010.501615
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. doi:1186/s13012-015-0242-0
Choi JN, Chang JY. Innovation implementation in the public sector: an integration of institutional and collective dynamics. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(1):245-253. doi:1037/a0012994
West MA, Anderson NR. Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(6):680-693. doi:1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
Taylor A, Greve HR. Superman or the fantastic four? knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(4):723-740. doi:2307/20159795
Wadhwa A, Kotha S. Knowledge creation through external venturing: evidence from the telecommunications equipment manufacturing industry. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(4):819-835. doi:2307/20159800
Somech A, Drach-Zahavy A. Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: the role of team composition and climate for innovation. J Manage. 2013;39(3):684-708. doi:1177/0149206310394187
Birken SA, Lee SY, Weiner BJ, Chin MH, Chiu M, Schaefer CT. From strategy to action: how top managers' support increases middle managers' commitment to innovation implementation in health care organizations. Health Care Manage Rev. 2015;40(2):159-168. doi:1097/hmr.0000000000000018
Denti L. Leadership and Innovation in R&D Teams. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg; 2013.
Albury D. Creating the conditions for radical public service innovation. Aust J Public Adm. 2011;70(3):227-235. doi:1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00727.x
Grol R. Personal paper. Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice. BMJ. 1997;315(7105):418-421. doi:1136/bmj.315.7105.418
May C. A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:86. doi:1186/1472-6963-6-86
May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535-554. doi:1177/0038038509103208
May CR, Finch T, Ballini L, et al. Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:245. doi:1186/1472-6963-11-245
Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33. doi:1186/s13012-016-0398-2
Jacobs SR, Weiner BJ, Reeve BB, Hofmann DA, Christian M, Weinberger M. Determining the predictors of innovation implementation in healthcare: a quantitative analysis of implementation effectiveness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:6. doi:1186/s12913-014-0657-3
Metz A, Bartley L. Active implementation frameworks for program success. Zero Three. 2012;32(4):11-18.
Palm K, Algehed J. Exploring enablers of innovative quality development in public administration. Int J Qual Serv Sci. 2017;9(2):203-217. doi:1108/ijqss-03-2016-0021
Bolman LG, Deal TE. Modern Approaches to Understanding and Managing Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.
Badampudi D, Wohlin C, Petersen K. Experiences from using snowballing and database searches in systematic literature studies. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM); 2015. doi:1145/2745802.2745818
Reason P, Bradbury H. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. SAGE Publications; 2001.
Palm, K., & Persson Fischier, U. (2022). What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(10), 2261-2271. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.146
Klas Palm; Ulrika Persson Fischier. "What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives". International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11, 10, 2022, 2261-2271. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.146
Palm, K., Persson Fischier, U. (2022). 'What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives', International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(10), pp. 2261-2271. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.146
Palm, K., Persson Fischier, U. What Managers Find Important for Implementation of Innovations in the Healthcare Sector – Practice Through Six Management Perspectives. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2022; 11(10): 2261-2271. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.146