Six Honest Serving Matters, Teaching Us all We Need to Know About Context in Knowledge Implementation?; Comment on "Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis"

Document Type : Commentary

Author

1 Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

2 Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

While context is a vital factor in any attempt to study knowledge translation or implement evidence in healthcare, there is a need to better understand the attributes and relations that constitute context. A recent study by J. Squires et al. investigates such attributes and definitions, based on 39 stakeholder interviews across Australia, Canada, the UK, and the USA. Sixteen attributes, comprising 30 elements suggested as new findings, are proposed as the basis for a framework. This commentary argues for the need to incorporate more perspectives but also suggests an initial taxonomy rather than a framework, comprising a wider range of stakeholders and an enhanced understanding of how context elements are related at different levels and how this affects implementation processes. Aligning with person- centred care, this must include not only professionals but also patients and their next of kin, as partners in shaping more evidence-based healthcare.

Keywords


  1. The Kipling Society. http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/. Accessed July 21, 2021.
  2. Squires JE, Hutchinson AM, Coughlin M, et al. Stakeholder Perspectives of Attributes and Features of Context Relevant to Knowledge Translation in Health Settings: A Multi-Country Analysis. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.32
  3. Oxford English Dictionary. “Context.” Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/40207?rskey=TIKXEY&result=1.
  4. Estabrooks CA, Squires JE, Cummings GG, Birdsell JM, Norton PG. Development and assessment of the Alberta Context Tool. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:234. doi:1186/1472-6963-9-234
  5. McCormack B, McCarthy G, Wright J, Slater P, Coffey A. Development and testing of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(1):27-35. doi:1111/j.1741-6787.2008.00130.x
  6. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. doi:1186/s13012-015-0242-0
  7. Lynch EA, Mudge A, Knowles S, Kitson AL, Hunter SC, Harvey G. "There is nothing so practical as a good theory": a pragmatic guide for selecting theoretical approaches for implementation projects. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):857. doi:1186/s12913-018-3671-z
  8. Eldh AC, Rycroft-Malone J, van der Zijpp T, McMullan C, Hawkes C. Using nonparticipant observation as a method to understand implementation context in evidence-based practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020;17(3):185-192. doi:1111/wvn.12449
  9. Eldh AC, Årestedt L, Berterö C. Quotations in qualitative studies: reflections on constituents, custom, and purpose. Int J Qual Methods. 2020;19:1609406920969268. doi:1177/1609406920969268
  10. Eldh AC, Ehrenberg A, Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, Wallin L. Translating and testing the Alberta Context Tool for use among nurses in Swedish elder care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:68. doi:1186/1472-6963-13-68
  11. Bergström A, Skeen S, Duc DM, et al. Health system context and implementation of evidence-based practices-development and validation of the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool for low- and middle-income settings. Implement Sci. 2015;10:120. doi:1186/s13012-015-0305-2
  12. Hoben M, Mahler C, Bär M, et al. German translation of the Alberta Context Tool and two measures of research use: methods, challenges and lessons learned. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):478. doi:1186/1472-6963-13-478
  13. Eriksson L, Bergström A, Hoa DTP, Nga NT, Eldh AC. Sustainability of knowledge implementation in a low- and middle- income context: experiences from a facilitation project in Vietnam targeting maternal and neonatal health. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182626. doi:1371/journal.pone.0182626
  14. World Health Organization (WHO). Framework on Integrated, People Centred Health Services. In: 69th World Health Assembly; 2016.
  15. Wolstenholme D, Ross H, Cobb M, Bowen S. Participatory design facilitates person centred nursing in service improvement with older people: a secondary directed content analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(9-10):1217-1225. doi:1111/jocn.13385
  16. Boaz A, Robert G, Locock L, et al. What patients do and their impact on implementation. J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(2):258-278. doi:1108/jhom-02-2015-0027

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 03 November 2021
  • Receive Date: 31 August 2021
  • Revise Date: 01 November 2021
  • Accept Date: 02 November 2021
  • First Publish Date: 03 November 2021