Hospital Professionals as Dual Agents: A Superordinate Identity to Solve Interprofessional Conflicts in Hospitals?; Comment on “Dual Agency in Hospitals: What Strategies Do Managers and Physicians Apply to Reconcile Dilemmas Between Clinical and Economic Considerations?”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Business Management Department, University Rovira i Virgili, Reus, Spain

Abstract

The inherent conflict between economic and clinical considerations, between professionalism and managerialism, and between being a manager or being a clinician is widely acknowledged in the sociology of professions. The original article by Waitzberg and colleagues focused on how hospital professionals reconcile these conflicting demands. In this commentary, we argue that their assumption that the considered hospital professionals (managers, chief financial officers [CFOs], chief physicians and practising physicians) are dual agents moves on from the unproductive debates of inherent conflicts to envisage possibilities of reconciling economic and clinical considerations. We conclude that the instrumental use of the term dual agent to include “the other” (the manager or the clinician) in a superlative and inclusive category can be considered a reframing strategy to solve inherent interprofessional conflicts and to implement more collaborative models in healthcare.

Keywords


  • epublished Author Accepted Version: February 20, 2022
  • epublished Final Version: March 2, 2022
  1. Waitzberg R, Gottlieb N, Quentin W, Busse R, Greenberg D. Dual agency in hospitals: what strategies do managers and physicians apply to reconcile dilemmas between clinical and economic considerations? Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.87
  2. Waring J, Currie G. Managing expert knowledge: organizational challenges and managerial futures for the UK medical profession. Organ Stud. 2009;30(7):755-378. doi:1177/0170840609104819
  3. Exworthy M, Halford S. Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
  4. Khalili H, Price SL. From uniprofessionality to interprofessionality: dual vs dueling identities in healthcare. J Interprof Care. 2021:1-6. doi:1080/13561820.2021.1928029
  5. Noordegraaf M. From “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism: present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Adm Soc. 2007;39(6):761-785. doi:1177/0095399707304434
  6. Llewellyn S. 'Two-way windows': clinicians as medical managers. Organ Stud. 2001;22(4):593-623. doi:1177/0170840601224003
  7. Hoff TJ. Professional commitment among US physician executives in managed care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(10):1433-1444. doi:1016/s0277-9536(99)00410-4
  8. Doolin B. Enterprise discourse, professional identity and the organizational control of hospital clinicians. Organ Stud. 2002;23(3):369-390. doi:1177/0170840602233003
  9. Cascón-Pereira R, Hallier J. Getting that certain feeling: the role of emotions in the meaning, construction and enactment of doctor managers' identities. Br J Manag. 2012;23(1):130-144. doi:1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00748.x
  10. Baumeister RF. Identity: Cultural Change and the Struggle for Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
  11. Pratt MG, Rockmann KW, Kaufmann JB. Constructing professional identity: the role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(2):235-262. doi:5465/amj.2006.20786060
  12. Mintzberg H. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice Hall; 1979.
  13. Blomqvist A. The doctor as double agent: information asymmetry, health insurance, and medical care. J Health Econ. 1991;10(4):411-432. doi:1016/0167-6296(91)90023-g
  14. Gaertner SL, Rust MC, Dovidio JF, Bachman BA, Anastasio PA. The contact hypothesis: the role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Res. 1994;25(2):224-249. doi:1177/1046496494252005
  15. Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M. Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6(6):CD000072. doi:1002/14651858.CD000072.pub3

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 20 February 2022
  • Receive Date: 09 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 19 February 2022
  • Accept Date: 19 February 2022
  • First Publish Date: 20 February 2022