Successful Outcomes for Whom and for What?; Comment on “Government Actions and Their Relation to Resilience in Healthcare During the COVID-19 Pandemic in New South Wales, Australia and Ontario, Canada”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is the case of a complex global crisis that requires resilient performance across all levels of healthcare systems worldwide. The analysis of government actions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia and Canada by Smaggus et al raises the possibility for a much needed and essential debate on the notion of outcomes in the resilience in healthcare literature. Government actions have downstream effects on stakeholders’ capacity for resilience throughout the healthcare system. Yet, outcomes are fluent, multifaceted and dependant on time, space, and stakeholder perspectives. It is appropriate and timely for the resilience in healthcare field to better grasp the nuances of successful outcomes in complex adaptive systems.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Smaggus A, Long JC, Ellis LA, Clay-Williams R, Braithwaite J. Government actions and their relation to resilience in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in New South Wales, Australia and Ontario, Canada. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.67
  2. Berg SH, Akerjordet K, Ekstedt M, Aase K. Methodological strategies in resilient health care studies: an integrative review. Saf Sci. 2018;110(Pt A):300-312. doi:1016/j.ssci.2018.08.025
  3. Iflaifel M, Lim RH, Ryan K, Crowley C. Resilient health care: a systematic review of conceptualisations, study methods and factors that develop resilience. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):324. doi:1186/s12913-020-05208-3
  4. Hollnagel E. FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing; 2012.
  5. McCray J, Palmer A, Chmiel N. Building resilience in health and social care teams. Pers Rev. 2016;45(6):1132-1155. doi:1108/pr-04-2014-0095
  6. Raben DC, Viskum B, Mikkelsen KL, Hounsgaard J, Bogh SB, Hollnagel E. Application of a non-linear model to understand healthcare processes: using the functional resonance analysis method on a case study of the early detection of sepsis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2018;177:1-11. doi:1016/j.ress.2018.04.023
  7. Laugaland K, Aase K, Waring J. Hospital discharge of the elderly--an observational case study of functions, variability and performance-shaping factors. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:365. doi:1186/1472-6963-14-365
  8. Laugaland K, Aase K. The demands imposed by a health care reform on clinical work in transitional care of the elderly: a multi-faceted Janus. In: Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears RL, eds. Resilient Health Care: The Resilience of Everyday Clinical Work. Vol 2. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing; 2015.
  9. Hollnagel E, Braithwaite J, Wears RL. Resilient Health Care. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing; 2013.
  10. Berg SH, Aase K. Resilient characteristics as described in empirical studies on health care. In: Wiig S, Fahlbruch B, eds. Exploring Resilience: A Scientific Journey from Practice to Theory. Cham: Springer; 2019:79-87.
  11. Baskin RG, Bartlett R. Healthcare worker resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review. J Nurs Manag. 2021;29(8):2329-2342. doi:1111/jonm.13395

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 12 April 2022
  • Receive Date: 16 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 08 April 2022
  • Accept Date: 11 April 2022
  • First Publish Date: 12 April 2022