Ways to Improve Hospital Quality - A Health System Perspective; Comment on “Hospitals Bending the Cost Curve With Increased Quality: A Scoping Review Into Integrated Hospital Strategies”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

1 RWI – Leibniz-Institute for Economic Research, Essen, Germany

2 Leibniz Science Campus Ruhr, Essen, Germany

3 Hochschule Harz, Wernigerode, Germany

Abstract

Wackers and colleagues’ scoping review provides an informative and well-structured overview of hospital-based case studies focusing on integrated hospital strategies that seek to improve quality, while reducing or containing costs. Wackers et al take a hospital level perspective and evaluate facilitators and barriers to the successful implementation of those hospital strategies. I complement the hospital level perspective of Wackers et al with an analysis from a health system perspective. Regulations at the superordinate system level might influence decisions at the hospital level that are relevant for costs and quality of care. In this commentary, I discuss how interventions at the system level might affect hospital quality. The results suggest that especially competition between hospitals, pay for performance (PfP) initiatives in combination with publication of quality information, but also greater experience of hospital staff (as proxied by the volume outcome relationship) may provide impulses for improving quality of care.

Keywords

References

  1. Wackers E, Stadhouders N, Heil A, Westert G, van Dulmen S, Jeurissen P. Hospitals bending the cost curve with increased quality: a scoping review into integrated hospital strategies. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.168
  2. Brekke KR, Canta C, Siciliani L, Straume OR. Hospital competition in a national health service: Evidence from a patient choice reform. J Health Econ. 2021;79:102509. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102509
  3. Gaynor M, Town RJ. Competition in health care markets. In: Pauly M, McGuire T, Barros PP, Eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Vol. 9. North-Holland; 2011:499-637.
  4. Gaynor M, Ho K, Town RJ. The industrial organization of health care markets. J Econ Lit.2015;53:235-284. doi:1257/jel.53.2.235
  5. Kessler D, McClellan M. Is hospital competition socially wasteful? Q J Econ. 2000;115:577-615. doi:1162/003355300554863
  6. Gowrisankaran G, Town R. Competition, payers, and hospital quality. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1403-1422. doi:1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00185.x
  7. Bijlsma M J, Koning P W, Shestalova V. The effect of competition on process and outcome quality of hospital care in the Netherlands. De Economist. 2013;161(2):121-155. doi:1007/s10645-013-9203-7
  8. Cooper Z, Gibbons S, Skellern M. Does competition from private surgical centres improve public hospitals’ performance? evidence from the english national health service. J Public Econ. 2018;166:63–80. doi:1016/j.jpubeco.2018.08.002
  9. Or Z, Roccoco E, Touré M, Bonastre J. Impact of competition versus centralisation of hospital care on process quality: a multilevel analysis of breast cancer surgery in France. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(4):459–469. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.179
  10. Avdic D, Moscelli G, Pilny A, Sriubaite I. Subjective and objective quality and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany. J Health Econ. 2019;68:102229. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102229
  11. Bundorf MK, Chun N, Goda GS, Kessler DP. Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics. J Health Econ. 2009;28(3):718-727. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2009.01.001
  12. Wübker A, Sauerland D, Wübker A. Beeinflussen bessere Qualitätsinformationen die Krankenhauswahl in Deutschland?/Does Better Quality Information Affect Hospital Choice in Germany? Jahrb Natl Okon Stat. 2010;230(4):467-490. doi:1515/jbnst-2010-0407
  13. Eijkenaar F, Emmert M, Scheppach M, Schöffski O. Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Health Policy. 2013;110(2-3):115-130. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.008
  14. Lindenauer P K, Remus D, Roman S, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(5):486-496. doi:1056/NEJMsa064964
  15. Wübker A., Wuckel C. The impact of private for-profit hospital ownership on costs and quality of care–evidence from Germany. CESifo Econ Stud. 2019;65(4):373-401. doi:1093/cesifo/ifz005
  16. Bergman M A, Johansson P, Lundberg S, Spagnolo G . Privatization and Quality: Evidence from Elderly Care in Sweden, J Health Econ. 2016;49:109-119. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.010
  17. Hentschker C, Mennicken, R. The Volume-Outcome Relationship Revisited: Practice Indeed Makes Perfect. Health Serv Res. 2018;53(1):15–34. doi:1111/1475-6773.12696
  18. Avdic D. Improving efficiency or impairing access? Health care consolidation and quality of care: Evidence from emergency hospital closures in Sweden. J Health Econ. 2016;48: 44-60. doi:1016/j.jhealeco.2016.02.002

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 06 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 07 September 2022
  • First Publish Date: 13 September 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics