Closing the Implementation Gap; Comment on “Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Abstract

Holmström et al provide an interesting and thought-provoking contribution to a perennial problem: why, despite a vast number of applications of simulation modelling in healthcare over the past 70 years, there is still remarkably little evidence of successful implementation of model results. Their paper is a retrospective analysis of five case studies, all undertaken as consultancy, that used a blend of system dynamics (SD) modelling and action research (AR). This commentary assesses the effectiveness of this approach in achieving implementation, based on the evidence presented, and discusses some of the issues raised. These issues include a comparison of Holmström’s approach with group model building (GMB) in SD, the differences between healthcare modelling projects undertaken by (a) business consultants and (b) academics, and the challenges of undertaking ‘systematic’ reviews of the grey literature.

Keywords


  1. Wilson JC. Implementation of computer simulation projects in health care. J Oper Res Soc. 1981;32(9):825-832. doi:1057/jors.1981.161
  2. Lagergren M. What is the role and contribution of models to management and research in the health services? A view from Europe. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;105(2):257-266. doi:1016/s0377-2217(97)00233-6
  3. Fone D, Hollinghurst S, Temple M, et al. Systematic review of the use and value of computer simulation modelling in population health and health care delivery. J Public Health Med. 2003;25(4):325-335. doi:1093/pubmed/fdg075
  4. Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Patel B, Pitt M. An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. J Simul. 2009;3(3):130-140. doi:1057/jos.2009.10
  5. Tako AA, Robinson S. Is simulation in health different? J Oper Res Soc. 2015;66(4):602-614. doi:1057/jors.2014.25
  6. Darabi N, Hosseinichimeh N. System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review. Syst Dyn Rev. 2020;36(1):29-73. doi:1002/sdr.1646
  7. Carter MW, Busby CR. How can operational research make a real difference in healthcare? Challenges of implementation. Eur J Oper Res. 2022. doi:1016/j.ejor.2022.04.022
  8. Holmström P, Björk-Eriksson T, Davidsen P, Bååthe F, Olsson C. Insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.5693
  9. Vennix JAM. Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. John Wiley & Sons; 1996.
  10. Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM, van Mullekom T. Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies. Syst Dyn Rev. 2002;18(1):5-45. doi:1002/sdr.229
  11. Brailsford S. Overcoming the barriers to implementation of operations research simulation models in healthcare. Clin Invest Med. 2005;28(6):312-315.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 04 October 2022
  • Receive Date: 01 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 26 September 2022
  • Accept Date: 03 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 04 October 2022