Modelling a System to Help Improve It; Comment on “Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

1 Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden

2 Region Stockhom Healthcare, Stockhom, Sweden

Abstract

The article that this commentary considers describes the use of systems modelling in an action research (AR) project that helped improvement teams to understand the dynamics of their service as a system. This commentary seeks to make the complex article easier to understand for those unfamiliar with the subjects. It describes the advantages, disadvantages and benefits, and suggests developments of this approach for research and practice using digital technologies. The conclusion of the commentary is that dynamic system modelling combined with AR is useful for certain purposes and can produce benefits in terms of a more sophisticated understanding of systems and feedback loops for practitioners. However, there are challenges for researchers unfamiliar with AR and dynamic system modelling as well workshop facilitation expertise.

Keywords

References

  1. Holmström P, Björk-Eriksson T, Davidsen P, Bååthe F, Olsson C. Insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.5693
  2. Zocchi MS, McClelland MS, Pines JM. Increasing throughput: results from a 42-hospital collaborative to improve emergency department flow. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015;41(12):532-542. doi:1016/s1553-7250(15)41070-0
  3. Marshall DA, Burgos-Liz L, MJ IJ, et al. Applying dynamic simulation modeling methods in health care delivery research-the SIMULATE checklist: report of the ISPOR simulation modeling emerging good practices task force. Value Health. 2015;18(1):5-16. doi:1016/j.jval.2014.12.001
  4. Alanazi HO, Abdullah AH, Qureshi KN. A critical review for developing accurate and dynamic predictive models using machine learning methods in medicine and health care. J Med Syst. 2017;41(4):69. doi:1007/s10916-017-0715-6
  5. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, de Koning K. Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23):iii-157. doi:3310/hta5230
  6. Øvretveit J, Solberg-Carlsson K. Organisation and Management of Temporary Large Scale Public Services: COVID-19 Vaccination in Stockholm, Full Report. Karolinska Institutet; 2022. Available from: [email protected]. September 23, 2022.
  7. Varndell W, Fry M, Elliott D. Applying real-time Delphi methods: development of a pain management survey in emergency nursing. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):149. doi:1186/s12912-021-00661-9
  8. Aysolmaz B, Reijers HA. Animation as a dynamic visualization technique for improving process model comprehension. Inf Manage. 2021;58(5):103478. doi:1016/j.im.2021.103478
  9. Bubble chart. 2022. https://www.gapminder.org/tools/#$chart-type=bubbles&url=v1.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 04 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 10 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 12 October 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics