The Generative Mechanisms of Financial Strain and Financial Well-Being: A Critical Realist Analysis of Ideology and Difference

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

2 PolicyWise for Children and Families, Edmonton, AB, Canada

3 Centre for Health Equity Training Research & Evaluation (CHETRE), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

4 Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5 Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia

6 School of Social Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Background 
Rapid, strategic action is required to mitigate the negative and unequal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the financial well-being (FWB) of global populations. Personal financial strain (FS) worsened most significantly among systematically excluded groups. Targeted government- and community-led initiatives are needed to address these inequities. The purpose of this applied research was to identify what works for whom, under what conditions, and why in relation to community and government initiatives that promote personal and household FWB and/or address FS in high income economies.

Methods 

We employed a critical realist analysis to literature that reported on FWB/FS initiatives in high income countries. This included initiatives introduced in response to the pandemic as well as those that began prior to the pandemic. We included sources based on a rapid review. We coded academic, published literature (n=39) and practice-based (n=36) reports abductively to uncover generative mechanisms – i.e., underlying, foundational factors related to community or government initiatives that either constrained and/or enabled FWB and FS.

Results 
We identified two generative mechanisms: 1. neoliberal ideology; and, 2. social equity ideology. A third mechanism, social location (e.g., characteristics of identity, location of residence), cut across the two ideologies and demonstrated for whom the initiatives worked (or did not) in what circumstances. Neoliberal ideology (i.e., individual responsibility) dominated initiative designs, which limited the positive impact on FS. This was particularly true for people who occupied systematically excluded social locations (e.g., low-income young mothers). Social equity-based initiatives were less common within the literature, yet mostly had a positive impact on FWB and produced equitable outcomes.
 
Conclusion
Equity-centric initiatives are required to improve FWB and reduce FS among systemically excluded and marginalized groups. These findings are of relevance now as nations strive for financial recovery in the face of the ongoing global pandemic.

Keywords


  1. Brewer M, Gardiner L. The initial impact of COVID-19 and policy responses on household incomes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2020;36(Supplement_1):S187-S199.
  2. ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods. COVID-19 JobKeeper and JobSeeker impacts on poverty and housing stress under current and alternative economic and policy scenarios2020.
  3. International Monetary Fund. Policy Tracker: Policy responses to COVID-19. 2021; https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19#N. Accessed 11 May 2021.
  4. Cassells R, Duncan A. JobKeeper: The Efficacy of Australia’s First Short-Time Wage Subsidy’. Australian Journal of Labour Economics. 2020;23(2):99-128.
  5. Grundoff M. Opportunity lost: Half a million Australians in poverty without the coronavirus supplement. The Australia Institute; 2021.
  6. ACOSS. Australia's community sector & COVID-192020.
  7. Benfer EA, Vlahov D, Long MY, et al. Eviction, health inequity, and the spread of COVID-19: housing policy as a primary pandemic mitigation strategy. Journal of Urban Health. 2021;98(1):1-12.
  8. French D, Vigne S. The causes and consequences of household financial strain: A systematic review. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2019;62:150-156.
  9. Arber S, Fenn K, Meadows R. Subjective financial well-being, income and health inequalities in mid and later life in Britain. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;100:12-20.
  10. Selenko E, Batinic B. Beyond debt. A moderator analysis of the relationship between perceived financial strain and mental health. Social science & medicine. 2011;73(12):1725-1732.
  11. Salignac F, Hamilton M, Noone J, Marjolin A, Muir K. Conceptualizing financial wellbeing: An ecological life-course approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2020;21(5):1581-1602.
  12. Weida EB, Phojanakong P, Patel F, Chilton M. Financial health as a measurable social determinant of health. PloS one. 2020;15(5):e0233359.
  13. Brüggen EC, Hogreve J, Holmlund M, Kabadayi S, Löfgren M. Financial well-being: A conceptualization and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 2017;79:228-237.
  14. Prawitz A, Garman ET, Sorhaindo B, O'Neill B, Kim J, Drentea P. InCharge financial distress/financial well-being scale: Development, administration, and score interpretation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning. 2006;17(1).
  15. Netemeyer RG, Warmath D, Fernandes D, Lynch Jr JG. How am I doing? Perceived financial well-being, its potential antecedents, and its relation to overall well-being. Journal of Consumer Research. 2018;45(1):68-89.
  16. Szanton SL, Allen JK, Thorpe Jr RJ, Seeman T, Bandeen-Roche K, Fried LP. Effect of financial strain on mortality in community-dwelling older women. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2008;63(6):S369-S374.
  17. Keene DE, Lynch JF, Baker AC. Fragile health and fragile wealth: Mortgage strain among African American homeowners. Social Science & Medicine. 2014;118:119-126.
  18. Savoy EJ, Reitzel LR, Nguyen N, et al. Financial strain and self-rated health among black adults. American journal of health behavior. 2014;38(3):340-350.
  19. Lopez PJ, Neely AH. Fundamentally uncaring: The differential multi-scalar impacts of COVID-19 in the US. Social Science & Medicine. 2021;272:113707.
  20. Refaeli T, Achdut N. Financial Strain and Loneliness among Young Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Psychosocial Resources. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6942.
  21. Zwickl S, Angus LM, Qi AWF, et al. The impact of the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Australian trans community. International Journal of Transgender Health. 2021:1-11.
  22. Loomis JM. Rescaling and reframing poverty: Financial coaching and the pedagogical spaces of financial inclusion in Boston, Massachusetts. Geoforum. 2018;95:143-152. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.014
  23. BLlNDED A. BLINDED A - PAPER BLINDED FOR PEER REVIEW.
  24. Bhaskar R. A realist theory of science. New York: Routledge; 2008.
  25. Sayer A. Abstraction: a realist interpretation. In: Archer M, Bhaskar R, Collier A, Lawson T, eds. Critical realism: Essential readings1998.
  26. Dalkin SM, Greenhalgh J, Jones D, Cunningham B, Lhussier M. What’s in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation. Implementation science. 2015;10(1):1-7.
  27. Dobbins M. Rapid Review Guidebook. Hamilton, ON: National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools; 20172020.
  28. BLlNDED D. BLINDED D - PAPER BLINDED FOR PEER REVIEW.
  29. BLlNDED C. BLINDED C - PAPER BLINDED FOR PEER REVIEW.
  30. United Nations. World economic situation and prospects 2014: United Nations Publications; 2014.
  31. Saul JE, Willis CD, Bitz J, Best A. A time-responsive tool for informing policy making: rapid realist review. Implementation Science. 2013;8(1):1-15.
  32. Age UK. Never too late: Money advice and financial capability in later life2015.
  33. Anglicare. Out of the Shadows: Building resilience in our community2019.
  34. ANU Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research. Job creation and income support in remote Indigenous Australia: moving forward with a better system2016.
  35. ANZ Bank, RMIT University. Money Minded Impact Report2018.
  36. Australian Government Department of Agriculture. Internal review into the 2016 to 2020 Rural Financial Counselling Service program 2019.
  37. Berry Street Childhood Institute. Evaluation of the stand by me program2017.
  38. Brotherhood of St Laurence. Starting a future that means something to you: Outcomes from a longitudinal study of Education First Youth Foyers2019.
  39. Brunnel University London. What works? Evaluation of the DOSH financial capability programme2018.
  40. Central Queensland University. Evaluation of the My Moola Indigenous money management program as a gambling harm minimisation tool2018.
  41. Centre for Advanced Hindsight: Common Cents Lab. Applying Behavioral Science to Increase Retention in Financial Coaching Programs2017.
  42. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Financial coaching: A strategy to improve financial wellbeing2016.
  43. Good Shepherd Australia/NZ. “Outside systems control my life”: The experience of single mothers on Welfare to Work2018.
  44. Indigenous Consumer Assistance Network. Yarnin Money Report 20192019.
  45. Inside Policy. An evaluation of the Young Carer Bursary Program Final Report2017.
  46. IPSOS. The Uk Financial Capability Strategy Stakeholder Evaluation2019.
  47. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. Baby Bonuses and Early-Life Health Outcomes: Using Regression Discontinuity to Evaluate the Causal Impact of an Unconditional Cash Transfer2019.
  48. LISC. The Power of Integrated Services: New Outcomes from LISC’s Financial Opportunity Centers2020.
  49. Malatest International. Sorted Whānau Study: Financial Capability Education and Problem Gambling2016.
  50. Mathematica Center for Studying Disability Policy. Promoting Readiness of Minors in Supplemental Security Income (PROMISE): Arkansas PROMISE Process Analysis Report2018.
  51. QCoal Foundation. Ca$hed Up: Developing Financial Skills for Life2019.
  52. Social Policy Research Centre UNSW. Evaluation of Settlement Grants - Final report2017.
  53. Social Policy Research Centre UNSW. Early Review of the Specialist Homelessness Services Program2017.
  54. Social Policy Research Centre UNSW. Evaluation of the Integrated Domestic and Family Violence Service Program2018.
  55. The Financial Clinic. Building Financial Security Through Financial Coaching2015.
  56. The Financial Clinic, Branches. A Random Control Trial Of Financial Coaching2015.
  57. The Money Advice Service. 2016 outcome evaluation of debt advice funded by Money Advice Service: England & Wales2017.
  58. The Salvation Army. Relationship-based practice and service system expertise to support young people transitioning from out-of-home care in Victoria2020.
  59. The Scottish Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux. Financial Health Check Report2019.
  60. United Way. Financial Coaching Program2020.
  61. Urban Institute. Assessment of the LISCs Financial Opportunity Centres2016.
  62. Urban Institute. An Evaluation of the $tand By Me Financial Coaching Program2020.
  63. US Department of Health and Human Services. Building Savings for Success: Early Impacts from the Assets for Independence Program Randomized Evaluation. 2016.
  64. Wesley Mission. Evaluating the Wesley Mission In charge of my money financial literacy program for vulnerable populations2016.
  65. Young Enterprise. Fiver Challenge Evaluation Report2016.
  66. Ali P, O'Brien L, Ramsay I. Bankruptcy And Debtor Rehabilitation: An Australian Empirical Study. Melbourne University Law Review. 2017;40(3):688-737.
  67. Bell ON, Hole MK, Johnson K, Marcil LE, Solomon BS, Schickedanz A. Medical-Financial Partnerships: Cross-Sector Collaborations Between Medical and Financial Services to Improve Health. Academic pediatrics. 2020;20(2):166-174.
  68. Burton P, Phipps S. Economic Well-Being of Canadian Children. Canadian Public Policy-Analyse De Politiques. 2017;43(4):299-330. doi:10.3138/cpp.2017-039
  69. Cook K, McKenzie H, Natalier K. Mothers' experiences of child support: Qualitative research and opportunities for policy insight. Journal of Family Studies. 2015;21(1):57-71.
  70. Courtin E, Muennig P, Verma N, et al. Conditional Cash Transfers And Health Of Low-Income Families In The US: Evaluating The Family Rewards Experiment. Health Affairs. 2018;37(3):438-446.
  71. De Marco A, De Marco M, Biggers A, West M, Young J, Levy R. Can people experiencing homelessness acquire financial assets? Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare. 2015;42(4):55-78.
  72. Deusdad Blanca A, Comas-d'Argemir D, Dziegielewski Sophia F. Restructuring long-term care in Spain: The impact of the economic crisis on social policies and social work practice. Journal of Social Service Research. 2016;42(2):246-262.
  73. Dugan J, Booshehri LG, Phojanakong P, et al. Effects of a trauma-informed curriculum on depression, self-efficacy, economic security, and substance use among TANF participants: Evidence from the Building Health and Wealth Network Phase II. Social Science & Medicine. 2020;258:113136.
  74. Franz Chelsey E. Financial empowerment and health related quality of life in Family Scholar House participants. Journal of Financial Therapy Vol 7(1), 2016, ArtID 4. 2016;7(1).
  75. French D. Financial strain in the United Kingdom. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series. 2018;70(1):163-182. doi:10.1093/oep/gpx030
  76. Garrett CC, Keogh L, Hewitt B, Newton DC, Kavanagh AM. Young Mothers' Experiences of Receiving the Baby Bonus: A Qualitative Study. Australian Social Work. 2017;70(1):54-65. doi:10.1080/0312407x.2015.1128453
  77. Jones LE, Michelmore K. The Impact of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Household Finances. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2018;37(3):521-+. doi:10.1002/pam.22062
  78. Jones MK, Bloch G, Pinto AD. A novel income security intervention to address poverty in a primary care setting: a retrospective chart review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e014270.
  79. Kang JY. The effect of paid maternity leave on low-income families' welfare use in the US. Social Policy & Administration. 2020. doi:10.1111/spol.12618
  80. Lee B, Carlisle L. A case study of the financial benefits of a credit union's homeless prevention scheme. Public Money & Management. 2020;40(1):63-71. doi:10.1080/09540962.2019.1621050
  81. Lenhart O. Do Higher Minimum Wages Benefit Health? Evidence From the UK. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2017;36(4):828-852. doi:10.1002/pam.22006
  82. Madero-Cabib I, Fasang AE. Gendered work-family life courses and financial well-being in retirement. Advances in Life Course Research. 2016;27:43-60. doi:10.1016/j.alcr.2015.11.003
  83. McAllister A, Nylen L, Backhans M, et al. Do 'flexicurity' Policies Work for People With Low Education and Health Problems? A Comparison of Labour Market Policies and Employment Rates in Denmark, The Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom 1990-2010. International Journal of Health Services. 2015;45(4):679-705.
  84. McKenna RM, Langellier BA, Alcala HE, Roby DH, Grande DT, Ortega AN. The Affordable Care Act Attenuates Financial Strain According to Poverty Level. Inquiry. 2018;55:46958018790164.
  85. Meschede T, Chaganti S. Home for now: A mixed-methods evaluation of a short-term housing support program for homeless families. Evaluation & Program Planning. 2015;52:85-95.
  86. Messacar D, Kocourek P. Pathways to Retirement, Well-Being, and Mandatory Retirement Rules: Evidence from Canadian Reforms. Journal of Labor Research. 2019;40(3):249-275. doi:10.1007/s12122-019-09292-1
  87. Pinto AD, Da Ponte M, Bondy M, et al. Addressing financial strain through a peer-to-peer intervention in primary care. Family Practice. 2020;15:15.
  88. Pollmann-Schult M. Parenthood and Life Satisfaction in Europe: The Role of Family Policies and Working Time Flexibility. European Journal of Population-Revue Europeenne de Demographie. 2018;34(3):387-411.
  89. Praetorius Regina T, Mitschke Diane B, Avila Christopher D, Kelly Don R, Henderson J. Cultural integration through shared learning among resettled Bhutanese women. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2016;26(6):549-560.
  90. Raileanu-Szeles M. Explaining the dynamics and drivers of financial well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research. 2015;120(3):701-722.
  91. Reeves A, McKee M, Mackenbach J, Whitehead M, Stuckler D. Introduction of a National Minimum Wage Reduced Depressive Symptoms in Low-Wage Workers: A Quasi-Natural Experiment in the UK. Health Economics. 2017;26(5):639-655.
  92. Reynolds AJ, Ou SR, Mondi CF, Giovanelli A. Reducing poverty and inequality through preschool-to-third-grade prevention services. American Psychologist. 2019;74(6):653-672.
  93. Santiago AM, Galster GC, Smith RJ. Evaluating the Impacts of an Enhanced Family Self-Sufficiency Program. Housing Policy Debate. 2017;27(5):772-788. doi:10.1080/10511482.2017.1295093
  94. Schadler C, Rieder I, Schmidt EM, Zartler U, Richter R. Key practices of equality within long parental leaves. Journal of European Social Policy. 2017;27(3):247-259. doi:10.1177/0958928716685688
  95. Setty S, Skinner C, Wilson-Simmons R. Bonding time: Low-income mothers and New Jersey's family leave insurance program. Community, Work & Family. 2020;23(2):141-161.
  96. Sheehan LR, Lane TJ, Collie A. The Impact of Income Sources on Financial Stress in Workers' Compensation Claimants. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2020;27:27.
  97. Smith VA, Lindquist J, Miller KEM, et al. Comprehensive Family Caregiver Support and Caregiver Well-Being: Preliminary Evidence From a Pre-post-survey Study With a Non-equivalent Control Group. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7:122.
  98. Soldatic K, Somers K, Spurway K, van Toorn G. Emplacing Indigeneity and rurality in neoliberal disability welfare reform: The lived experience of Aboriginal people with disabilities in the West Kimberley, Australia. Environment and Planning a-Economy and Space. 2017;49(10):2342-2361. doi:10.1177/0308518x17718374
  99. Theodos B, Stacy CP, Braga B, Daniels R. Affordable Homeownership: An Evaluation of the Near-Term Effects of Shared Equity Programs. Housing Policy Debate. 2019;29(6):865-879. doi:10.1080/10511482.2019.1596965
  100. Tingey L, Larzelere F, Goklish N, et al. Entrepreneurial, Economic, and Social Well-Being Outcomes from an RCT of a Youth Entrepreneurship Education Intervention among Native American Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(7). doi:10.3390/ijerph17072383
  101. Warren A, Marchant T, Schulze D, Chung D. From economic abuse to economic empowerment: Piloting a financial literacy curriculum with women who have experienced domestic and family violence. Affilia: Journal of Women & Social Work. 2019;34(4):498-517.
  102. Wilde Rachel J, Leonard P. Youth enterprise: The role of gender and life stage in motivations, aspirations and measures of success. Journal of Education and Work. 2018;31(2):144-158.
  103. 103.Young MED, Leon-Perez G, Wells CR, Wallace SP. More Inclusive States, Less Poverty Among Immigrants? An Examination of Poverty, Citizenship Stratification, and State Immigrant Policies. Population Research and Policy Review. 2018;37(2):205-228. doi:10.1007/s11113-018-9459-3
  104. Danermark B, Ekström M, Karlsson JC. Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences: Routledge; 2019.
  105. Ferguson J. The uses of neoliberalism. Antipode. 2010;41:166-184.
  106. Ganti T. Neoliberalism. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2014;43:89-104.
  107. Graeber D. Neoliberalism an extremely brief introduction. 2013. https://levimisli.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/dg-neoliberalism-bureaucracy.pdf.
  108. Randolph B, Freestone R. Housing differentiation and renewal in middle-ring suburbs: The experience of Sydney, Australia. Urban studies. 2012;49(12):2557-2575.
  109. Guy ME, McCandless SA. Social Equity: Its Legacy, Its Promise. Public Administration Review. 2012;72(s1):S5-S13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02635.x
  110. De Vogli R. Neoliberal globalisation and health in a time of economic crisis. Social Theory & Health. 2011;9(4):311-325.
  111. Navarro V. The consequences of neoliberalism in the current pandemic. International Journal of Health Services. 2020;50(3):271-275.
  112. Poirier B, Sethi S, Haag D, Hedges J, Jamieson L. The impact of neoliberal generative mechanisms on Indigenous health: a critical realist scoping review. Globalization and health. 2022;18(1):1-17.
  113. Saunders DB. Neoliberal ideology and public higher education in the United States. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 2010;8(1):41-77.
  114. Simpson J, Albani V, Bell Z, Bambra C, Brown H. Effects of social security policy reforms on mental health and inequalities: A systematic review of observational studies in high-income countries. Social Science & Medicine. 2021:113717.
  115. De Vogli R. The financial crisis, health and health inequities in Europe: the need for regulations, redistribution and social protection. International journal for equity in health. 2014;13(1):1-7.
  116. Holz M, Mayerl J. Early days of the pandemic—The association of economic and socio-political country characteristics with the development of the COVID-19 death toll. Plos one. 2021;16(8):e0256736.
  117. Siddiqi A, Kawachi I, Keating DP, Hertzman C. A Comparative Study of Population Health in the United States and Canada during the Neoliberal Era, 1980–2008. International Journal of Health Services. 2013;43(2):193-216. doi:10.2190/HS.43.2.b
  118. Labonté R, Stuckler D. The rise of neoliberalism: how bad economics imperils health and what to do about it. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(3):312-318.
  119. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. New investments for COVID-19 impact research will support an equitable pandemic recovery for all Canadians: Government of Canada; 2022.
  120. United Nations. UN Research Roadmap for the COVID-19 Recovery Leveraging the Power of Science for a More Equitable, Resilient and Sustainable Future2020.
  121. Cardona B. The pitfalls of personalization rhetoric in time of health crisis: COVID-19 pandemic and cracks on neoliberal ideologies. Health promotion international. 2020:daaa112. doi:10.1093/heapro/daaa112
  122. Baker E, Daniels L, Pawson H, et al. Rental Insights A COVID-19 Collection. 2020.
  123. Jenkins EK, McAuliffe C, Hirani S, et al. A portrait of the early and differential mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from the first wave of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Preventive Medicine. 2021;145:106333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106333
  124. Government of Canada. The Social and Economic Impacts of COVID-19: A Six-month Update2020.
  125. Whitehead M, Taylor-Robinson D, Barr B. Poverty, health, and covid-19: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2021.
  126. Bambra C, Riordan R, Ford J, Matthews F. The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2020;74(11):964. doi:10.1136/jech-2020-214401
  127. Clay LA, Rogus S. Primary and secondary health impacts of COVID-19 among minority individuals in New York State. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(2):683.
  128. Millett GA, Jones AT, Benkeser D, et al. Assessing differential impacts of COVID-19 on black communities. Annals of Epidemiology. 2020;47:37-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.003
  129. Sturmberg JP, Tsasis P, Hoemeke L. COVID-19–an opportunity to redesign health policy thinking. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2020.
  130. Baum F, Townsend B, Fisher M, et al. Creating political will for action on health equity: practical lessons for public health policy actors. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2020.
  131. O’Sullivan D, Rahamathulla M, Pawar M. The impact and implications of COVID-19: An Australian perspective. The International Journal of Community and Social Development. 2020;2(2):134-151.
  132. Government of Alberta. Alberta's Recovery Plan2021.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 16 October 2022
  • Receive Date: 09 November 2021
  • Revise Date: 18 August 2022
  • Accept Date: 15 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 16 October 2022