The Role of the Policy Process on Health Service Reconfigurations: Evidence, Path Dependency and Framing; Comment on “‘Attending to History’ in Major System Change in Healthcare in England: Specialist Cancer Surgery Service Reconfiguration”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Historically healthcare services have largely developed on an incremental basis, with various piecemeal changes and some notable policy leaps that illustrate a punctuated equilibrium health policy process. More recently policy-makers have attempted, successfully and unsuccessfully, to reconfigure healthcare services to address perceived problems in the delivery of important services such as stroke, cancer, and trauma. Perry et al provide a welcome addition to research in this area by focusing on the importance of history in a reconfiguration of cancer services in Greater Manchester (GM). Perry et al analyse how and why this configuration was successful after several failed attempts in the past and in this commentary, I want to reflect on the explanatory role health policy analysis can contribute to studying the reconfiguration of healthcare services.

Keywords

References

  1. Fraser A, Baeza JI, Boaz A. 'Holding the line': a qualitative study of the role of evidence in early phase decision-making in the reconfiguration of stroke services in London. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):45. doi:1186/s12961-017-0207-7
  2. Perry C, Boaden RJ, Black GB, et al. "Attending to history" in major system change in healthcare in England: specialist cancer surgery service reconfiguration. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.6389
  3. Best A, Greenhalgh T, Lewis S, Saul JE, Carroll S, Bitz J. Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review. Milbank Q. 2012;90(3):421-456. doi:1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x
  4. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy. 2nd ed. New York: Pearson; 2010.
  5. Laswell HD. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House; 1936.
  6. Pierson P. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. Am Polit Sci Rev. 2000;94(2):251-267. doi:2307/2586011
  7. Snow SJ. Health and Greater Manchester in historical perspective. Representation (McDougall Trust). 2015;51(4):439-452. doi:1080/00344893.2016.1165513
  8. Jones L, Exworthy M. Framing in policy processes: a case study from hospital planning in the National Health Service in England. Soc Sci Med. 2015;124:196-204. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.046
  9. Koon AD, Hawkins B, Mayhew SH. Framing and the health policy process: a scoping review. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(6):801-816. doi:1093/heapol/czv128
  10. Carrier J, Kendall I. A policy perspective. London J Prim Care (Abingdon). 2008;1(1):45-47. doi:1080/17571472.2008.11493200
  11. Entman RM. Framing toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun. 1993;43(4):51-58. doi:1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  12. Edelman M. Contestable categories and public opinion. Polit Commun. 1993;10(3):231-242. doi:1080/10584609.1993.9962981
  13. Baeza J. Restructuring the Medical Profession: The Intraprofessional Relations of Gps and Hospital Consultants. McGraw-Hill Education; 2005.
  14. Gale AH. I stuffed their mouths with gold part II. Mo Med. 2020;117(4):296-298.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 23 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 10 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 22 October 2022
  • First Publish Date: 23 October 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics