Towards Improved Organizational Governance of Neurotrauma Surveillance; Comment on “Neurotrauma Surveillance in National Registries of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Comparative Analysis of Data Dictionaries”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2 Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

3 Department of Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

Abstract

Neurotrauma surveillance data on burden and severity of disease serves as a tool to define legislations, guide highyield risk-specific prevention, and evaluate and monitor management strategies for adequate resource allocation. In this scoping review, Barthélemy and colleagues demonstrate the gap in neurotrauma surveillance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and suggest strategies for governance in neurotrauma surveillance. We underline state accountability as well as the need for the close integration of academic and tertiary care clinical practitioners and policy-makers in addressing the public health crisis caused by neurotrauma. Additionally, multiple sources for surveillance must be included, especially in communities where victims may remain without access to formal healthcare. Finally, we offer insights into possible ways of increasing the visibility of neurotrauma on political agendas.

Keywords


  1. Barthélemy EJ, Hackenberg AEC, Lepard J, et al. Neurotrauma surveillance in national registries of low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review and comparative analysis of data dictionaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.167
  2. Ghani M, Hurrell R, Verceles AC, McCurdy MT, Papali A. Geographic, subject, and authorship trends among LMIC-based scientific publications in high-impact global health and general medicine journals: a 30-month bibliometric analysis. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11(1):92-97. doi:2991/jegh.k.200325.001
  3. Lazem M, Sheikhtaheri A. Barriers and facilitators for disease registry systems: a mixed-method study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022;22(1):97. doi:1186/s12911-022-01840-7
  4. Kanmounye US, Ammar A, Rolle M, El Ouahabi A, Park KB. Global neurosurgical workforce density-you cannot improve what you do not measure. Chin Neurosurg J. 2021;7(1):33. doi:1186/s41016-021-00252-2
  5. Quaglio G, Gallucci M, Brand H, Dawood A, Cobello F. Traumatic brain injury: a priority for public health policy. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):951-952. doi:1016/s1474-4422(17)30370-8
  6. Johnson WD, Griswold DP. Traumatic brain injury: a global challenge. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):949-950. doi:1016/s1474-4422(17)30362-9
  7. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD, et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(12):987-1048. doi:1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x
  8. Clark D, Joannides A, Adeleye AO, et al. Casemix, management, and mortality of patients rreseceiving emergency neurosurgery for traumatic brain injury in the Global Neurotrauma Outcomes Study: a prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(5):438-449. doi:1016/s1474-4422(22)00037-0
  9. Bommakanti K, Feldhaus I, Motwani G, Dicker RA, Juillard C. Trauma registry implementation in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and opportunities. J Surg Res. 2018;223:72-86. doi:1016/j.jss.2017.09.039
  10. Rosseau G, Johnson WD, Park KB, Arráez Sánchez M, Servadei F, Vaughan KA. Global neurosurgery: current and potential impact of neurosurgeons at the World Health Organization and the World Health Assembly. Executive summary of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies-World Health Organization Liaison Committee at the 71st World Health Assembly. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(4):E18. doi:3171/2018.7.focus18295
  11. Rosseau G, Johnson WD, Park KB, et al. Global neurosurgery: continued momentum at the 72nd World Health Assembly. J Neurosurg. 2020;132(4):1256-1260. doi:3171/2019.11.jns191823
  12. Cahill GL, Stankey MC, McClain CD, Park KB. World Health Assembly 73: a step forward for global surgery. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):17. doi:5334/aogh.3237
  13. Commisioners of the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery. Global Surgery 2030 Policy Brief 4: Actions and Opportunities for National Governments. Lancet Glob Commision Surg. Published online 2015:8. https://www.surgeons.org/media/21831010/Lancet-Commission-Policy-Briefs.pdf.
  14. Corley J, Barthélemy EJ, Lepard J, et al. Comprehensive policy recommendations for head and spine injury care in low- and middle-income countries. World Neurosurg. 2019;132:434-436. doi:1016/j.wneu.2019.08.240
  15. Rubiano AM, Carney N, Chesnut R, Puyana JC. Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature. 2015;527(7578):S193-197. doi:1038/nature16035
  16. Mangat HS, Wu X, Gerber LM, et al. Severe traumatic brain injury management in Tanzania: analysis of a prospective cohort. J Neurosurg. 2021:1-13. doi:3171/2020.8.jns201243

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 24 December 2022
  • Receive Date: 19 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 08 December 2022
  • Accept Date: 21 December 2022
  • First Publish Date: 24 December 2022