Comparative Politics, Political Settlements, and the Political Economy of Health Financing Reform; Comment on “Health Coverage and Financial Protection in Uganda: A Political Economy Perspective”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

Nannini et al (2021) analyze barriers to national health insurance reforms in Uganda using a political economy approach primarily rooted in stakeholder analysis. This approach is valuable,not only for its clear description of the interest-based politics at play, but also for its extension of stakeholder analysis to include consideration of the role of ideas and institutions in the policy process. However this analysis, and others like it, could be further strengthened by adding insights from two different sources. The first is the comparative politics literature on the Uganda regime. The second is a related approach while analyzes public service delivery in the context of a country’s underlying “political settlement.” Stakeholder-based approaches to health financing reform emphasize interest group conflict about the contents of policy reforms. By contrast, these complementary approaches imply distinct barriers to successful implementation of national health insurance in Uganda, rooted in the regime’s deinstitutionalization and the personalization of politics and resource allocation. They also suggest possible leverage points or avenues for progress which differ from those suggested by stakeholder analysis.

Keywords


  1. Nannini, M., Biggeri, M., Putoto, G. (2021). Health Coverage and Financial Protection in Uganda: A Political Economy Perspective. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, (), -. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.116
  2. Sparkes SP, Bump JB, Özçelik EA, Kutzin J, Reich MR. (2019) Political Economy Analysis for Health Financing Reform, Health Systems & Reform, 5:3, 183-194, DOI: 10.1080/23288604.2019.1633874
  3. Rubongoya JB. Regime Hegemony in Museveni's Uganda: Pax Musevenica by. 2007. Palgrave Macmillan. New York.
  4. Tripp, AM. 2010. Museveni’s Uganda: Paradoxes of Power in a Hybrid Regime. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienne.
  5. Kobusingye, O. 2019. The Patient: Sacrifice, genius, and greed in Uganda’s healthcare system. AuthorHouse UK.
  6. Tapscott, R. 2021. Arbitrary States: Social Control and Modern Authoritarianism in Museveni's Uganda. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Epstein, HC. 2017. Another Fine Mess: America, Uganda, and the War on Terror. Columbia Global Reports.
  8. Mwenda A. Understanding Museveni’s Grip on Uganda. The Independent. Nov 23 2010.
  9. Mwenda A: Inside Museveni’s political game. May 17 2010. The Independent.
  10. Khan M. 2010. Political Settlements and the Governance of Growth-Enhancing Institutions. Working paper, https://eprints.soas.ac.uk/9968/1/Political_Settlements_internet.pdf; accessed on January 12 2023.
  11. Bukenya B, Golooba-Mutebi F. What explains sub-national variation in maternal mortality rates within developing countries? A political economy explanation. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jul;256:113066. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113066. Epub 2020 May 19. PMID: 32470901.
  12. Croke K. Governance and Child Mortality Decline in Tanzania and Uganda, 1995-2007. Studies in Comparative International Development. 2012;47 (4): 441-463.
  13. Hickey S, Bukenya B, Matsiko H. Pockets of Effectiveness, Political Settlements and Technopols in Uganda: From State-Building to Regime Survival. 2021. ESID Working Paper No. 172. Manchester: Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre, The University of Manchester. https://www.effective-states.org/working-paper-172/, accessed on January 12 2023.
  14. Levy B. 2014. Working with the Grain: Integrating governance and growth. Oxford University Press.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 17 January 2023
  • Receive Date: 20 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 13 January 2023
  • Accept Date: 15 January 2023
  • First Publish Date: 17 January 2023