Coloniality, Elite Networks and Intersectionality: Key Concepts in Understanding Biomedical Power and Equity in Health Policy Processes; Comment on “Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 Sambodhi Research & Communications Pvt. Ltd., Noida, India

2 School of Population and Public Health and School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

3 Independent Researcher, India

4 Global Studies Ambedkar University, Delhi, India

Abstract

To understand the role of power in health policy processes in low and middle-income country (LMIC) contexts, it is necessary to engage with global and local power structures and their historical contexts. In this commentary, we outline three dimensions that shape a dominant power in health policy processes - the biomedical power. We propose that understanding the linkages between medical power and colonialism; the close connection of public health, medicine and elite networks; and the intersectionalities that shape the powers of medical professionals can offer the means to examine the biomedical hegemony in health policy processes. At the same time, a more nuanced understanding of the interaction of local powers with global funding can offer some entry points to achieving more equitable and interdisciplinary health policy processes in LMICs. 

Keywords

References

  1. Lassa S, Saddiq M, Owen J, Burton C, Balen J. Power Dynamics Among Health Professionals in Nigeria: A Case Study of the Global Fund Policy Process. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2022;11(12):2876-2885. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6097
  2. Dalglish SL, Sriram V, Scott K, Rodríguez DC. A framework for medical power in two case studies of health policymaking in India and Niger. Glob Public Health. 2019;14(4):542-554. doi:10.1080/17441692.2018.1457705
  3. Topp SM, Schaaf M, Sriram V, et al. Power analysis in health policy and systems research: a guide to research conceptualisation. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6(11):e007268. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007268
  4. Packard RM. Malaria dreams: Postwar visions of health and development in the third world. Medical Anthropology. 1997;17(3):279-296. doi:10.1080/01459740.1997.9966141
  5. Poonam Bala, Imperialism and medicine in Bengal: a socio-historical perspective, New Delhi and London, Sage Publications, 1991, pp. 174, £25.00 (81-7036-245-8 (India), 0-8039-9100-2 (US)). | Medical History | Cambridge Core. Accessed January 2, 2023. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/medical-history/article/poonam-bala-imperialism-and-medicine-in-bengal-a-sociohistorical-perspective-new-delhi-and-london-sage-publications-1991-pp-174-2500-8170362458-india-0803991002-us/FAF83876534BBCFF71336C151733A455#
  6. Healing and Harming: The “Noble Profession” of Medicine in Post-Independence India, 1947-2015. Accessed March 15, 2023. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/37372182
  7. Muraleedharan VR. Professionalising Medical Practice in Colonial South-India. Economic and Political Weekly. 1992;27(4):PE27-PE37.
  8. Mishra A, Elias MA, Sriram V. A Draconian Law: Examining the Navigation of Coalition Politics and Policy Reform by Health Provider Associations in Karnataka, India. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 2021;46(4):703-730. doi:10.1215/03616878-8970895
  9. Lloyd J. Unmasking Scientific Expertise. Issues in Science and Technology. Published August 2, 2021. Accessed January 2, 2023. https://issues.org/unmasking-scientific-expertise-covid-mills/
  10. Shiffman J, Shawar YR. Framing and the formation of global health priorities. Lancet. 2022;399(10339):1977-1990. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00584-0
  11. Parashar R, Gawde N, Gupt A, Gilson L. Unpacking the implementation blackbox using “actor interface analysis”: how did actor relations and practices of power influence delivery of a free entitlement health policy in India? Health Policy and Planning. 2020;35(Supplement_2):ii74-ii83. doi:10.1093/heapol/czaa125
  12. Rajan D, Koch K, Rohrer K, et al. Governance of the Covid-19 response: a call for more inclusive and transparent decision-making. BMJ Global Health. 2020;5(5):e002655. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002655
  13. Pol AA. Casteism Among Indian Doctors: A Critical Review. World Journal of Public Health. 2020;5(4):99. doi:10.11648/j.wjph.20200504.14
  14. Abimbola S, Asthana S, Montenegro C, et al. Addressing power asymmetries in global health: Imperatives in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(4):e1003604. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003604
  15. Olusanya JO, Ubogu OI, Njokanma FO, Olusanya BO. Transforming global health through equity-driven funding. Nat Med. 2021;27(7):1136-1138. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01422-6
International Journal of Health Policy and Management

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 19 March 2023

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 03 January 2023
  • Revise Date: 15 March 2023
  • Accept Date: 18 March 2023
  • First Publish Date: 19 March 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics