Integrated Care Policies and Politics in Belgium: Conceptual, Contextual and Governance Linkages for More Effective Integrated Care Policy Management; Comment on “Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

The study on the management of integrated care (IC) policies in Belgium from Martens et al illustrates the complex process of the political and stakeholder game in a country whose governance is changing as a result of successive state reforms. We argue that the way forward for putting health back at the centre of IC policy design and management is to improve three types of connections. First, the conceptual connections should help to articulate the different IC policies into a coherent overall picture. Second, contextual connections should allow for the adaptation of policies to different country contexts. This requires a new form of governance, ie, a place-based and adaptive form of governance. This can be developed, provided that a third connection, between the different levels of governance, is fully revised.

Keywords

References

  1. Martens M, Danhieux K, Van Belle S, et al. Integration or fragmentation of health care? Examining policies and politics in a Belgian case study. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;11(9):1668-1681. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.58
  2. Carroll A. Integrated care through the lens of a complex adaptive system. In: Amelung V, Stein V, Suter E, Goodwin N, Nolte E, Balicer R, eds. Handbook Integrated Care. Cham: Springer; 2021:595-609. doi:1007/978-3-030-69262-9_35
  3. Hughes G, Shaw SE, Greenhalgh T. Rethinking integrated care: a systematic hermeneutic review of the literature on integrated care strategies and concepts. Milbank Q. 2020;98(2):446-492. doi:1111/1468-0009.12459
  4. Van Belle S, Michielsen J, Cornu T, Martens M, Marchal B. The tale of nine Belgian health ministers and a multi-level fragmented governance system: six guiding principles to improve integrated care, responsiveness, resilience and equity; a response to the recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7848. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.7848
  5. De Winter M. Reshaping health care governance using pilot projects as public policy implementation instruments. Int Rev Public Policy. 2020;2(3):317-341. doi:4000/irpp.1422
  6. Lambert AS, Op de Beek S, Herbaux D, et al. Vers des soins (plus) intégrés en Belgique. Health Services Research (HSR). Report no. 359B. Bruxelles: Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé (KCE); 2022.
  7. Raus K, Mortier E, Eeckloo K. Challenges in turning a great idea into great health policy: the case of integrated care. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):130. doi:1186/s12913-020-4950-z
  8. Minkman MMN. Suitable scales; rethinking scale for innovative integrated care governance. Int J Integr Care. 2020;20(1):1. doi:5334/ijic.5468
  9. Ham C, Alderwick H. Place-Based Systems of Care: A Way Forward for The NHS in England. United Kingdom: The King's Fund; 2015.
  10. Human Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge in Context. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015.
  11. Marsh I, Crowley K, Grube D, Eccleston R. Delivering public services: locality, learning and reciprocity in place based practice. Aust J Public Adm. 2017;76(4):443-456. doi:1111/1467-8500.12230
  12. Blanchet K, Nam SL, Ramalingam B, Pozo-Martin F. Governance and Capacity to Manage Resilience of Health Systems: Towards a New Conceptual Framework. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(8):431-435. doi:15171/ijhpm.2017.36
  13. Gore T, Wells P. Governance and evaluation: the case of EU regional policy horizontal priorities. Eval Program Plann. 2009;32(2):158-167. doi:1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.007

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 14 December 2021
  • Revise Date: 11 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 12 July 2023
  • First Publish Date: 15 July 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics