Global Stillbirth Policy Review – Outcomes And Implications Ahead of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goal Agenda

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

2 Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

3 Division of Data, Analytics, Planning and Monitoring, UNICEF, New York City, NY, USA

4 Global Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

5 School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa

Abstract

Background 
Globally, data on stillbirth is limited. A call to action has been issued to governments to address the data gap by strengthening national policies and strategies to drive urgent action on stillbirth reduction. This study aims to understand the policy environment for stillbirths to advance stillbirth recording and reporting in data systems.

Methods 
A systematic three-step process (survey tool examination, identifying relevant study questions, and reviewing country responses to the survey and national documents) was taken to review country responses to the global 2018-2019 World Health Organization (WHO) Reproductive, Maternal, Neonatal, Child and Adolescent Health (RMNCAH) Policy Survey. Policy Survey responses were reviewed to identify if and how stillbirths were included in national documents. This paper uses descriptive analyses to identify and describe the relationship between multiple variables.

Results 
Responses from 155 countries to the survey were analysed, and over 800 national policy documents submitted by countries in English reviewed. Fewer than one-fifth of countries have an established stillbirth rate (SBR) target, with higher percentages reported for under-5 (71.0%) and neonatal mortality (68.5%). Two-thirds (65.8%) of countries reported a national maternal death review panel. Less than half (43.9%) of countries have a national policy that requires stillbirths to be reviewed. Two-thirds of countries have a national policy requiring review of neonatal deaths. WHO websites and national health statistics reports are the common data sources for stillbirth estimates. Countries that are signatories to global initiatives on stillbirth reduction have established national targets. Globally, nearly all countries (94.8%) have a national policy that requires every death to be registered. However, 45.5% of reviewed national policy documents made mention of registering stillbirths. Only 5 countries had national policy documents recommending training of health workers in filling out death certificates using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 for stillbirths.

Conclusion 
The current policy environment in countries is not supportive for identifying stillbirths and recording causes of death. This is likely to contribute to slow progress in stillbirth reduction. The paper proposes policy recommendations to make every baby count.

Keywords


  1. UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group, United Nations. A Neglected Tragedy: The Global Burden of Stillbirths. Report of the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group, United Nations; 2020.
  2. Kinney MV, Cocoman O, Dickson KE, et al. Implementation of the Every Newborn Action Plan: progress and lessons learned. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(5):326-337. doi:1053/j.semperi.2015.06.004
  3. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. Every Newborn: An Action Plan to End Preventable Deaths. Luxembourg: WHO, UNICEF; 2014.
  4. World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations. Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents Health 2016-2030. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Quality, Equity, Dignity: The Network to Improve Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. WHO; 2017.
  6. United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN-IGME) Summary of recommendations regarding pregnancy losses, terminations of pregnancy, stillbirths, fetal and neonatal deaths in ICD-11. [Unpublished manuscript].
  7. Dickson KE, Simen-Kapeu A, Kinney MV, et al. Every Newborn: health-systems bottlenecks and strategies to accelerate scale-up in countries. Lancet. 2014;384(9941):438-454. doi:1016/s0140-6736(14)60582-1
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO’s Framework for Action. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
  9. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98-e108. doi:1016/s2214-109x(15)00275-2
  10. Cousens S, Blencowe H, Stanton C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1319-1330. doi:1016/s0140-6736(10)62310-0
  11. Blencowe H. Counting the Smallest: Data to Estimate Global Stillbirth, Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight Rates [dissertation]. London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2020. doi:17037/pubs.04655794
  12. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587-603. doi:1016/s0140-6736(15)00837-5
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child, and Adolescent Health Policy Survey. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  14. World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing. Data Portal. https://platform.who.int/data/maternal-newborn-child-adolescent-ageing/national-policies?selectedTabName=Reports. Published 2022. Accessed April 23, 2022.
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Policy Survey, 2018-2019: Report. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  16. Katwan E, Bisoborwa G, Butron-Riveros B, et al. Creating a global legal and policy database and document repository: challenges and lessons learned from the World Health Organization sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health policy survey. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;11(11):2415-2421. doi:34172/ijhpm.2021.153
  17. Kasasa S, Natukwatsa D, Galiwango E, et al. Birth, stillbirth and death registration data completeness, quality and utility in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study. Popul Health Metr. 2021;19(Suppl 1):14. doi:1186/s12963-020-00231-2
  18. Mutale W, Bond V, Mwanamwenge MT, et al. Systems thinking in practice: the current status of the six WHO building blocks for health system strengthening in three BHOMA intervention districts of Zambia: a baseline qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:291. doi:1186/1472-6963-13-291
  19. Mounier-Jack S, Griffiths UK, Closser S, Burchett H, Marchal B. Measuring the health systems impact of disease control programmes: a critical reflection on the WHO building blocks framework. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:278. doi:1186/1471-2458-14-278
  20. Senkubuge F, Modisenyane M, Bishaw T. Strengthening health systems by health sector reforms. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23568. doi:3402/gha.v7.23568
  21. Word Bank Group. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups. Published 2021. Accessed.
  22. World Bank Group. FY22 List of Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence/brief/harmonized-list-of-fragile-situations. Published 2021. Accessed September 25, 2021.
  23. World Health Organization (WHO). ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  24. United Nations. Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, NY: United Nations; 2020.
  25. Baschieri A, Gordeev VS, Akuze J, et al. "Every Newborn-INDEPTH" (EN-INDEPTH) study protocol for a randomised comparison of household survey modules for measuring stillbirths and neonatal deaths in five Health and Demographic Surveillance sites. J Glob Health. 2019;9(1):010901. doi:7189/jogh.09.010901
  26. World Health Organization (WHO). Survive and Thrive: Transforming Care for Every Small and Sick Newborn. Geneva: WHO; 2019.
  27. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. Every Newborn Progress Report 2018. WHO, UNICEF; 2018.
  28. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. Reaching the Every Newborn National 2020 Milestones: Country Progress, Plans and Moving Forward. Geneva: WHO, UNICEF; 2017.
  29. World Health Organization (WHO). Every Newborn Action Plan. https://www.who.int/initiatives/every-newborn-action-plan. Published 2021. Accessed December 1, 2021.
  30. World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF. Ending Preventable Newborn Deaths and Stillbirths by 2030: Moving Faster Towards High Quality Universal Health Coverage in 2020-2025. Geneva: WHO, UNICEF; 2020.
  31. Under-Five Mortality. https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/under-five-mortality/. Published 2020. Updated September 2020. Accessed October 3, 2020.
  32. Grove J, Claeson M, Bryce J, et al. Maternal, newborn, and child health and the sustainable development goals--a call for sustained and improved measurement. Lancet. 2015;386(10003):1511-1514. doi:1016/s0140-6736(15)00517-6
  33. Tavares Da Silva F, Gonik B, McMillan M, et al. Stillbirth: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data. Vaccine. 2016;34(49):6057-6068. doi:1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.044
  34. Darmstadt GL, Yakoob MY, Haws RA, Menezes EV, Soomro T, Bhutta ZA. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9 Suppl 1:S6. doi:1186/1471-2393-9-s1-s6
  35. Dickson KE, Kinney MV, Moxon SG, et al. Scaling up quality care for mothers and newborns around the time of birth: an overview of methods and analyses of intervention-specific bottlenecks and solutions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15 Suppl 2:S1. doi:1186/1471-2393-15-s2-s1
  36. Lawn JE, Yakoob MY, Haws RA, Soomro T, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA. 3.2 million stillbirths: epidemiology and overview of the evidence review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9 Suppl:S2. doi:1186/1471-2393-9-s1-s2
  37. Reinebrant HE, Leisher SH, Coory M, et al. Making stillbirths visible: a systematic review of globally reported causes of stillbirth. BJOG. 2018;125(2):212-224. doi:1111/1471-0528.14971
  38. Victora CG, Rubens CE. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (4 of 7): delivery of interventions. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10 Suppl 1:S4. doi:1186/1471-2393-10-s1-s4
  39. Smith SL. The emergence, growth and decline of political priority for newborn survival in Bolivia. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(8):951-959. doi:1093/heapol/czt076
  40. Kiguli J, Munabi IG, Ssegujja E, et al. Stillbirths in sub-Saharan Africa: unspoken grief. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):e16-e18. doi:1016/s0140-6736(15)01171-x
  41. Leatherman S, Tawfik L, Jaff D, et al. Quality healthcare in extreme adversity: developing a framework for action. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020;32(2):149-155. doi:1093/intqhc/mzz131
  42. Syed SB, Leatherman S, Neilson M, et al. Improving quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings. Bull World Health Organ. 2020;98(1):2-2A. doi:2471/blt.19.246280
  43. World Health Organization (WHO). Quality of Care in Fragile, Conflict-Affected and Vulnerable Settings: Taking Action. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
  44. Oladapo OT, Adetoro OO, Ekele BA, et al. When getting there is not enough: a nationwide cross-sectional study of 998 maternal deaths and 1451 near-misses in public tertiary hospitals in a low-income country. BJOG. 2016;123(6):928-938. doi:1111/1471-0528.13450
  45. Kabongo L, Gass J, Kivondo B, Kara N, Semrau K, Hirschhorn LR. Implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist: lessons learnt on a quality improvement initiative to improve mother and newborn care at Gobabis District Hospital, Namibia. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6(2):e000145. doi:1136/bmjoq-2017-000145
  46. Brixi H, Mu Y, Targa B, Hipgrave D. Engaging sub-national governments in addressing health equities: challenges and opportunities in China's health system reform. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(8):809-824. doi:1093/heapol/czs120
  47. Schmets G, Kadandale S, Porignon D, Rajan D. Strategizing National Health in the 21st Century: A Handbook. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  48. Eboreime EA, Abimbola S, Obi FA, et al. Evaluating the sub-national fidelity of national initiatives in decentralized health systems: integrated primary health care governance in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):227. doi:1186/s12913-017-2179-2
  49. Morris ZS, Wooding S, Grant J. The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research. J R Soc Med. 2011;104(12):510-520. doi:1258/jrsm.2011.110180
  50. Bukenya B, Golooba-Mutebi F. What explains sub-national variation in maternal mortality rates within developing countries? A political economy explanation. Soc Sci Med. 2020;256:113066. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2020.113066
  51. World Health Organization (WHO). Global 100 Core Health Indicators (Plus Health-Related SDGs). Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  52. Frøen JF, Friberg IK, Lawn JE, et al. Stillbirths: progress and unfinished business. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):574-586. doi:1016/s0140-6736(15)00818-1
  53. Gurung R, Litorp H, Berkelhamer S, et al. The burden of misclassification of antepartum stillbirth in Nepal. BMJ Glob Health. 2019;4(6):e001936. doi:1136/bmjgh-2019-001936
  54. Kc A, Berkelhamer S, Gurung R, et al. The burden of and factors associated with misclassification of intrapartum stillbirth: evidence from a large scale multicentric observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(3):303-311. doi:1111/aogs.13746
  55. Qureshi ZU, Millum J, Blencowe H, et al. Stillbirth should be given greater priority on the global health agenda. BMJ. 2015;351:h4620. doi:1136/bmj.h4620
  56. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Jobe AH, Kamath-Rayne BD, Gravette MG, Rubens CE. Stillbirths and neonatal mortality as outcomes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(3):252-253. doi:1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.020
  57. Peven K, Day LT, Ruysen H, et al. Stillbirths including intrapartum timing: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(Suppl 1):226. doi:1186/s12884-020-03238-7
  58. Mony PK, Varghese B, Thomas T. Estimation of perinatal mortality rate for institutional births in Rajasthan state, India, using capture-recapture technique. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e005966. doi:1136/bmjopen-2014-005966
  59. Mikkelsen L, Phillips DE, AbouZahr C, et al. A global assessment of civil registration and vital statistics systems: monitoring data quality and progress. Lancet. 2015;386(10001):1395-1406. doi:1016/s0140-6736(15)60171-4
  60. Neogi SB, Sharma J, Negandhi P, Chauhan M, Reddy S, Sethy G. Risk factors for stillbirths: how much can a responsive health system prevent? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):33. doi:1186/s12884-018-1660-1
  61. Feresu SA, Harlow SD, Woelk GB. Risk factors for prematurity at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(6):1194-1201. doi:1093/ije/dyh120
  62. Kwesiga D, Tawiah C, Imam MA, et al. Barriers and enablers to reporting pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes in population-based surveys: EN-INDEPTH study. Popul Health Metr. 2021;19(Suppl 1):15. doi:1186/s12963-020-00228-x
  63. World Health Organization (WHO). Making Every Baby Count: Audit and Review of Stillbirths and Neonatal Deaths. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  64. Kinney MV, Walugembe DR, Wanduru P, Waiswa P, George A. Maternal and perinatal death surveillance and response in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of implementation factors. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(6):955-973. doi:1093/heapol/czab011
  65. Nkurunziza T. MPDSR Implementation in the WHO African Region. Paper presented at: Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response. WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF Joint Workshop. South Africa: WHO, AFRO; 2018.
  66. Shittu O, Kinney M. Assessment of Maternal and Perinatal Death Surveillance and Response Implementation in Nigeria. Healthy Newborn Network; 2017.
  67. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bhutta ZA, et al. Stillbirths: the vision for 2020. Lancet. 2011;377(9779):1798-1805. doi:1016/s0140-6736(10)62235-0
  68. Leisher SH, Teoh Z, Reinebrant H, et al. Classification systems for causes of stillbirth and neonatal death, 2009-2014: an assessment of alignment with characteristics for an effective global system. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:269. doi:1186/s12884-016-1040-7
  69. Ellis A, Chebsey C, Storey C, et al. Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:16. doi:1186/s12884-016-0806-2
  70. Ssegujja E, Ddumba I, Andipartin M. Prioritization of interventions in pursuit of maternal health policy objectives to mitigate stillbirth risks. An exploratory qualitative study at subnational level in Uganda. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):53. doi:1186/s12913-020-06046-z
  71. Wojcieszek AM, Boyle FM, Belizán JM, et al. Care in subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth: an international survey of parents. BJOG. 2018;125(2):193-201. doi:1111/1471-0528.14424
  72. Stillbirth Definition and Data Quality Assessment for Health Management Information Systems (HMIS). New York: UNICEF; 2022.
  • Receive Date: 15 May 2022
  • Revise Date: 21 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 31 July 2023
  • First Publish Date: 05 August 2023