The Values of the Care Economy; Comment on “Ensuring Global Health Equity in a Post-pandemic Economy”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

1 Department of Global and Intercultural Studies, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA

2 Ezintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Labonté proposes that health equity and environmental sustainability may be best obtained through a care economy. Because a care economy plays a key role in Labonté’s formulation, its position in the capitalist political economy, the work it entails, and the workers who do it all merit further reflection. I aim to complement Labonté’s editorial by elaborating on care economies and the work of social reproduction. The existing care economy is a structural part of capitalism that largely generates and sustains inequities, reinforcing Labonté’s argument that transformation is needed. Transformation could, and should, change the perceived value, status, and material rewards of work in the care economy. I then touch on the policy tools Labonté describes, highlighting how they connect to my broader point: that the care economy is currently an integral, but devalued part of capitalism. For a transformation to take place, raising perceived value, status, and material rewards of caring work and the people who do it must be an explicit policy goal. 

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Labonté R. Ensuring global health equity in a post-pandemic economy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(8):1246-1250. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.7212
  2. Cohen J. The Feminist Political Economy of Health Justice. September 29, 2021. Bill of Health. Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard Law. https://blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2021/09/29/feminist-political-economy-health-justice/. Accessed October 18, 2022.
  3. Cohen J, van der Meulen Rodgers Y. The feminist political economy of COVID-19: capitalism, women, and work. Glob Public Health. 2021;16(8-9):1381-1395. doi:1080/17441692.2021.1920044
  4. Robin C. The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
  5. Laslett B, Brenner J. Gender and social reproduction: historical perspectives. Annu Rev Sociol. 1989;15:381-404. doi:1146/annurev.so.15.080189.002121
  6. Cohen J, Venter WDF. The integration of occupational- and household-based chronic stress among South African women employed as public hospital nurses. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0231693. doi:1371/journal.pone.0231693
  7. Cohen J. Precarity of subsistence: social reproduction among South African nurses. Feminist Economics. 2023;29(1):236-265. doi:1080/13545701.2022.2123950
  8. Wu C, Qian Y. The gender peak effect: women are most vulnerable to infections during COVID-19 peaks. Front Public Health. 2022;10:937179. doi:3389/fpubh.2022.937179
  9. World Health Organization (WHO), International Labour Organization (ILO). The Gender Pay Gap in the Health and Care Sector: A Global Analysis in the Time of COVID-19. Geneva: WHO, ILO; 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240052895. Accessed July 1, 2023.
  10. Bergmann BR. Occupational segregation, wages and profits when employers discriminate by race or sex. East Econ J. 1974;1(2):103-110.
  11. Meurs M, Koutsoumpa M, Huisman V. Ensuring global health equity in a post-pandemic economy: words count! Comment on “Ensuring global health equity in a post-pandemic economy.” Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7794. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7794

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 19 October 2022
  • Revise Date: 01 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 05 August 2023
  • First Publish Date: 06 August 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics