The Pervasiveness of Power: Dilemmas for Researchers of Major System Change in Healthcare; Comment on “‘Attending to History’ in Major System Change in Healthcare in England: Specialist Cancer Surgery Service Reconfiguration”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Abstract

To study major system change (MSC) in healthcare, it is crucial to consider the influence of power. Despite this, dominant perspectives on MSC in healthcare present these as relatively neutral processes, where reconfigurations are logical solutions to clearly defined problems. Perry and colleagues’ paper adds to a growing body of research which challenges the presentation of MSC as neutral, managerial processes, instead identifying how power dynamics lie at the heart of why service change happens, how it unfolds, and its outcomes. However, the introduction of power considerations raises several overlapping methodological and ethical dilemmas for researchers, and questions regarding research design and dissemination. In this commentary, we use the insights generated by Perry et al to further explore these issues.

Keywords

References

  1. Bate A. Reconfiguration of NHS Services (England). House of Commons Library; 2017.
  2. McLellan A, Abbasi K. The NHS is not living with covid, it's dying from it. BMJ. 2022;378:o1779. doi:1136/bmj.o1779
  3. Fulop N, Walters R, Perri, Spurgeon P. Implementing changes to hospital services: factors influencing the process and ‘results’ of reconfiguration. Health Policy. 2012;104(2):128-135. doi:1016/j.healthpol.2011.05.015
  4. Fraser A, Stewart E, Jones L. Editorial: the importance of sociological approaches to the study of service change in health care. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41(7):1215-1220. doi:1111/1467-9566.12942
  5. Jones L, Fraser A, Stewart E. Exploring the neglected and hidden dimensions of large-scale healthcare change. Sociol Health Illn. 2019;41(7):1221-1235. doi:1111/1467-9566.12923
  6. Black GB, Wood VJ, Ramsay AIG, et al. Loss associated with subtractive health service change: the case of specialist cancer centralization in England. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022;27(4):301-312. doi:1177/13558196221082585
  7. Williams I, Harlock J, Robert G, Kimberly J, Mannion R. Is the end in sight? A study of how and why services are decommissioned in the English National Health Service. Sociol Health Illn. 2021;43(2):441-458. doi:1111/1467-9566.13234
  8. Harvey WS. Methodological approaches for interviewing elites. Geogr Compass. 2010;4(3):193-205. doi:1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00313.x
  9. Solarino AM, Aguinis H. Challenges and best-practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. J Manag Stud. 2021;58(3):649-672. doi:1111/joms.12620
  10. Jones L, Exworthy M. Framing in policy processes: a case study from hospital planning in the National Health Service in England. Soc Sci Med. 2015;124:196-204. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.046
  11. Bhattarai N, McMeekin P, Price C, Vale L. Economic evaluations on centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a systematic review of methods. BMJ Open. 2016;6(5):e011214. doi:1136/bmjopen-2016-011214
  12. Perry C, Boaden RJ, Black GB, et al. "Attending to history" in major system change in healthcare in England: specialist cancer surgery service reconfiguration. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(12):2829-2841. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6389
  13. Black GB, van Os S, Machen S, Fulop NJ. Ethnographic research as an evolving method for supporting healthcare improvement skills: a scoping review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):274. doi:1186/s12874-021-01466-9
  14. Carter P, Martin G. Engagement of patients and the public in NHS sustainability and transformation: an ethnographic study. Crit Soc Policy. 2018;38(4):707-727. doi:1177/0261018317749387
  15. Hammersley M. On the role of values in social research: weber vindicated? Sociol Res Online. 2017;22(1):130-141. doi:5153/sro.4197
  16. Fraser A, Baeza J, Boaz A, Ferlie E. Biopolitics, space and hospital reconfiguration. Soc Sci Med. 2019;230:111-121. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.011
  17. Steward E. Publics and Their Health Systems: Rethinking Participation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016.
  18. Lavis J, Ross S, McLeod C, Gildiner A. Measuring the impact of health research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8(3):165-170. doi:1258/135581903322029520

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 22 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 02 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 05 August 2023
  • First Publish Date: 06 August 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics