Health in All Policies at the Local Level: What Facilitates Success?; Comment on “A Realist Explanatory Case Study Investigating How Common Goals, Leadership, and Committed Staff Facilitate Health in All Policies Implementation in the Municipality of Kuopio, Finland”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 Centre of the Health in All Policies Research Translation, School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

2 Health Translation SA, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia

3 WHO Collaborating Centre on Advancing Health in All Policies Implementation, Adelaide, SA, Australia

4 Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland

Abstract

The paper by Guglielmin and colleagues1 examines the implementation of Health in All Policies (HiAP) in a local government context in Kuopio Finland. The authors use a realist explanatory case study design to explore what has supported HiAP implementation with a focus on two specific hypotheses on what leads to success: common goals and committed leadership and staff. The paper is well argued using appropriate methodology and their findings support the importance of the success factors tested by their two hypotheses. However, the narrowed focus on just two hypotheses underrepresents the complexity of implementing HiAP at any level of government, including local government. Given its local government focus, the paper would have been strengthened by referencing the lessons gained from the Healthy Cities movement. Local government is a critical setting for action to address health and health equity and there is great potential to continue research that adds to the knowledge base on how to successful implement HiAP. Finally, it is important to acknowledge that Finland has a unique HiAP history. It is recognised as a global leader in the field, and the role of local government in Finland differs from many other countries. These factors may impact on the transferability of the case study findings. 

Keywords

References

  1. Guglielmin M, Shankardass K, Bayoumi A, O’Campo P, Kokkinen L, Muntaner C. A realist explanatory case study investigating how common goals, leadership, and committed staff facilitate Health in All Policies implementation in the municipality of Kuopio, Finland. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(11):2651–2659. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.6355
  2. Wilkinson RG, Marmot M. Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts. 2nd ed. Geneva: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003.
  3. World Health Organization, Government of South Australia. Adelaide Statement II (2017) on Health in All Policies. Adelaide: World Health Organization, Government of South Australia; 2019.
  4. McGregor JA, Pouw N. Towards an economics of well-being. Cambridge J Econ. 2017;41(4):1123-1142. doi:1093/cje/bew044
  5. Van Vliet-Brown CE, Shahram S, Oelke ND. Health in all policies utilization by municipal governments: scoping review. Health Promot Int. 2018;33(4):713-722. doi:10.1093/heapro/dax008
  6. Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, MacDougall C, et al. To what extent can the activities of the South Australian health in all policies initiative be linked to population health outcomes using a program theory-based evaluation? BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):88. doi:1186/s12889-019-6408-y
  7. Shankardass K, Muntaner C, Kokkinen L, et al. The implementation of health in all policies initiatives: a systems framework for government action. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):26. doi:1186/s12961-018-0295-z
  8. Global Network for Health in All Policies, Government of South Australia. Global Status Report on Health in All Policies. Adelaide: Global Network for Health in All Policies, Government of South Australia; 2019. https://actionsdg.ctb.ku.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/HiAP-summary-v5-final-SPREADS.pdf.
  9. National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). Health in All Policies- Experiences from Local Health Departments. Washington, DC: NACCHO; 2017. https://www.naccho.org/uploads/downloadable-resources/NACCHO-HiAP-Report_Experiences-from-Local-Health-Departments-Feb-2017.pdf.
  10. Baum F, Delany-Crowe T, MacDougall C, Lawless A, van Eyk H, Williams C. Ideas, actors and institutions: lessons from South Australian health in all policies on what encourages other sectors' involvement. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):811. doi:1186/s12889-017-4821-7
  11. Such E, Smith K, Woods HB, Meier P. Governance of intersectoral collaborations for population health and to reduce health inequalities in high-income countries: a complexity-informed systematic review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(12):2780-2792. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.6550
  12. Ståhl T, Koivusalo M. Health in all policies: concept, purpose, and implementation. In: Haring R, Kickbusch I, Ganten D, Moeti M, eds. Handbook of Global Health. Cham: Springer; 2022. doi:1007/978-3-030-05325-3_80-1
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Working Together for Equity and Healthier Populations: Sustainable Multisectoral Collaboration Based on Health in All Policies Approaches. Geneva: WHO; 2023.
  14. Scheele CE, Little I, Diderichsen F. Governing health equity in Scandinavian municipalities: the inter-sectorial challenge. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(1):57-67. doi:1177/1403494816685538

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 15 February 2023
  • Revise Date: 07 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 07 August 2023
  • First Publish Date: 08 August 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics