Widening the Lens: Reflecting on the Mixing of System Dynamics With Action Research Alongside Work Within the Problem Structuring Methods Field; Comment on “Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia

Abstract

This commentary reflects upon the insights for improvement cases reported by Holmström et al where they consider the integration of action research (AR) — a research methodology — and system dynamics (SD) — a modelling technique — to manage the complexity of patient care pathways. Whilst this combination can be effective, recognising that SD is a simulation model whereas AR is a research approach is important for both practical and conceptual reasons. In addition, some of the benefits noted can also be achieved through taking a wider examination of modelling techniques, particularly problem structuring methods (PSMs) as SD has been considered a PSM and PSMs are designed to effectively engage multi-disciplinary group members in the search for solutions as this will provide further avenues for both engagement and learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Holmström P, Björk-Eriksson T, Davidsen P, Bååthe F, Olsson C. Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(11):2707-2718. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.5693
  2. Eden C. A framework for thinking about group decision support systems (GDSS). Group Decis Negot. 1992;1(3):199-218. doi:1007/bf00126263
  3. Eden C, Ackermann F. Use of ‘soft-OR’ models by clients: what do they want from them? In: Pidd M, ed. Systems Modelling: Theory & Practice. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.
  4. Franco LA, Hämäläinen RP, Rouwette EAJA, Leppänen I. Taking stock of behavioural OR: a review of behavioural studies with an intervention focus. Eur J Ope Res. 2021;293(2):401-418. doi:1016/j.ejor.2020.11.031
  5. Winnicott DW. Transitional objects and transitional phenomena; a study of the first not-me possession. Int J Psychoanal. 1953;34(2):89-97.
  6. Zagonel AA. Model conceptualization in group model building: a review of the literature exploring the tension between representing reality and negotiating a social order. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Palermo, Italy: System Dynamics Society; 2002.
  7. Eden C. The unfolding nature of group decision support. In: Eden C, Radford J, eds. Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. London: SAGE Publications; 1990.
  8. Thompson JP, Howick S, Belton V. Critical Learning Incidents in system dynamics modelling engagements. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;249(3):945-958. doi:1016/j.ejor.2015.09.048
  9. Peck S. Group model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. J Oper Res Soc. 1998;49(7):766-767. doi:1057/palgrave.jors.2600567
  10. Ackermann F, Franco LA, Gallupe B, Parent M. GSS for multi-organizational collaboration: reflections on process and content. Group Decis Negot. 2005;14(4):307-331. doi:1007/s10726-005-0317-4
  11. Ackermann F, Eden C. Mapping out Strategic Success. London: SAGE Publications; 2008.
  12. Kim WC, Mauborgne RA. A procedural justice model of strategic decision making: strategy content implications in the multinational. Organ Sci. 1995;6(1):44-61. doi:1287/orsc.6.1.44
  13. Mingers J, Rosenhead J. Problem structuring methods in action. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;152(3):530-554. doi:1016/s0377-2217(03)00056-0
  14. Mingers J, Gill A. Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies. Chichester: John Wiley& Sons; 1997.
  15. Rose J. Soft systems methodology as a social science research tool. Syst Res Behav Sci. 1997;14(4):249-258. doi:1002/(sici)1099-1743(199707/08)14:4<249::aid-sres119>3.0.co;2-s
  16. Eden C, Ackermann F. Theory into practice, practice to theory: action research in method development. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;271(3):1145-1155. doi:1016/j.ejor.2018.05.061
  17. James M, Cotter S, Fairley A, Payne A. How to Use and Choose a Management Consultant. London: The Economist; 1989.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 16 August 2022
  • Revise Date: 19 September 2023
  • Accept Date: 20 September 2023
  • First Publish Date: 23 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics