Factors Associated With Emergency Department Visits Among Patients Receiving Publicly-Funded Homecare Services: A Retrospective Chart Review From Southern Taiwan Regional Hospital

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Family Medicine, Kaohsiung Armed Forces General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

2 The Master Program of Long-Term Care in Aging, College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

3 Department of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

4 Center for Long-Term Care Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

5 Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Abstract

Background 
The public health strategy of increasing access to comprehensive home or community-based healthcare services and emergency home visits is intent on reducing the overcrowding of emergency departments (EDs). However, scientific evidence regarding the association between home-based healthcare services and ED uses is surprisingly insufficient and controversial so far. The present retrospective study identified the risk factors for ED visits among patients receiving publicly-funded homecare services.

Methods 
The personal demographic and medical information, caregiver characteristics, and behaviours related to homecare services and ED visits from the medical records and structured questionnaires of 108 patients who were recipients of integrated homecare services in a regional hospital in southern Taiwan between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were collected. After screening the potential predictor variables using the preliminary univariate analyses, the multivariate logistic regression with best subset selection approach was conducted to identify best combination of determinants to predict unplanned ED utilizations.

Results 
Best subset selection regression analysis showed Charlson Comorbidity Index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.70), male caregiver (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.66), duration of introducing homecare services (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.95 to 1.00), working experience of dedicated nurses (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.99) and number of ED utilizations within previous past year before enrollment (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.10) as significant determinants for unplanned ED visits.

Conclusion 
The present evidence may help government agencies propose supportive policies to improve access to integrated homecare resources and promote appropriate care recommendations to reduce unplanned or nonurgent ED visits among patients receiving homecare services.

Keywords

References

  1. National Development Council (R.O.C.) Taiwan. Trend in the Percentage of Elderly Population. National Development Council; 2020. [Chinese].
  2. National Development Council (R.O.C.) Taiwan. Population Projections for Republic of China (Taiwan): 2014-2061. National Development Council; 2013. [Chinese].
  3. National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, (R.O.C.) Taiwan. 2020-2021 Handbook of Taiwan's National Health Insurance. 2019.
  4. National Health Insurance Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, (R.O.C.) Taiwan. Taiwan Health and Welfare Report. 2019. [Chinese].
  5. College of Family Physicians of Canada. A Vision for Canada: Family Practice – the Patient’s Medical Home. Mississauga, ON: College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2011.
  6. Latham LP, Ackroyd-Stolarz S. Emergency department utilization by older adults: a descriptive study. Can Geriatr J. 2014;17(4):118-125. doi:5770/cgj.17.108
  7. Vaartio-Rajalin H, Fagerström L. Professional care at home: patient-centredness, interprofessionality and effectivity? A scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2019;27(4):e270-e288. doi:1111/hsc.12731
  8. Wilson D, Truman C. Comparing the health services utilization of long-term-care residents, home-care recipients, and the well elderly. Can J Nurs Res. 2005;37(4):138-154.
  9. Campagna S, Borraccino A, Politano G, et al. Determinants associated with the risk of emergency department visits among patients receiving integrated home care services: a 6-year retrospective observational study in a large Italian region. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021;10(10):605-612. doi:34172/ijhpm.2020.79
  10. Campagna S, Conti A, Dimonte V, Berchialla P, Borraccino A, Gianino MM. Emergency department visits before, after and during integrated home care: a time series analyses in Italy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(12):3012-3018. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.6662
  11. Ruiz S, Snyder LP, Rotondo C, Cross-Barnet C, Colligan EM, Giuriceo K. Innovative home visit models associated with reductions in costs, hospitalizations, and emergency department use. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(3):425-432. doi:1377/hlthaff.2016.1305
  12. Seow H, Barbera L, Pataky R, et al. Does increasing home care nursing reduce emergency department visits at the end of life? A population-based cohort study of cancer decedents. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(2):204-212. doi:1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.008
  13. Godwin M, Gadag V, Pike A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the effect of an intensive 1-year care management program on measures of health status in independent, community-living old elderly: the Eldercare project. Fam Pract. 2016;33(1):37-41. doi:1093/fampra/cmv089
  14. Schumacher C, Jones A, Costa AP. Home care nursing visits and same-day emergency department use: which patients are most at risk? Can J Nurs Res. 2021;53(4):376-383. doi:1177/0844562120949426
  15. Jones A, Schumacher C, Bronskill SE, et al. The association between home care visits and same-day emergency department use: a case-crossover study. CMAJ. 2018;190(17):E525-E531. doi:1503/cmaj.170892
  16. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Tibshirani R. Best subset, forward stepwise or lasso? Analysis and recommendations based on extensive comparisons. Stat Sci. 2020;35(4):579-592. doi:1214/19-STS733
  17. Liao JG, Cavanaugh JE, McMurry TL. Extending AIC to best subset regression. Comput Stat. 2018;33(2):787-806. doi:1007/s00180-018-0797-8
  18. Stall N, Nowaczynski M, Sinha SK. Systematic review of outcomes from home-based primary care programs for homebound older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2243-2251. doi:1111/jgs.13088
  19. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383. doi:1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
  20. Huntley AL, Johnson R, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Salisbury C. Measures of multimorbidity and morbidity burden for use in primary care and community settings: a systematic review and guide. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(2):134-141. doi:1370/afm.1363
  21. Dong HJ, Wressle E, Marcusson J. Multimorbidity patterns of and use of health services by Swedish 85-year-olds: an exploratory study. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:120. doi:1186/1471-2318-13-120
  22. Biese K, Massing M, Platts-Mills TF, et al. Predictors of 30-day return following an emergency department visit for older adults. N C Med J. 2019;80(1):12-18. doi:18043/ncm.80.1.12
  23. Chou HC, Huang CT, Sheng WH. Differential roles of comorbidity burden and functional status in elderly and non-elderly patients with infections in general wards. J Formos Med Assoc. 2020;119(4):821-828. doi:1016/j.jfma.2019.08.032
  24. McGregor MJ, Cox MB, Slater JM, et al. A before-after study of hospital use in two frail populations receiving different home-based services over the same time in Vancouver, Canada. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):248. doi:1186/s12913-018-3040-y
  25. Miller B, Montgomery A. Family caregivers and limitations in social activities. Res Aging. 1990;12(1):72-93. doi:1177/0164027590121004
  26. Chappell NL, Dujela C, Smith A. Caregiver well-being: intersections of relationship and gender. Res Aging. 2015;37(6):623-645. doi:1177/0164027514549258
  27. Calasanti T, Bowen ME. Spousal caregiving and crossing gender boundaries: maintaining gendered identities. J Aging Stud. 2006;20(3):253-263. doi:1016/j.jaging.2005.08.001
  28. Dunton N, Gajewski B, Klaus S, Pierson B. The relationship of nursing workforce characteristics to patient outcomes. Online J Issues Nurs. 2007;12(3):1-11. doi:3912/OJIN.Vol12No03Man03
  29. Dufour I, Chouinard MC, Dubuc N, Beaudin J, Lafontaine S, Hudon C. Factors associated with frequent use of emergency-department services in a geriatric population: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):185. doi:1186/s12877-019-1197-9
  30. Franchi C, Cartabia M, Santalucia P, et al. Emergency department visits in older people: pattern of use, contributing factors, geographical differences and outcomes. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29(2):319-326. doi:1007/s40520-016-0550-5
  31. McCusker J, Cardin S, Bellavance F, Belzile E. Return to the emergency department among elders: patterns and predictors. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7(3):249-259. doi:1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb01070.x
  32. Lee HC, Lee TY, Yang YC, Lee YS. Risk factors of one-year readmission or emergency room revisit in patients receiving home health care. Taiwan J Fam Med. 2018;28(4):208-218. doi:3966/168232812018122804003
  33. Alessi DM, Berci G. Aspiration and nasogastric intubation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;94(4):486-489. doi:1177/019459988609400414
  34. Chu LW, Pei CK. Risk factors for early emergency hospital readmission in elderly medical patients. Gerontology. 1999;45(4):220-226. doi:1159/000022091
  35. Lin LC, Wu SC, Chen HS, Wang TG, Chen MY. Prevalence of impaired swallowing in institutionalized older people in Taiwan. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(6):1118-1123. doi:1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50270.x
  36. Ministry of Health and Welfare, (R.O.C.) Taiwan. The nasogastric tube feeding rate in Taiwan. 2021. [Chinese].
  37. Barbiellini Amidei C, Macciò S, Cantarutti A, et al. Hospitalizations and emergency department visits trends among elderly individuals in proximity to death: a retrospective population-based study. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):21472. doi:1038/s41598-021-00648-1
  38. Rosenwax LK, McNamara BA, Murray K, McCabe RJ, Aoun SM, Currow DC. Hospital and emergency department use in the last year of life: a baseline for future modifications to end-of-life care. Med J Aust. 2011;194(11):570-573. doi:5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03106.x

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 June 2022
  • Revise Date: 31 August 2023
  • Accept Date: 25 September 2023
  • First Publish Date: 26 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics