Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research: Drivers and Challenges in a Synergetic Complementarity; Comment on “Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research”

Document Type : Commentary

Author

Decision Sciences and Complex Systems Group, Faculty of Islamic Studies and Management, Imam Sadiq University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

This commentary discusses the paper by Holmström et al that explored how system dynamics (SD) may contribute effectively to an action research (AR) process to improve five health case studies. Accordingly, we reviewed some of the methodological aspects of the proposed integration of SD into AR using ongoing debates on multi-methodology and mixed methods research. In a systemic evaluation of the proposed design, we concentrated on some of the common distinct features of SD and AR, and the challenges as well as the expected outcomes of this integration. Finally, we tried to position the suggested framework within the multi-methodology efforts and to pave the way for developing it in future research and practice.

Keywords


  1. Holmström P, Björk-Eriksson T, Davidsen P, Bååthe F, Olsson C. Insights gained from a re-analysis of five improvement cases in healthcare integrating system dynamics into action research. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(11):2707-2718. doi:34172/ijhpm.2022.5693
  2. Mingers J, Brocklesby J. Multimethodology: towards a framework for mixing methodologies. Omega. 1997;25(5):489-509. doi:1016/s0305-0483(97)00018-2
  3. Page SE. The Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You. London, UK: Hachette; 2018.
  4. Nastasi BK, Hitchcock JH, Gutierrez R, Oshrin S. Promoting quality of mixed methods consultation research: a synergistic participatory framework. J Educ Psychol Consult. 2022;32(1):22-45. doi:1080/10474412.2021.1887743
  5. Franco LA, Lord E. Understanding multi-methodology: Evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions. Omega. 2011;39(3):362-372. doi:1016/j.omega.2010.06.008
  6. Nastasi BK, Hitchcock JH, Brown LM. An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010:305-338.
  7. Flood RL. The relationship of ‘systems thinking’ to action research. Syst Pract Action Res. 2010;23(4):269-284. doi:1007/s11213-010-9169-1
  8. Bradbury-Huang H. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2015.
  9. Zolfagharian M, Romme AGL, Walrave B. Why, when, and how to combine system dynamics with other methods: towards an evidence-based framework. J Simul. 2018;12(2):98-114. doi:1080/17477778.2017.1418639
  10. Zolfagharian M, Akbari R, Fartookzadeh H. Theory of knowledge in system dynamics models. Found Sci. 2014;19(2):189-207. doi:1007/s10699-013-9328-9
  11. Morecroft JD. Strategic Modelling and Business Dynamics: A Feedback Systems Approach. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
  12. Christ TW. Teaching mixed methods and action research: pedagogical, practical, and evaluative considerations. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, eds. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010:643-676.
  13. Eden C, Ackermann F. Theory into practice, practice to theory: action research in method development. Eur J Oper Res. 2018;271(3):1145-1155. doi:1016/j.ejor.2018.05.061
  14. Jackson MC. Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of Complexity. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
  15. Zolfagharian M. How To Study Transition Problems? Theories, Methods and Models. Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology; 2019.
  • Receive Date: 31 July 2022
  • Revise Date: 15 October 2023
  • Accept Date: 16 October 2023
  • First Publish Date: 17 October 2023