Identifying Positive Practices to Institutionalize Social Innovation in the Malawian Health System

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

2 Chembe Collaborative, Los Angeles, CA, USA

3 School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

4 School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

5 The Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi

6 VillageReach, Lilongwe, Malawi

7 Malaria Alert Centre, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi

Abstract

Background 
Governments worldwide are increasingly interested in scaling up effective public health innovations, but it is not always easy to institutionalize innovations, arising outside the public health system, as a part of national delivery. Evidence on how country governments can practically achieve this is limited. This article describes the institutionalization of the Chipatala Cha Pa Foni (CCPF, Health Center by Phone) social innovation into the Malawian public health, and identifies positive institutional practices that local actors drew on to achieve this.
 
Methods 
A positive-oriented interdisciplinary multi-method qualitative case study design was adopted. Data were collected from key informant interviews, observations, and documents over 18 months. A composite social innovation framework, informed by institutional theory and positive organizational scholarship, guided the thematic content analysis.
 
Results 
Four clusters of positive institutional practices aided the institutionalization of the innovation: building highquality relationships; creating opportunities for experiential interaction; cultivating hope; and logic attunement and awareness. We describe how these four practices operated together as a process of “everyday creativity” to achieve institutionalization. We illustrate the importance of high-quality relationships, marked by respect, mutuality, and appreciation, as the foundation upon which hope can be built and the creativity needed for institutionalization to flourish. National ownership and sustainability of innovations are enhanced when implementation and institutionalization approaches are attuned to the logics inherent in national identity.
 
Conclusion 
In this article, we highlight the importance of institutional and interpersonal dynamics in the institutionalization of social innovation in health systems. 

Keywords


  1. Spicer N, Hamza YA, Berhanu D, et al. 'The development sector is a graveyard of pilot projects!' Six critical actions for externally funded implementers to foster scale-up of maternal and newborn health innovations in low and middle-income countries. Global Health. 2018;14(1):74. doi:1186/s12992-018-0389-y
  2. Yamey G. What are the barriers to scaling up health interventions in low- and middle-income countries? A qualitative study of academic leaders in implementation science. Global Health. 2012;8:11. doi:1186/1744-8603-8-11
  3. Results for Development. Enhancing Public Sector Demand for, and Scaling of, Health Innovations: A New Approach to Integrating Innovation to Strengthen Public Health Systems. New York: International Development Innovation Alliance; 2021.
  4. Results for Development. Center for Health Market Innovations. 2022. https://healthmarketinnovations.org. Accessed July 5, 2022.
  5. Spring Impact, VillageReach. The Journey to Scale with Government. 2020.
  6. Social Innovation in Health Initiative. 2021. https://socialinnovationinhealth.org. Accessed January 20, 2023.
  7. Moulaert F. Social innovation: institutionally embedded, territorially (re) produced. In: MacCullum D, Moulaert J, Hiller J, Vicari Haddock S, eds. Social Innovation and Territorial Development. Farnham, UK: Ashgate Publishing; 2009:11-24.
  8. Billings DL, Crane BB, Benson J, Solo J, Fetters T. Scaling-up a public health innovation: a comparative study of post-abortion care in Bolivia and Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64(11):2210-2222. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.026
  9. Ben Charif A, Zomahoun HTV, Gogovor A, et al. Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2022;20(1):34. doi:1186/s12961-022-00830-5
  10. Spicer N, Bhattacharya D, Dimka R, et al. 'Scaling-up is a craft not a science': catalysing scale-up of health innovations in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria. Soc Sci Med. 2014;121:30-38. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.046
  11. Petersen I, van Rensburg A, Kigozi F, et al. Scaling up integrated primary mental health in six low- and middle-income countries: obstacles, synergies and implications for systems reform. BJPsych Open. 2019;5(5):e69. doi:1192/bjo.2019.7
  12. Sgaier SK, Ramakrishnan A, Dhingra N, et al. How the Avahan HIV prevention program transitioned from the Gates Foundation to the government of India. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(7):1265-1273. doi:1377/hlthaff.2012.0646
  13. Paina L, Peters DH. Understanding pathways for scaling up health services through the lens of complex adaptive systems. Health Policy Plan. 2012;27(5):365-373. doi:1093/heapol/czr054
  14. World Health Organization (WHO), ExpandNet. Practical Guidance for Scaling up Health Service Innovations. WHO; 2009.
  15. van Niekerk L, Manderson L, Balabanova D. The application of social innovation in healthcare: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty. 2021;10(1):26. doi:1186/s40249-021-00794-8
  16. Bautista-Gómez MM, van Niekerk L. Correction to: A social innovation model for equitable access to quality health services for rural populations: a case from Sumapaz, a rural district of Bogota, Colombia. Int J Equity Health. 2022;21(1):53. doi:1186/s12939-022-01649-w
  17. Halpaap BM, Tucker JD, Mathanga D, et al. Social innovation in global health: sparking location action. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(5):e633-e634. doi:1016/s2214-109x(20)30070-x
  18. van Wijk J, Zietsma C, Dorado S, de Bakker FGA, Martí I. Social innovation: integrating micro, meso, and macro level insights from institutional theory. Bus Soc. 2019;58(5):887-918. doi:1177/0007650318789104
  19. Westley F, Antadze N. Making a difference: strategies for scaling social innovation for greater impact. Innov J. 2010;15(2):1-19.
  20. Montgomery T. Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable? Voluntas. 2016;27(4):1979-2000. doi:1007/s11266-016-9688-1
  21. Mgunda T. Revolutionising Rural Healthcare Through Chipatala Cha Pa Foni. Malawi: The Times; 2023.
  22. Impact Evaluation of Chipatala cha pa Foni (CCPF), Malawi’s Health and Nutrition Hotline. VillageReach; 2019.
  23. Blauvelt C, West M, Maxim L, et al. Scaling up a health and nutrition hotline in Malawi: the benefits of multisectoral collaboration. BMJ. 2018;363:k4590. doi:1136/bmj.k4590
  24. van Niekerk L, Fosiko N, Likaka A, Blauvelt CP, Msiska B, Manderson L. From idea to systems solution: enhancing access to primary care in Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):547. doi:1186/s12913-023-09349-z
  25. Sheikh K, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, Hanson K, Ssengooba F, Bennett S. Building the field of health policy and systems research: framing the questions. PLoS Med. 2011;8(8):e1001073. doi:1371/journal.pmed.1001073
  26. Moulaert F, Van Dyck B. Framing social innovation research: a sociology of knowledge (SoK) perspective. In: Moulaert F, MacCallum D, Mehmood A, Hamdouch A, eds. The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Cheltenham, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar; 2013:466-479.
  27. Yin RK. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed: Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.
  28. Gilson L. Health Policy and Systems Research: A Methodology Reader. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  29. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ. 1982;30(4):233-252. doi:1007/bf02765185
  30. Lawrence TB, Suddaby R. Institutions and institutional work. In: Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence TB, Nord WR, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE Publications; 2006:215-254.
  31. Nilsson W. Positive institutional work: exploring institutional work through the lens of positive organizational scholarship. Acad Manage Rev. 2015;40(3):370-398. doi:5465/amr.2013.0188
  32. Cameron K, Dutton JE, Quinn RE. Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler; 2003.
  33. Fredrickson BL. Positive emotions broaden and build. In: Devine P, Plant A, eds. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 47. Burlington: Academic Press; 2013:1-53. doi:1016/b978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2
  34. Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, Von Savigny E. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge; 2001.
  35. Dutton JE, Sonenshein S. Positive organizational scholarship. In: Lopez S, ed. Encyclopedia of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:737-742.
  36. Cameron K. Addressing Criticisms of Positive Psychology and Positive Organizational Scholarship. Paper presented at: Canadian Positive Psychology Association Conference; 2016.
  37. Caza BB, Caza A. Positive organizational scholarship: a critical theory perspective. J Manag Inq. 2008;17(1):21-33. doi:1177/1056492607305907
  38. Stephens JP, Heaphy E, Dutton JE. High-quality connections. In: Spreitzer GM, Cameron K, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:385-399.
  39. Ramarajan L, Barsade SG, Burack OR. The influence of organizational respect on emotional exhaustion in the human services. J Posit Psychol. 2008;3(1):4-18. doi:1080/17439760701750980
  40. Carmeli A, Dutton JE, Hardin AE. Respect as an engine for new ideas: linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Hum Relat. 2015;68(6):1021-1047. doi:1177/0018726714550256
  41. Brown BJ. Mutuality in health care: review, concept analysis and ways forward. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(9-10):1464-1475. doi:1111/jocn.13180
  42. Buber M. I and Thou. New York, NY: Kauffman W; 1970.
  43. Briant S, Freshwater D. Exploring mutuality within the nurse–patient relationship. Br J Nurs. 1998;7(4):204-211. doi:12968/bjon.1998.7.4.204
  44. Pearce CL. The future of leadership: combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Acad Manag Perspect. 2004;18(1):47-57. doi:5465/ame.2004.12690298
  45. Cooperrider DL, Srivastva S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In: Research in Organizational Change and Development. JAI Press Inc; 1987. p. 129-169.
  46. Cooperrider DL, Whitney D. A positive revolution in change: appreciative inquiry. In: Cooperrider DL, Sorensen PF, Whitney D, Yaeger TF, eds. Appreciative Inquiry: Rethinking Human Organization Toward a Positive Theory of Change. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing; 2000.
  47. Nilsson WO. Sustaining Engagement in Social Purpose Organizations: An Institutional Perspective on Positive Organizational Practices. Montreal: Faculty of Management, McGill University; 2009.
  48. Furnari S. Interstitial spaces: microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad Manage Rev. 2014;39(4):439-462. doi:5465/amr.2012.0045
  49. Ludema JD, Wilmot TB, Srivastva S. Organizational hope: reaffirming the constructive task of social and organizational inquiry. Hum Relat. 1997;50(8):1015-1052. doi:1023/A:1016985129104
  50. Friedland R, Alford R. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ, eds. A New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1991.
  51. Thornton PH, Ocasio W. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. Am J Sociol. 1999;105(3):801-843. doi:1086/210361
  52. Malawi Ministry of Health. Malawi National Health Accounts Report for Fiscal Years 2015/16, 2016/17, and 2017/18. Lilongwe, Malawi: Ministry of Health, Department of Planning and Policy Development; 2020.
  53. Sindima H. Bondedness, Moyo and Umunthu as the elements of aChewa spirituality: organizing logic and principle of life. Ultimate Reality and Meaning. 1991;14(1):5-20.
  54. Lindland EH. Crossroads of Culture: Religion, Therapy, and Personhood in Northern Malawi [dissertation]. Emory University; 2005.
  55. Englund H. Witchcraft, modernity and the person: the morality of accumulation in central Malawi. Crit Anthropol. 1996;16(3):257-279. doi:1177/0308275x9601600303
  56. Karp I. Concept of personhood. In: Middleton J, ed. Encyclopedia of Africa. London, New York: McMillan; 1997.
  57. Cameron K, Mora C, Leutscher T, Calarco M. Effects of positive practices on organizational effectiveness. J Appl Behav Sci. 2011;47(3):266-308. doi:1177/0021886310395514
  58. Gilson L, Barasa E, Nxumalo N, et al. Everyday resilience in district health systems: emerging insights from the front lines in Kenya and South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000224. doi:1136/bmjgh-2016-000224
  59. Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS, Stephens JP, Heaphy E, Dutton JE. High-quality connections. In: Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011:385-399.
  60. Carlsen A, Hagen A, Mortensen TF. Imagining hope in organizations: from individual goal-attainment to horizons of relational possibility. In: Spreitzer GM, Cameron KS, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2011:288-303.

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 18 November 2024
  • Receive Date: 31 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 08 May 2024
  • Accept Date: 17 November 2024
  • First Publish Date: 18 November 2024