Impact of China’s National Volume-Based Drug Procurement: A Multilevel Interrupted Time Series Analysis on Medical Expenditures in Hypertensive Patients

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, and Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

2 NMPA Key Laboratory for Real World Data Research and Evaluation in Hainan, Chengdu, China

3 Sichuan Center of Technology Innovation for Real World Data, Chengdu, China

4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

5 Tianjin Healthcare and Medical Big Data Co., Ltd, Tianjin, China

6 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Abstract

Background 
The National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP), implemented in China in 2019, aims to reduce patients’ economic burden by lowering drug prices and promoting the use of NVBP drugs in public hospitals. We evaluated the impact of NVBP on medical expenditures among hypertensive patients, analyzing both the overall impact and variations in policy effects across individual hospitals.
 
Methods 
Using medical records from 1.17 million hypertensive patients across 82 hospitals in Tianjin (2017-2021), we conducted an interrupted time series analysis to assess expenditure changes among hypertensive patients for the treatment of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, type 2 diabetes, and chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD). Multilevel model was employed to estimate the overall impact and hospital-specific variations in policy effects.
 
Results 
NVBP implementation significantly reduced per-visit outpatient expenditures among hypertensive patients for the treatment of hypertension (-15.61%), dyslipidaemia (-25.77%), and diabetes (-17.59%) by lowering drug expenditures. Although drug expenditures for chronic IHD decreased, non-drug expenditures increased, leading to no significant change in total expenditures for chronic IHD (-8.97%). For inpatient expenditures, no significant changes in total per-admission expenditures were observed for chronic IHD or diabetes hospitalizations. Drug expenditures for diabetes decreased significantly, but diagnostic expenditures increased, while no significant change was found in chronic IHD drug expenditures. At the individual hospital level, significant variations in policy effects were observed. Despite the overall decrease in outpatient expenditures for the treatment of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes, only 45.6%, 67.2%, and 46.3% of hospitals, respectively, showed significant decreases, while the remainder exhibited either non-significant changes or increases.
 
Conclusion 
NVBP effectively reduced outpatient expenditures among hypertensive patients for the treatment of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes, suggesting its potential to alleviate patients’ economic burdens. However, the increases in non-drug expenditures and substantial variations in policy effects across hospitals highlight a room for further improvement in policy implementation and overall effectiveness. 

Keywords


  1. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guideline on Country Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies. Geneva: WHO; 2020.
  2. van Valen M, Jamieson D, Parvin L, Ramirez CL. Dispelling myths about drug procurement policy. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(6):e609-e610. doi:1016/s2214-109x(18)30190-6
  3. Vogler S, Bauer E, Habimana K. Centralised pharmaceutical procurement: learnings from six European countries. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022;20(5):637-650. doi:1007/s40258-022-00729-w
  4. Baldi S, Vannoni D. The impact of centralization on pharmaceutical procurement prices: the role of institutional quality and corruption. Reg Stud. 2017;51(3):426-438. doi:1080/00343404.2015.1101517
  5. Pramesh CS, Sengar M, Patankar S, et al. A National Cancer Grid pooled procurement initiative, India. Bull World Health Organ. 2023;101(9):587-594. doi:2471/blt.23.289714
  6. Zhu Z, Wang Q, Sun Q, Lexchin J, Yang L. Improving access to medicines and beyond: the national volume-based procurement policy in China. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8(7):e011535. doi:1136/bmjgh-2022-011535
  7. China Daily. Bulk Drug Procurement Nets Savings for Patients. 2022. http://english.www.gov.cn/statecouncil/ministries/202207/14/content_WS62cf5c8fc6d02e533532db74.html. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  8. Long H, Yang Y, Geng X, Mao Z, Mao Z. Changing characteristics of pharmaceutical prices in China under centralized procurement policy: a multi-intervention interrupted time series. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:944540. doi:3389/fphar.2022.944540
  9. Chen Y, Ji X, Xiao H, et al. Impact of the pilot volume-based drug purchasing policy in China: interrupted time-series analysis with controls. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:804237. doi:3389/fphar.2021.804237
  10. McGuire TG, Pauly MV. Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers. J Health Econ. 1991;10(4):385-410. doi:1016/0167-6296(91)90022-f
  11. Chen L, Yang Y, Luo M, Hu B, Yin S, Mao Z. The impacts of national centralized drug procurement policy on drug utilization and drug expenditures: the case of Shenzhen, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9415. doi:3390/ijerph17249415
  12. Ferraresi M, Gucciardi G, Rizzo L. Savings from public procurement centralization in the healthcare system. Eur J Polit Econ. 2021;66:101963. doi:1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101963
  13. Lan T, Guan L, Pang X, Li X, Yu Q. Impact of the national centralized drug procurement policy (4 + 7 policy) on the drug expenditures of patients treated in outpatient and emergency departments in a large tertiary level-A hospital in China: a single centre, interrupted time series. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47(1):104-111. doi:1111/jcpt.13551
  14. Zhang YJ, Ren Y, Zheng Q, et al. The impact of national centralized drug procurement on health expenditures for lung cancer inpatients: a difference-in-differences analysis in a large tertiary hospital in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:956823. doi:3389/fpubh.2022.956823
  15. Shang L, Cheng Y, Zhou J, et al. Impacts of national volume-based drug procurement policy on the utilization and costs of antihypertensive drugs in a Chinese medicine hospital: an interrupted time series analysis of 5138 patients. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1302154. doi:3389/fphar.2024.1302154
  16. Li X, Tao R, Jin Y, Li N. National centralized drug procurement and health care expenditure of households-micro-evidence from CFPS. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1405197. doi:3389/fpubh.2024.1405197
  17. State Council of China. Notice of the General Office of the State Council on Issuing National Drug Centralized Purchasing and Using Pilot. 2019. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2019-01/17/content_5358604.htm. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  18. National Health Security Administration. Opinions on Expanding the Pilot Program of National Organized Drug Centralized Procurement and Use by Nine Departments including the National Healthcare Security Administration. 2019. http://www.nhsa.gov.cn/art/2019/9/30/art_37_1817.html. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  19. Anderson TS, Wray CM, Jing B, et al. Intensification of older adults' outpatient blood pressure treatment at hospital discharge: national retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2018;362:k3503. doi:1136/bmj.k3503
  20. Wang JG, Zhang W, Li Y, Liu L. Hypertension in China: epidemiology and treatment initiatives. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20(8):531-545. doi:1038/s41569-022-00829-z
  21. Fu H, Li L, Yip W. Intended and unintended impacts of price changes for drugs and medical services: evidence from China. Soc Sci Med. 2018;211:114-122. doi:1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.007
  22. Tianjin Healthcare Security Administration. Implementing Long-term Prescriptions to Assist in Epidemic Prevention and Control. 2020. https://ylbz.tj.gov.cn/xwzx/ylbzxx/202009/t20200916_3701440.html. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  23. Tianjin Development and Reform Commission. Municipal Development and Reform Commission, Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission, and Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau Regarding the Cancellation of Drug Markup in Public Hospitals and the Streamlining of Medical Service Pricing. 2016. https://fzgg.tj.gov.cn/zwgk_47325/zcfg_47338/zcwjx/fgwj/202012/t20201219_5067900.html. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  24. Xiao H, Dai X, Wagenaar BH, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health services utilization in China: time-series analyses for 2016-2020. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021;9:100122. doi:1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100122
  25. National Burea of Statistics of China. Consumer Price Index. 2024. https://data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. Accessed April 15, 2024.
  26. Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):348-355. doi:1093/ije/dyw098
  27. Hox J, Moerbeek M, van de Schoot R. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017. doi:4324/9781315650982
  28. Brown VA. An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci. 2021;4(1):2515245920960351. doi:1177/2515245920960351
  29. Zhang F, Wagner AK, Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D. Methods for estimating confidence intervals in interrupted time series analyses of health interventions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):143-148. doi:1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.007
  30. Haneuse S, Dominici F, Normand SL, Schrag D. Assessment of between-hospital variation in readmission and mortality after cancer surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(6):e183038. doi:1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3038
  31. Fox J, Weisberg S. Time-Series Regression and Generalized Least Squares in R. 2011.
  32. Bottomley C, Ooko M, Gasparrini A, Keogh RH. In praise of Prais-Winsten: an evaluation of methods used to account for autocorrelation in interrupted time series. Stat Med. 2023;42(8):1277-1288. doi:1002/sim.9669
  33. Xiao H, Augusto O, Wagenaar BH. Reflection on modern methods: a common error in the segmented regression parameterization of interrupted time-series analyses. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(3):1011-1015. doi:1093/ije/dyaa148
  34. Li YS, Kang QF, Han YQ, Ding RF. Study on the policy effect of drug quantity purchase on patients' medical burden. Health Econ Res. 2021;38(4):28-32.
  35. Hu HY, Mu GL, Cao HM. The impact of national volume-based procurement policy on health expenditures for diabetes inpatients. Chinese Health Resources. 2023;26(2):163-166. doi:13688/j.cnki.chr.2023.230048
  36. McGuire TG. Physician agency. In: Culyer AJ, Newhouse JP, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Vol 1. Elsevier; 2000:461-536. doi:1016/s1574-0064(00)80168-7
  37. Wang X, He X, Zhang P, et al. The impact of the national volume-based procurement policy on the use of policy-related drugs in Nanjing: an interrupted time-series analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):200. doi:1186/s12939-023-02006-1
  38. Zhao B, Wu J. Impact of China's national volume-based procurement on drug procurement price, volume, and expenditure: an interrupted time series analysis in Tianjin. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:7724. doi:34172/ijhpm.2023.7724
  39. Section of Interventional Cardiology of Chinese Society of Cardiology. [Guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of stable coronary artery disease]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2018;46(9):680-694. doi:3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.09.004
  40. Chinese Diabetes Society. Guideline for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in China (2020 edition). Chin J Diabetes Mellitus. 2021;13(4):315-409. doi:3760/cma.j.cn115791-20210221-00095
  41. Li JJ, Zhao SP, Zhao D, et al. 2023 Chinese guideline for lipid management. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1190934. doi:3389/fphar.2023.1190934
  42. Writing Group of 2018 Chinese Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. 2018 Chinese guidelines for the management of hypertension. Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases. 2019(01):24-56.
  43. Zhang W, Xu Q, Peng J, et al. Problems and challenges encountered by Chinese medical institutions in implementing the national centralized drug procurement. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1233491. doi:3389/fphar.2023.1233491
  44. Vogler S, Haasis MA, van den Ham R, Humbert T, Garner S, Suleman F. European collaborations on medicine and vaccine procurement. Bull World Health Organ. 2021;99(10):715-721. doi:2471/blt.21.285761
  45. Kim SW, Skordis-Worrall J. Can voluntary pooled procurement reduce the price of antiretroviral drugs? a case study of Efavirenz. Health Policy Plan. 2017;32(4):516-526. doi:1093/heapol/czw165
  46. Rahimi S. Expansion of bulk-buy drug programme in China. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(10):e564. doi:1016/s1470-2045(19)30572-8
  • Receive Date: 16 April 2024
  • Revise Date: 11 March 2025
  • Accept Date: 05 April 2025
  • First Publish Date: 07 April 2025