Bridging Environmental Impact and Patient Outcomes; Comment on “A Review of the Applicability of Current Green Practices in Healthcare Facilities”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

1 Griffith Institute for Human and Environmental Resilience (GIHER), Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2 School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

The intersection of healthcare sustainability and clinical practice presents complex challenges in implementing circular economy (CE) principles. This commentary examines Soares et al.'s review of green practices in healthcare facilities while identifying significant gaps in the current discourse. While healthcare facilities are adopting sustainability measures like renewable energy and efficiency improvements, the implementation faces significant operational challenges, particularly in embedding environmental considerations in the clinical decision-making and care delivery process. The analysis discusses that overdiagnosis and low-value care contribute substantially to healthcare's environmental footprint, exemplified through screening cases that demonstrate the delicate balance between clinical necessity and resource utilisation. We emphasize the need for context-specific approaches that acknowledge operational realities and stakeholder diversity within healthcare governance. We advocate for an integrated approach that places health outcomes at the center of climate initiatives, recognising that public health interventions must equally consider environmental impacts. Ultimately, we call for a paradigm shift that moves beyond siloed environmental initiatives toward systemic integration that complements rather than competes with clinical responsibilities.

Keywords



Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 14 July 2025
  • Received Date: 08 April 2025
  • Revised Date: 13 July 2025
  • Accepted Date: 13 July 2025
  • First Published Date: 14 July 2025