Document Type : Correspondence
We are grateful for the six commentaries on our editorial. The responses by Anonymous,1 BlackDeer,2 Ge,3 Muller,4 Orr and Zielinska,5 and Veronese et al6 extend and sharpen the arguments we advanced, pressing them in directions we had not fully pursued. What follows takes up three lines of inquiry that emerge with particular force from that exchange: the inadequacy of decolonizing rhetoric in the face of ongoing genocide; the politics of knowledge production and the coloniality of global health; and the demands of moral and political clarity. ...(Read more...)