Coordinating Healthcare and Long-term Care: A FourCountry Comparison

Wendt, Claus; Willis, Eva

Coordinating Healthcare and Long-term Care: A FourCountry Comparison

Articles in Press

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Claus Wendt ¹

Eva Willis ²

¹ Chair of Sociology of Health and Healthcare Systems, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

² Sociology of Health and Healthcare Systems, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

Abstract

Background
This comparative study examines responsibilities for coordination of healthcare and long-term care (LTC) in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland. As populations age, frailty and multimorbidity are increasing, leading to greater care needs and coordination of care between sectors. We analyze how coordination responsibilities among healthcare professionals and organizations vary between different healthcare and LTC systems and what strategies are used for better coordination.

Methods
Fifty qualitative expert interviews were conducted with participants from local government agencies, social health insurances, various healthcare organizations, and professionals directly involved in healthcare and LTC provision. Data were analyzed with qualitative content analysis. The comparative research is based on existing healthcare and LTC typologies.

Results
This study shows the need for clear lines of responsibilities and financial allocation to minimize fragmentation of care coordination. Sweden and the Netherlands assign formal coordination roles to general practitioners (GPs), district nurses, and municipal services. Germany’s approach heavily relies on the family, and in Switzerland, public and private LTC providers are often responsible for coordination. Digital technologies are increasingly used for communication and coordination. In Germany and Switzerland, where GPs have no gatekeeping role and primary healthcare centers are less developed, older GPs are unwilling to invest in digitalization. In Sweden and the Netherlands, where GPs coordinate primary healthcare and referrals to specialists, there is a strong interest in digitalization to improve communication and coordination. Still, digital systems for healthcare and LTC are not fully harmonized.

Conclusion
The comparative study shows the need for clear responsibilities, systemic support, and financial recognition of care coordination to facilitate patient-centered care coordination. Digital technologies and in particularly integrated electronic records across sectors are reported as important tools that can facilitate care coordination across healthcare and LTC.

Keywords

Coordination

Healthcare

Long-term Care

Digitalization

Comparison

Typologies

1. Mackenbach JP. Health Inequalities: Persistence and Change in European Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019.

2. Bahle T, Aarians M, Koch K, Wendt C. Healthcare and Elderly Care in Europe: Institutions, Challenges, and Solutions for Better Coordination. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2023. doi:10.4337/9781802204070

3. Gittell JH, Weiss L. Coordination Networks Within and Across Organizations: A Multi-level Framework. Journal of Management Studies, 2004;41(1):127-153. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00424.x

4. Singer SJ, Kerrissey M, Friedberg M, Phillips R. A Comprehensive Theory of Integration. Med Care Res Rev. 202;77(2):196-207. doi:10.1177/1077558718767000

5. Skrove GK, Bachmann K, Aarseth T. Integrated care pathways—A strategy towards better care coordination in municipalities? A qualitative study. Int J Care Coord. 2016;19(1-2):20-28. doi:10.1177/2053434516649777

6. Vassbotn AD, Sjøvik H, Tjerbo T, Frich J, Spehar I. General practitioners’ perspectives on care coordination in primary health care: A qualitative study. Int J Care Coord. 2018;21(4):153-159. doi:10.1177/2053434518816792

7. Agerholm J, Pulkki J, Jensen NK, et al. The organisation and responsibility for care for older people in Denmark, Finland and Sweden: outline and comparison of care systems. Scand J Public Health. 2024;52(2):119-122. doi:10.1177/14034948221137128

8. Persson, MH, Søndergaard J, Mogensen CB, Skjøt-Arkil H, Andersen PT. Healthcare professionals’ experiences and attitudes to care coordination across health sectors: An interview study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):509. doi:10.1186/s12877-022-03200-6

9. Stumm J, Thierbach C, Peter L, et al. Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20:160. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-1048-y

10. Wendt C. Mapping European healthcare systems. A comparative analysis of financing, service provision, and access to healthcare. J Eur Soc Policy. 2009;19(5):432-445. doi:10.1177/0958928709344247

11. Reibling N, Ariaans M, Wendt C. Worlds of healthcare: A healthcare system typology of OECD countries. Health Policy. 2019;123(7):611-620. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.001

12. Kraus M, Riedel M, Mot E, Willemé P, Röhrling G, Czypionka T. A typology of long-term care systems in Europe. 2010. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/105160/. Accessed April 2, 2025.

13. Ariaans M, Linden P, Wendt C. Worlds of long-term care: A typology of OECD countries. Health Policy. 2021;125(5):609-617. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.02.009

14. Rothgang H, Cacace M, Frisina L, Grimmeisen M, Schmid M, Wendt C. The State and Healthcare. Comparing OECD Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.

15. Clemens T, Michelsen K, Commers M, Garel P, Dowdeswell B, Brand H. European hospital reforms in times of crisis: Aligning cost containment needs with plans for structural redesign? Health Policy. 2014;117(1):6-14. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.03.008

16. Ramamonjiarivelo Z, Weech-Maldonad, R, Hearld L, Pradhan R, Davlyatov GK. The privatization of public hospitals: Its impact on financial performance. Med Care Res Rev. 2020;77(3):249-260. doi:10.1177/1077558718781606

17. Wendt C. Social health insurance in Europe: Basic concepts and new principles. J. Health Politics Policy Law. 2019;44(4):665-677. doi:10.1215/03616878-7530837

18. Kruse FM, Stadhouders NW, Adang EM, Groenewoud S, Jeurissen PPT. Do private hospitals outperform public hospitals regarding efficiency, accessibility, and quality of care in the European Union? A literature review. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2018;33(2). doi:10.1002/hpm.2502

19. Reibling N, Wendt C. Gatekeeping and provider choice in OECD healthcare systems. Curr Sociol. 2012;60(4):489-505. doi:10.1177/0011392112438333

20. Bergman MA, Johansson P, Lundberg S, Spagnolo G. Privatization and quality: Evidence from elderly care in Sweden. J Health Econ. 2020;49:109-119. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.06.010

21. Goodair B, Reeves A. The effect of health-care privatisation on the quality of care. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9(3):e199-e206. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(24)00003-3

22. Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, Bruijnzeels MA. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010. doi:10.5334/ijic.886

23. Valentijn PP. Rainbow of Chaos: A study into the Theory and Practice of Integrated Primary Care: Pim P. Valentijn, [S.l.: s.n.], 2015 (Print Service Ede), pp. 195, Doctoral Thesis Tilburg University, The Netherlands, ISBN: 978-94-91602-40-5. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2):3. doi:10.5334/ijic.2465

24. Esping-Andersen G. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.

25. Korpi W. Faces of inequality: Gender, class, and patterns of inequalities in different types of welfare states. Soc Polit. 2000;7(2):127-191. doi:10.1093/sp/7.2.127

26. Burau V, Blank RH. Comparing health policy: An assessment of typologies of health systems. In: Geva-May I, Peters BG, Muhleisen J, eds. Policy Sectors in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies. Milton Park: Routledge; 2020:46-59.

27. Reibling N. Healthcare systems in Europe: towards an incorporation of patient access. J Eur Soc Policy. 2010;20(1):5-18. doi:10.1177/0958928709352406

28. Wendt C, Kohl J, Mischke M, Pfeifer M. How do Europeans perceive their healthcare system? Patterns of satisfaction and preference for state involvement in the field of healthcare. Eur Sociol Rev. 2010;26(2):177-192. doi:10.1093/esr/jcp014

29. Missinne S, Meuleman B, Bracke P. The popular legitimacy of European healthcare systems: a multilevel analysis of 24 countries. J Eur Soc Policy. 2013;23(3):231-247. doi:10.1177/0958928713480065

30. Levesque JF, Harris MF, Russell G. Patient-centred access to health care: conceptualising access at the interface of health systems and populations. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:1-9. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-12-18

31. Beckfield J, Olafsdottir S, Sosnaud B. Healthcare systems in comparative perspective: classification, convergence, institutions, inequalities, and five missed turns. Annu Rev Sociol. 2013;39:127-146. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145609

32. Rydland HT, Fjær EL, Eikemo TA, et al. Educational inequalities in mortality amenable to healthcare. A comparison of European healthcare systems. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0234135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234135

33. Ferreira PL, Tavares AI, Quintal C, Santana P. EU health systems classification: a new proposal from EURO-HEALTHY. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):511. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3323-3

34. Wendt C. Changing Healthcare System Types. SP&A. 2014;48(7):864-88. doi:10.1111/spol.12061

35. Yu S. Studying the health care systems in seven East Asian countries by the cluster analysis. Dev Soc. 2014;43(1):81-107. doi:10.21588/dns.2014.43.1.004

36. Colombo F. Typology of public coverage for long-term care in OECD countries. In: Costa-Font J, Courbage C, eds. Financing Long-Term Care in Europe. London: Palgrave; 2012:17-40. doi:10.1057/9780230349193_2

37. Emmel N. Sampling and Choosing Cases in Qualitative Research: A Realist Approach. London: Sage; 2013. doi:10.4135/9781473913882.n3

38. Patton MQ. Sampling, Qualitative (Purposeful). In: Ritzer G, ed. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Wiley; 2015. doi:10.1002/9781405165518.wbeoss012.pub2

39. Bogner A, Littig B, Menz W. Interviews mit Experten. Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19416-5_4

40. Schreier M. Qualitative content analysis. In: Atkinson P, Delamont S, Cernat A, Sakshaug JS, Williams RA, eds. SAGE Research Methods Foundations. London: SAGE Publications; 2019. doi:10.4135/9781526421036753373

41. Wassermann S. Das qualitative Experteninterview. In: Niederberger M, Wassermann S, eds. Methoden der Experten- und Stakeholdereinbindung in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2015:51-67. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-01687-6_4

42. Kuckartz U. Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice & Using Software. London: SAGE Publications; 2014. doi:10.4135/9781446288719.n5

43. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz; 2015.

44. Joumard I, Andre C, Nicq C. Health care systems: Efficiency and institutions. OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No. 769. 2010. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1616546

45. Janlöv N, Blume S, Glenngård AH, Hanspers K, Anell A, Merkur S. Sweden: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition. 2023;25(4):1-236.

46. Donald F, Martin-Misener R, Carter N, Donald EE, Kaasalainen S, Wickson-Griffiths A, Lloyd M, Akhtar-Danesh N, DiCenso A. A systematic review of the effectiveness of advanced practice nurses in long-term care. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(10):2148-2161. doi:10.1111/jan.12140

47. Karam M, Chouinard MC, Poitras ME, Couturier Y, Vedel I, Grgurevic N, Hudon C. Nursing care coordination for patients with complex needs in primary healthcare: A scoping review. Int J Integr Care. 2021;21(1):16. doi:10.5334/ijic.5518

48. Valokivi H, Carlo S, Kvist E, Outila M. Digital ageing in Europe: a comparative analysis of Italian, Finnish and Swedish national policies on eHealth. Ageing Soc. 2023;43:835-856. doi:10.1017/S0144686X21000945

49. Unger J-P, De Paepe P. Commercial health care financing: The cause of U.S., Dutch, and Swiss health systems inefficiency? Int J Health Serv. 2019;49(3):431-456. doi:10.1177/0020731419847113

50. Wendt C. Krankenversicherung oder Gesundheitsversorgung? Gesundheitssysteme im Vergleich. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2013.

51. Jeffery N, Donald F, Martin-Misener R, et al. A comparative analysis of teaching and evaluation methods in nurse practitioner education programs in Australia, Canada, Finland, Norway, the Netherlands and USA. Int J Nurs Educ. 2020;17(1). doi:10.1515/ijnes-2019-0047

52. OECD Health Statistics. 2025. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/. Accessed April 2, 2025.

53. Glenngård AH. The Swedish health care system. In: Tikkanen R, Osborn R, Mossialos E, Djordjevic A, Wharton G, eds. International Profiles of Health Care Systems 2020. New York: The Commonwealth Fund; 2020:181-189.

54. Hasvold T. Sweden. In: Kringos DS, Boerma WGW, Hutchinson A, Saltman RB, eds. Building Primary Care in a Changing Europe. Case Studies. Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2015:265–273. Observatory Studies Series: No. 40.

55. Modin S, Törnkvist L, Furhoff A‑K, Hylander I. Family physicians’ experiences when collaborating with district nurses in home care-based medical treatment. A grounded theory study. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:82. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-11-82

56. Josefsson K, Peltonen S. District nurses’ experience of working in home care in Sweden. Healthy Aging Res. 2015;4(37):1-8.

57. Lagerin A, Törnkvist L, Fastbom J, Lundh L. District nurses’ experiences of using a clinical decision support system and an assessment tool at elderly care units in primary health care: A qualitative study. Prim Heath Care Res Dev. 2021;22:1-7. doi:10.1017/S1463423621000530

58. Maarse H, Jeurissen PPT. The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands. Health Policy. 2016;120(3):241–245. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014

59. Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner. Hälso- och sjukvårdsrapporten 2021. Om läget och utvecklingen i hälso- och sjukvården. Stockholm. https://rka.nu/download/18.5627773817e39e979ef3874a/1642165297755/7585-936-1.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2025. Published 2021.

60. Trisan. Die Pflege älterer Personen in Deutschland, Frankreich und der Schweiz. https://www.trisan.org/fileadmin/PDFs_Dokumente/2018-05-Themenheft_Pflege-a%CC%88lterer-Personen_DE.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2025. Published October 2018.

61. Hämel K. Making nursing homes more community-oriented: Insights from an exploratory study in Germany. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(4):673-693. doi:10.1017/S0144686X14001391

62. Bahle T, Wendt C. Social assistance. In: Castles FG, Leibfried S, Lewis J, Obinger H, Pierson P, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2021:448-461.

63. Thiel R, Deimel L, Schmidtmann D, et al. #SmartHealthSystems. Digitalisierungsstrategien im internationalen Vergleich. Gütersloh; 2018. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/publikationen/publikation/did/smarthealthsystems. Accessed April 2, 2025.

64. Cijvat CD, Cornet R, Hägglund M. Factors influencing development and implementation of patients’ access to electronic health records - a comparative study of Sweden and the Netherlands. Front Public Health. 2021;9:621210. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.621210

65. Törnqvist J, Törnvall E, Jansson I. Double documentation in electronic health records. Nord J Nurs Res. 2016;36(2):88-94. doi:10.1177/2057158515625368