International Journal of Health Policy and Management

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

How Pronatalist Framing of Family Policies in Iran and Türkiye Have Unwittingly Entrenched the Medicalization of Childbirth

Document Type : Letter to Editor

Authors
1 Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Science, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye
2 Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Keywords

Dear Editor,

 

An expanding array of low-fertility societies across the Global North and Global South have recently turned toward renewed family explicitly pronatalist policy agendas,1 a shift that prominently includes Iran and Türkiye. Today, these two countries are amongst top 20 countries with the highest population with almost parallel populations. ... (Read more...)

1.     Dildar Y. The effect of pronatalist rhetoric on women's fertility preferences in Turkey. Popul Dev Rev. 2022;48(2):579-612.
2.     Vedadhir A, Lambert H. Narratives and experiences of ‘middlecut mothers’: Medicalization, conspicuous consumption, and prevalence of CS in Iran. In: BSA Medical Sociology Group Annual Conference; September 11–13, 2019; York, UK.
3.     Indicators. World Bank website. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator.  Accessed October 14, 2025.
4.     National Center for Social Monitoring/NCSM. The challenges and policy responses to low fertility in Iran. Tehran: National Center for Social Monitoring Press; 2025.
5.     Birinci Ş, Parpucu ÜM. When a caesarean section is necessary: Analysis of cesarean sections performed in the Republic of Turkey in 2022 in accordance with the World Health Organization Multi-Country Research Guidelines. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;20(3):184-190. doi:10.4274/tjod.galenos.2023.35919
6.     Asadisarvestani K, Sobotka T. A pronatalist turn in population policies in Iran and its likely adverse impacts on reproductive rights, health and inequality: a critical narrative review. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023;31(1):2257075. doi:10.1080/26410397.2023.2257075
7.     Hakimi S, Nikan F, Mahram BS, Pazani K, Gasempour A, Khalili A. Decreasing unnecessary cesarean section rate in northwest Iran: a story from achievements and challenges. Current Women's Health Reviews. 2020;16(1):23-25.
8.     Küçük M. Policy recommendations to reduce high cesarean section rate in Türkiye. Pan Afr Med J. 2024;48:83. doi:10.11604/pamj.2024.48.83.11726
9.     Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, et al. Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1349-1357. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
10. Szalma I, Pélyi L. Selective pronatalism and reproductive autonomy: Attitudes toward medically assisted reproduction in Hungary. Social Inclusion. 2025;13:10390. doi:10.17645/si.10390
11. Hašková H, Dudová R. Selective pronatalism in childcare and reproductive health policies in Czechoslovakia. The History of the Family. 2020;25(4):627-48.
12. Davis-Floyd R. The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;75 Suppl 1:S5-S23.
13. Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Saleem S. Improving pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):88. doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0524-5

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 28 July 2026

  • Received Date 25 April 2026
  • Revised Date 18 May 2026
  • Accepted Date 26 July 2026
  • First Published Date 28 July 2026
  • Published Date 28 July 2026