International Journal of Health Policy and Management

International Journal of Health Policy and Management

From Measuring Performance to Measuring What Matters: Rethinking Quality Indicators in Breast Cancer Care; Comment on “Comprehensive Evaluation of Quality Indicators: Analyzing the Dutch Breast Cancer Audit”

Document Type : Commentary

Author
Marta Maes-Carballo
Department of General Surgery, Hospital Público de Verín, Ourense, Spain
10.34172/ijhpm.10214
Abstract
Quality indicators (QIs) are central to benchmarking, accountability, and quality improvement, yet their ability to capture meaningful differences in healthcare quality cannot be assumed. Building on Verheul and colleagues’ evaluation of the Dutch NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), this commentary argues that methodological robustness is necessary but not sufficient for meaningful quality measurement. Breast cancer care involves preference-sensitive decisions for which guideline adherence, treatment rates, and clinical outcomes alone cannot define high-quality care. We propose broadening quality assessment across four complementary domains: clinical quality, patient-reported outcomes, patient experience, and decision quality, including shared decision-making (SDM) and preference concordance. Patient-centred measures used for provider comparison should undergo the same rigorous evaluation as conventional clinical indicators. The next generation of breast cancer QIs should assess clinical standards, outcomes that matter to patients, care experience, informed involvement, and concordance between care and informed preferences.

Keywords
Breast Cancer
Quality Indicators
Quality of Care
Shared Decision-Making
Patient-Centred Care
Patient-Reported Outcomes
1.     Papanicolas I, Kringos D, Klazinga NS, Smith PC. Health system performance comparison: new directions in research and policy. Health Policy. 2013;112(1-2):1-3.
2.     Rubio IT, Marotti L, Biganzoli L, et al. EUSOMA quality indicators for non-metastatic breast cancer: An update. Eur J Cancer. 2024;198:113500. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113500
3.  Verheul EM, Linde MV, Lingsma HF, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of quality indicators: analyzing the dutch breast cancer audit. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8943. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.8943
4.  van Dishoeck AM, Lingsma HF, Mackenbach JP, Steyerberg EW. Random variation and rankability of hospitals using outcome indicators. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(10):869-874. doi:10.1136/bmjqs.2010.048058
5.     Hofstede SN, Ceyisakar IE, Lingsma HF, Kringos DS, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Ranking hospitals: do we gain reliability by using composite rather than individual indicators? BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(2):94-102. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007669
6.     Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-1748.
7.     Maes-Carballo M, Gómez-Fandiño Y, Reinoso-Hermida A, et al. Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review. Breast. 2021;59:221-231. doi:10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.013
8.     Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Chang Y, et al. Measuring decision quality: psychometric evaluation of a new instrument for breast cancer surgery. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:51. doi:10.1186/1472-6947-12-51
9.   Fischer L, Wollny R, Schewe LV, et al. Integrating shared decision making and decision support tools into clinical practice guidelines: what does it take? A qualitative study. Med Decis Making. 2026;46(1):60-75. doi:10.1177/0272989X251368866
10. Lee CN, Chang Y, Adimorah N, et al. Decision making about surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):1-10. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.017
11. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;344:e256. doi:10.1136/bmj.e256
12. Elwyn G, Frosch DL, Kobrin S. Implementing shared decision-making: consider all the consequences. Implement Sci. 2016;11:114. doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0480-9
13. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(10):1361-1367. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
14. Kingsley C, Patel S. Patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures. BJA Education. 2017;17(4):137-144. doi:10.1093/bjaed/mkw060
15. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). What Are Patient-Reported Measures? Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/prems-proms/index.html. 2025. 
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 15, Issue 1
2026
Pages 1-4

  • Received Date 28 July 2026
  • Revised Date 08 September 2026
  • Accepted Date 11 September 2026
  • First Published Date 29 September 2026
  • Published Date 01 December 2026