Rupture as Catalyst: The Case for Deep WHO Governance Reform; Comment on “The United States Withdrawal From the World Health Organization: Implications and Challenges”

Buse, Kent; Acharya, Shambhu

doi:10.34172/ijhpm.10068

Rupture as Catalyst: The Case for Deep WHO Governance Reform; Comment on “The United States Withdrawal From the World Health Organization: Implications and Challenges”

Document Type : Commentary

Authors

Kent Buse ¹

Shambhu Acharya ²

¹ Department of Global Population Health, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

² Independent Researcher, Kathmandu, Nepal

10.34172/ijhpm.10068

Abstract

US withdrawal from World Health Organization (WHO) in 2026 is widely framed as a crisis to be managed toward eventual membership restoration. We argue the opposite: geopolitical rupture has created the first genuine political opening for deep governance reform of an institution whose architecture has, for decades, enabled dominant funders to shape priorities. The burden-sharing critique of Global South non-engagement is reframed as a legitimacy deficit: countries have contributed pathogen samples, data, and biological materials to global systems while watching the resulting benefits captured by high-income states and their manufacturers, as illustrated by H5N1, COVID-19 vaccine inequity, and the unresolved Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) annex of the Pandemic Agreement. Seven interdependent reforms are identified spanning earmarking caps, assessed contributions, a single non-renewable Director-General term, a global common framing, civil society oversight, Executive Board (EB) reform, and regional director appointments. Our argument is that the rupture has disturbed the conditions that made structural change unlikely, and that durable legitimacy is more achievable now than at any prior moment.

Keywords

Global Health Governance

Health Geopolitics

WHO Reform

1. Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Haghdoost AA, McKee M, et al. The United States withdrawal from the World Health Organization: implications and challenges. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:9086. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.9086

2. McKee M, Buse K. How should the next WHO director general confront the new world order? BMJ. 2026;393:e932172. doi:10.1136/bmj-2026-932172

3. KFF. The U.S. Government and the World Health Organization. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/fact-sheet/the-u-s-government-and-the-world-health-organization/. Published March 17, 2026.

4. Iwunna O, Kennedy J, Harmer A. Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors' voluntary contributions. BMJ Glob Health. 2023;8:e011232. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2022-011232

5. Secretariat to The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response. World Health Organization: an institutional review. Background paper 15. https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Background-paper-15-WHO-Institutional-review.pdf. Published May 2021.

6. Development Today. WHO Investment Round: a disappointing but predictable outcome. https://www.development-today.com/archive/2024/dt-9--2024/who-investment-round-a-disappointing-but-predictable-outcome. Published November 29, 2024.

7. OECD. Development Co-operation Profiles: Saudi Arabia. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2025. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/development-co-operation-profiles_04b376d7-en/saudi-arabia_8d6207ae-en.html.

8. Sedyaningsih ER, Isfandari S, Soendoro T, Supari SF. Towards mutual trust, transparency and equity in virus sharing mechanism: the avian influenza case of Indonesia. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2008;37(6):482-488.

9. WHO. World Health Assembly adopts historic Pandemic Agreement. https://www.who.int/news/item/20-05-2025-world-health-assembly-adopts-historic-pandemic-agreement-to-make-the-world-more-equitable-and-safer-from-future-pandemics. Published May 20, 2025.

10. Radeino Ambe J, Bhan A, Silaigwana B, et al. Pathogen access and benefit sharing in a pandemic: working towards fair exchange? Lancet Microbe. 2026;7(5):101376. doi:10.1016/j.lanmic.2026.101376

11. Accra Reset. Resetting global development cooperation for a post-dependency world. https://accrareset.org. Published August 2025.

12. Nordström A, Robalo Correia E Silva M, Clark H, Minghui R, Piot P, Teo YY. Four paradigm shifts to shape an agenda for global health reforms. Lancet. 2026;407(10529):655-657. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02634-0

13. WHO. Sustainable financing: decision WHA75(8). Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly; May 24, 2022. https://www.who.int/news/item/24-05-2022-world-health-assembly-agrees-historic-decision-to-sustainably-finance-who.

14. Caixin/Nikkei Asia. $500m pledge makes China top WHO donor after US withdrawal. https://asia.nikkei.com/spotlight/caixin/500m-pledge-makes-china-top-who-donor-after-us-withdrawal. Published May 23, 2025.

15. Musuva A, Offosse MJ, Ssennyonjo A. Advancing the Lusaka Agenda: the Global Financing Facility's missed opportunities for catalysing sustainable health investment. Glob Health Action. 2025;18(1). doi:10.1080/16549716.2025.2555052

16. Statista. Largest contributors to the World Health Organization (WHO) from 2024 to 2025, by fund type. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1456464/largest-donors-who. Published February 4, 2026.

17. United Nations General Assembly. Scale of assessments for the apportionment of the expenses of the United Nations. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 24 December 2024. https://docs.un.org/en/A/RES/79/249.

18. WHO. Executive Board approves revised WHO Evaluation Policy (2025). https://www.who.int/news/item/19-08-2025-executive-board-approves-revised-who-evaluation-policy-(2025). Published August 19, 2025.

19. World Health Organization. Reform of the global health architecture and the UN80 Initiative: a joint process to support reforms. Report by the Director-General. Document A79/24. https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA79/A79_24-en.pdf. Published May 7, 2026.

20. Horton R. Offline: The dishonest politics of global health. Lancet. 2026;407(10544):2157. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(26)01039-1