Community Psychology as a Process of Citizen Participation in Health Policy; Comment on “The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy”

Document Type : Commentary


School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, UK


This brief commentary discusses a recent paper by Speed and Mannion that explores “The Rise of post truth populism in liberal democracies: challenges for health policy.” It considers their assertion that through meaningful democratic engagement in health policy, some of the risks brought about by an exclusionary populist politics can be mediated. With an overview of what participation means in modern healthcare policy and implementation, the field of community psychology is presented as one way to engage marginalized groups at risk of exploitation or exclusion by nativist populist policy.


Main Subjects

  1. Speed E, Mannion R. The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: challenges for health policy. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(5):249-251. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.19
  2. Howarth D, ed. Ernesto Laclau: Post-marxism, Populism and Critique. Routledge; 2015.
  3. Morone JA, Kilbreth EH. Power to the people? Restoring citizen participation. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2003;28(2-3):271-288.
  4. Demil B, Lecocq X. Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The Emergence of Bazaar Governance. Organ Stud. 2006;27:1447-1466. doi:10.1177/0170840606067250
  5. Hall, M. Boris Johnson urges Brits to vote Brexit to “Take back control”. The Express. June 20, 2016.  Accessed April 22, 2017.
  6. Carter P, Martin G. Challenges facing Healthwatch, a new consumer champion in England. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(4):259-263. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.07
  7. Lupton D. The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(6):856-869. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12109
  8. Beresford, P. All our welfare: Towards participatory social policy. UK: Policy Press; 2016.
  9. Orford J. Community Psychology: Challenges, Controversies and Emerging Consensus. London: Wiley; 2008.
  10. Sedgwick P. Psycho Politics. New York: Harper & Row; 1981.
  11. Bronfenbrenner U. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. London: Harvard University Press; 1979.
  12. Burton M, Boyle S, Harris C, Kagan C. Community psychology in BritainIn: Reich S, Riemer M, Prilleltensky I, Montero M, eds. International Community Psychology: History and Theories. New York: Springer; 2007:219-237.
  13. Taggart D, McCauley C, Smithhurst S. Community psychology praxis in a Sure Start: The Great Yarmouth Father’s Project. Clin Psycho Forum. 2017;293:46-49.
  14. Holland S. From social abuse to social action: A neighbourhood psychotherapy and social action project for women. In: Ussher JM, Nicolson P, eds. Gender Issues in Clinical Psychology. London: Routledge; 1992:68-77.
  15. Franks W, Gawn N, Bowden G. Barriers to access to mental health services for migrant workers, refugees and asylum seekers. J Public Ment Health. 2007;6(1):33-41.
  16. Garnets LD, D’Augelli AR. Empowering gay and lesbian communities: A call for collaboration with community psychology. Am J Community Psychol. 1994;22:447-470.
  17. Hoffman L. Beyond power and control: Toward a “second order” family systems therapy. Fam Syst Med. 1985;4(3):381-396. doi:10.1037/h0089674
  18. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin: Harmondsworth; 1972.
  19. Ledwith M. Community Development: A Critical Approach. Bristol: Policy Press; 2005.
  20. Wright B. Consumers or citizens: Whose voice will Healthwatch represent and will it matter? Comment on “Challenges facing Healthwatch: A new consumer champion in England. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016;5(11):667-669. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2016.84