Health Taxes on Tobacco, Alcohol, Food and Drinks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review of Policy Content, Actors, Process and Context

Document Type: Review Article

Authors

1 College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia

2 School of Public Health & Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3 Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

4 Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK

5 Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Background
Taxation of tobacco, food, alcohol and other beverages has gained renewed attention in responding to non-communicable diseases (NCDs). While largely built on evidence from high-income countries (HICs), the projected economic and health benefits of these measures have increased calls for their use in price-sensitive low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, uptake has been sporadic and there remains little research on why and how LMICs utilise fiscal measures in response to NCDs.
 
Methods
This scoping review analyses factors influencing the design and implementation of health-related fiscal measures in LMICs. Utilising Arksey and O’Malley’s scoping review methodology and Walt and Gilson’s policy triangle, we considered the contextual, procedural, content and stakeholder-related factors that influenced measures.
 
Results
We identified 75 papers focussing on health-related fiscal measures, with 47 (63%) focused on tobacco, 5 on alcohol, 6 on soft drink and 4 studies on food-related fiscal regulation. Thirteen papers analysed multiple measures and most papers (n = 66, 88%) were less than a decade old. Key factors enabling the design and implementation of measures included localised health and economic evidence, policy championing, inter-ministerial support, and global or regional momentum. Impeding factors encompassed negative framing and retaliation by industry, vested interests and governmental policy disjuncture. Aligning with theoretic insights from the policy triangle, findings consistently demonstrated that the interplay between factors – rather than the presence or absence of particular factors – has the most profound impact on policy implementation.
 
Conclusion
Given the growing urgency to address NCDs in LMICs, this review highlights the need for recognition and rigorous exploration of political economy factors influencing the design and implementation of fiscal measures. Broader LMIC-specific empirical research is needed to overcome an implication noted in much of the literature: that mechanisms used to enact tobacco taxation are universally applicable to measures targeting foods, alcohol and other beverages.

Keywords


  1. Allen L, Cobiac L, Townsend N. Quantifying the global distribution of premature mortality from non-communicable diseases. J Public Health (Oxf). 2017;39(4):698-703. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdx008
  2. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable Diseases: The Slow-Motion Disaster. Geneva: WHO; 2017:91-105.
  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable Diseases Country Profiles 2018. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  4. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  5. United Nations General Assembly. Political Declaration of the Third High-Level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: United Nations General Assembly; 2018.
  6. World Economic Forum, World Health Organization (WHO). From Burden to "Best Buys": Reducing the Economic Impact of Non-Communicable Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Geneva: World Economic Forum, WHO; 2011.
  7. Buse K, Tanaka S, Hawkes S. Healthy people and healthy profits? Elaborating a conceptual framework for governing the commercial determinants of non-communicable diseases and identifying options for reducing risk exposure. Global Health. 2017;13(1):34. doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0255-3
  8. Thow AM, Snowdon W, Labonté R, et al. Will the next generation of preferential trade and investment agreements undermine prevention of noncommunicable diseases? a prospective policy analysis of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement. Health Policy. 2015;119(1):88-96. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.08.002
  9. Kickbusch I, Allen L, Franz C. The commercial determinants of health. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(12):e895-e896. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(16)30217-0
  10. United Nations Development Programme. Discussion Paper: Addressing the Social Determinants of Non-Communicable Diseases. New York: United Nations Development Programme; 2013.
  11. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Closing the Gap in A Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final report of the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  12. Lee K, Crosbie E. Understanding structure and agency as commercial determinants of health: Comment on "How neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;9(7):315-318. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.127
  13. World Health Organization (WHO). Time to Deliver: Report of the WHO Independent High-Level Commission on Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  14. Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: W. Strahan & T. Cadell; 1776.
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). Fiscal Policies for Diet and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases: Technical Meeting Report, 5-6 May 2015. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  16. Sugar, tobacco, and alcohol taxes to achieve the SDGs. Lancet. 2018;391(10138):2400-2401. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31219-4
  17. World Health Organization (WHO). Framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Strategy to Reduce the Harmful Use of Alcohol. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Status Report on Alcohol and Health 2018. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  20. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2019. Geneva: WHO; 2019.
  21. Roache SA, Gostin LO. The untapped power of soda taxes: incentivizing consumers, generating revenue, and altering corporate behavior. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(9):489-493. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.69
  22. World Cancer Research Fund. Building Momentum: Lessons on Implementing A Robust Sugar Sweetened Beverage Tax. London: World Cancer Research Fund; 2018.
  23. Global Food Research Program. Sugary Drink Taxes Around the World. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina; 2019.
  24. Hagenaars LL, Jeurissen PPT, Klazinga NS. The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): an overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies. Health Policy. 2017;121(8):887-894. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.011
  25. Wright A, Smith KE, Hellowell M. Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):583. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z
  26. Allen LN, Pullar J, Wickramasinghe KK, et al. Evaluation of research on interventions aligned to WHO 'Best Buys' for NCDs in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review from 1990 to 2015. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(1):e000535. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000535
  27. Isaranuwatchai W, Teerawattananon Y, Archer RA, et al. Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys. BMJ. 2020;368:m141. doi:10.1136/bmj.m141
  28. Le Bodo Y, De Wals P. Soda taxes: the importance of analysing policy processes: Comment on "The Untapped power of soda taxes: incentivising consumers, generating revenue, and altering corporate behaviours." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(5):470-473. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.126
  29. Roache SA, Gostin LO. Tapping the power of soda taxes: a call for multidisciplinary research and broad-based advocacy coalitions - a response to the recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(7):674-676. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2018.30
  30. Nakhimovsky SS, Feigl AB, Avila C, O'Sullivan G, Macgregor-Skinner E, Spranca M. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce overweight and obesity in middle-income countries: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163358. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163358
  31. Sassi F, Belloni A, Mirelman AJ, et al. Equity impacts of price policies to promote healthy behaviours. Lancet. 2018;391(10134):2059-2070. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30531-2
  32. Sornpaisarn B, Shield K, Cohen J, Schwartz R, Rehm J. Elasticity of alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harms, and drinking initiation in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Alcohol Drug Res. 2013;2(1):45-58. doi:10.7895/ijadr.v2i1.50
  33. Bump JB, Reich MR. Political economy analysis for tobacco control in low- and middle-income countries. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(2):123-133. doi:10.1093/heapol/czs049
  34. Bridge G, Lomazzi M, Bedi R. Implementation of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax in low- and middle-income countries: recommendations for policymakers. J Public Health Policy. 2020;41(1):84-97. doi:10.1057/s41271-019-00196-z
  35. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
  36. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Huberman AM, Miles MB, eds. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. London: Sage; 2002:305-331.
  37. NVivo Qualitative Data Analysis Software [computer program]. Version 12: QSR International; 2018.
  38. Walt G, Gilson L. Reforming the health sector in developing countries: the central role of policy analysis. Health Policy Plan. 1994;9(4):353-370. doi:10.1093/heapol/9.4.353
  39. Downs SM, Thow AM, Ghosh-Jerath S, McNab J, Reddy KS, Leeder SR. From Denmark to Delhi: the multisectoral challenge of regulating trans fats in India. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(12):2273-2280. doi:10.1017/s1368980012004995
  40. Leichter H. A Comparative Approach to Policy Analysis: Health Care Policy in Four Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1979.
  41. World Bank Group. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519.  Accessed March 7, 2019. Published 2019.
  42. World Health Organization (WHO). Earmarked Tobacco Taxes: Lessons Learnt from Nine Countries. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  43. Cashin C, Sparkes S, Bloom D. Earmarking for Health: From Theory to Practice. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  44. Chavez JJ. Economic policy - Public health linkage and the importance of a regional platform: the case of tobacco control. Glob Soc Policy. 2015;15(3):351-354. doi:10.1177/1468018115600123f
  45. Crosbie E, Sosa P, Glantz SA. The importance of continued engagement during the implementation phase of tobacco control policies in a middle-income country: the case of Costa Rica. Tob Control. 2017;26(1):60-68. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052701
  46. Drope J, Chavez JJ, Lencucha R, McGrady B. The political economy of foreign direct investment—Evidence from the Philippines. Policy Soc. 2014;33(1):39-52. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.03.002
  47. Higashi H, Khuong TA, Ngo AD, Hill PS. Evidence and decision making: tobacco control policy and legislation in Vietnam. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013;28(1):e72-94. doi:10.1002/hpm.2135
  48. Kaiser K, Bredenkamp C, Iglesias R. Sin Tax Reform in the Philippines. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2016.
  49. Pitso JM, Obot IS. Botswana alcohol policy and the presidential levy controversy. Addiction. 2011;106(5):898-905. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03365.x
  50. Snowdon W, Thow AM. Trade policy and obesity prevention: challenges and innovation in the Pacific Islands. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:150-158. doi:10.1111/obr.12090
  51. Thow AM, Quested C, Juventin L, Kun R, Khan AN, Swinburn B. Taxing soft drinks in the Pacific: implementation lessons for improving health. Health Promot Int. 2011;26(1):55-64. doi:10.1093/heapro/daq057
  52. Vateesatokit P. Tailoring Tobacco Control Efforts to the Country: The Example of Thailand. Washington, DC: World Bank; Ottawa: Research for International Tobacco Control; 2003.
  53. Baker P, Jones A, Thow AM. Accelerating the worldwide adoption of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: strengthening commitment and capacity: Comment on "The untapped power of soda taxes: incentivizing consumers, generating revenue, and altering corporate behavior." Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(5):474-478. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.127
  54. Abedian I, van der Merwe R, Wilkins N, Jha P. The economics of tobacco control in South Africa. In: Abedian I, van der Merwe R, Wilkins N, Jha P, eds. The Economics of Tobacco Control: Towards an Optimal Policy Mix. Cape Town: Applied Fiscal Research Centre, University of Cape Town; 1998:251-271.
  55. Roubal T. Role of WHO in South Africa SSB Tax Initiative. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
  56. van Walbeek C. Tobacco Excise Taxation in South Africa. Geneva: WHO; 2003.
  57. Smith KE, Savell E, Gilmore AB. What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? a systematic review of empirical studies. Tob Control. 2013;22(2):144-153. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050098
  58. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, The Fiji National University Pacific Research Centre for the Prevention of Obesity and Non-communicable Diseases. Effects of Food Taxation in Tonga: A Snapshot. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & The Fiji National University Pacific Research Centre for the Prevention of Obesity and Non-communicable Diseases; 2017.
  59. Foster N, Thow AM, Unwin N, Alvarado M, Samuels TA. Regulatory measures to fight obesity in Small Island Developing States of the Caribbean and Pacific, 2015 - 2017. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42:e191. doi:10.26633/rpsp.2018.191
  60. Bonilla-Chacin ME, Iglesias R, Suaya A, Trezza C, Macias C. Learning from the Mexican Experience with Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Energy-dense Foods of Low Nutritional Value: Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2016.
  61. Crosbie E, Sosa P, Glantz SA. Costa Rica's implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: Overcoming decades of industry dominance. Salud Publica Mex. 2016;58(1):62-70. doi:10.21149/spm.v58i1.7669
  62. Thow AM, Reeve E, Naseri T, Martyn T, Bollars C. Food supply, nutrition and trade policy: reversal of an import ban on turkey tails. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(10):723-725. doi:10.2471/blt.17.192468
  63. Onagan FCC, Ho BLC, Chua KKT. Development of a sweetened beverage tax, Philippines. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(2):154-159. doi:10.2471/blt.18.220459
  64. Williams SN. The incursion of ‘Big Food’ in middle-income countries: a qualitative documentary case study analysis of the soft drinks industry in China and India. Crit Public Health. 2015;25(4):455-473. doi:10.1080/09581596.2015.1005056
  65. Achadi A, Soerojo W, Barber S. The relevance and prospects of advancing tobacco control in Indonesia. Health Policy. 2005;72(3):333-349. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.09.009
  66. Alechnowicz K, Chapman S. The Philippine tobacco industry: "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia." Tob Control. 2004;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii71-78. doi:10.1136/tc.2004.009324
  67. Iglesias RM. Increasing excise taxes in the presence of an illegal cigarette market: the 2011 Brazil tobacco tax reform. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016;40(4):243-249.
  68. Rosser A. Contesting tobacco-control policy in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies. 2015;47(1):69-93. doi:10.1080/14672715.2015.997083
  69. Buse K, Mays N, Walt G. Making Health Policy. 2nd ed. Berkshire: Open Universities Press; 2012.
  70. Adebiyi AO, Popoola OA. A Qualitative analysis of selected stakeholders' viewpoints on tobacco control in Nigeria. Health Promot Pract. 2018;19(4):560-565. doi:10.1177/1524839917737732
  71. Asare BE. Tobacco regulation in South Africa: interest groups and public policy. Afr J Polit Sci Int Relat. 2009;3(3):99-106.
  72. Barraclough S, Morrow M. The political economy of tobacco and poverty alleviation in Southeast Asia: contradictions in the role of the state. Glob Health Promot. 2010;17(1 Suppl):40-50. doi:10.1177/1757975909358243
  73. Bump JB, Reich MR, Adeyi O, Khetrapal S. Towards a Political Economy of Tobacco Control in Low- And Middle-Income Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2009.
  74. Higashi H, Ngo AD, Hill PS. Translating knowledge into policy: provision and use of evidence in the Tobacco Harm Prevention Law in Vietnam. J Public Health Policy. 2012;33(4):454-461. doi:10.1057/jphp.2012.28
  75. Hu TW, Lee AH, Mao Z. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in China: Barriers, Challenges and Recommendations: World Scientific Series in Global Health Economics and Public Policy, vol. 4. London and Singapore: World Scientific; 2016.
  76. Juma PA, Mapa-Tassou C, Mohamed SF, et al. Multi-sectoral action in non-communicable disease prevention policy development in five African countries. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(suppl 1):953. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5826-6
  77. MacKenzie R, Collin J. 'A preferred consultant and partner to the Royal Government, NGOs, and the community': British American Tobacco's access to policy-makers in Cambodia. Glob Public Health. 2017;12(4):432-448. doi:10.1080/17441692.2016.1170868
  78. Mapa-Tassou C, Bonono CR, Assah F, et al. Two decades of tobacco use prevention and control policies in Cameroon: results from the analysis of non-communicable disease prevention policies in Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(suppl 1):958. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5828-4
  79. Mohamed SF, Juma P, Asiki G, Kyobutungi C. Facilitators and barriers in the formulation and implementation of tobacco control policies in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(suppl 1):960. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5830-x
  80. Parry CD. Alcohol policy in South Africa: a review of policy development processes between 1994 and 2009. Addiction. 2010;105(8):1340-1345. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03003.x
  81. van Walbeek C. Tobacco control in South Africa in the 1990s: A mix of advocacy, academic research and policy. S Afr J Econ Hist. 2004;19(1-2):100-131. doi:10.1080/10113430409511172
  82. Wisdom JP, Juma P, Mwagomba B, et al. Influence of the WHO framework convention on tobacco control on tobacco legislation and policies in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(suppl 1):954. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5827-5
  83. Barber S, Ahsan A. The tobacco excise system in Indonesia: hindering effective tobacco control for health. J Public Health Policy. 2009;30(2):208-225. doi:10.1057/jphp.2009.12
  84. Malan M, Leaver R. Political Change in South Africa: New Tobacco Control and Public Health Policies. Washington, DC: World Bank; Ottawa: Research for International Tobacco Control; 2003.
  85. Walls H, Liverani M, Chheng K, Parkhurst J. The many meanings of evidence: a comparative analysis of the forms and roles of evidence within three health policy processes in Cambodia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15(1):95. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0260-2
  86. Mialon M, Swinburn B, Wate J, Tukana I, Sacks G. Analysis of the corporate political activity of major food industry actors in Fiji. Global Health. 2016;12(1):18. doi:10.1186/s12992-016-0158-8
  87. Juma PA, Mohamed SF, Matanje Mwagomba BL, et al. Non-communicable disease prevention policy process in five African countries. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(Suppl 1):961. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5825-7
  88. Drope J, Schluger NW. The Tobacco Atlas. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2018.
  89. Ferreira-Borges C, Parry CD, Babor TF. Harmful use of alcohol: a shadow over sub-Saharan Africa in need of workable solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(4). doi:10.3390/ijerph14040346
  90. Gilmore AB, Fooks G, Drope J, Bialous SA, Jackson RR. Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2015;385(9972):1029-1043. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60312-9
  91. Garcia MI, Uribe MV, Iunes R. The Political Economy of the 2016 Tobacco and Proposed Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Increases in Colombia. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group; 2017.
  92. Chantornvong S, McCargo D. Political economy of tobacco control in Thailand. Tob Control. 2001;10(1):48-54. doi:10.1136/tc.10.1.48
  93. Crosbie E, Sebrié EM, Glantz SA. Tobacco industry success in Costa Rica: the importance of FCTC article 5.3. Salud Publica Mex. 2012;54(1):28-38.
  94. Gilmore A, Collin J, Townsend J. Transnational tobacco company influence on tax policy during privatization of a state monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(11):2001-2009. doi:10.2105/ajph.2005.078378
  95. Gilmore AB. Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: an analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials. Tob Control. 2012;21(2):119-126. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050397
  96. Krasovsky KS. "The lobbying strategy is to keep excise as low as possible" - tobacco industry excise taxation policy in Ukraine. Tob Induc Dis. 2010;8(1):10. doi:10.1186/1617-9625-8-10
  97. Sanni S, Hongoro C, Ndinda C, Wisdom JP. Assessment of the multi-sectoral approach to tobacco control policies in South Africa and Togo. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(Suppl 1):962. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5829-3
  98. Mambulu FN, Mkandawire P, Dixon J, Mason S, Rishworth A, Luginaah I. Silence of the leaders: alcohol policy-making in Malawi. Afr Geogr Rev. 2015;34(3):232-249. doi:10.1080/19376812.2014.1003306
  99. Charoenca N, Mock J, Kungskulniti N, Preechawong S, Kojetin N, Hamann SL. Success counteracting tobacco company interference in Thailand: an example of FCTC implementation for low- and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(4):1111-1134. doi:10.3390/ijerph9041111
  100. Holden C, Lee K. 'A major lobbying effort to change and unify the excise structure in six Central American countries': how British American Tobacco influenced tax and tariff rates in the Central American Common Market. Global Health. 2011;7:15. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-7-15
  101. Coriakula J, Moodie M, Waqa G, Latu C, Snowdon W, Bell C. The development and implementation of a new import duty on palm oil to reduce non-communicable disease in Fiji. Global Health. 2018;14(1):91. doi:10.1186/s12992-018-0407-0
  102. Samet J, Wipfli H, Perez-Padilla R, Yach D. Mexico and the tobacco industry: doing the wrong thing for the right reason? BMJ. 2006;332(7537):353-354. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7537.353
  103. Tam J, van Walbeek C. Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference. Tob Control. 2014;23(6):518-523. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050725
  104. Higashi H, Khuong TA, Ngo AD, Hill PS. The development of Tobacco Harm Prevention Law in Vietnam: stakeholder tensions over tobacco control legislation in a state owned industry. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2011;6:24. doi:10.1186/1747-597x-6-24
  105. Chantornvong S, Collin J, Dodgson R, et al. Political economy of tobacco control in low-income and middle-income countries: lessons from Thailand and Zimbabwe. Global Analysis Project Team. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(7):913-919.
  106. Casswell S. Vested interests in addiction research and policy. Why do we not see the corporate interests of the alcohol industry as clearly as we see those of the tobacco industry? Addiction. 2013;108(4):680-685. doi:10.1111/add.12011
  107. Ross H, Tesche J, Vellios N. Undermining government tax policies: common legal strategies employed by the tobacco industry in response to tobacco tax increases. Prev Med. 2017;105S(Suppl):S19-S22. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.06.012
  108. Barbieri ME, Sarmiento OL, Díaz Del Castillo A, et al. Multisectoral Interventions to Promote Healthy Living in Latin America and the Caribbean. In: Bonilla-Chacin ME, ed. Promoting Healthy Living in Latin America and the Caribbean: Governance of Multisectoral Activities to Prevent Risk Factors for Noncommunicable Diseases. Directions in Development: Human Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2014:72-204.
  109. Hoe C, Rodriguez DC, Üzümcüoğlu Y, Hyder AA. "Quitting like a Turk:" How political priority developed for tobacco control in Turkey. Soc Sci Med. 2016;165:36-45. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.027
  110. Oladepo O, Oluwasanu M, Abiona O. Analysis of tobacco control policies in Nigeria: historical development and application of multi-sectoral action. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(suppl 1):959. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5831-9
  111. Pérez-Escamilla R, Lutter CK, Rabadan-Diehl C, et al. Prevention of childhood obesity and food policies in Latin America: from research to practice. Obes Rev. 2017;18 Suppl 2:28-38. doi:10.1111/obr.12574
  112. Owusu-Dabo E, McNeill A, Lewis S, Gilmore A, Britton J. Status of implementation of Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:1. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-1
  113. Hamann SL, Mock J, Hense S, Charoenca N, Kungskulniti N. Building tobacco control research in Thailand: meeting the need for innovative change in Asia. Health Res Policy Syst. 2012;10:3. doi:10.1186/1478-4505-10-3
  114. Berlan D, Buse K, Shiffman J, Tanaka S. The bit in the middle: a synthesis of global health literature on policy formulation and adoption. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29 Suppl 3:iii23-34. doi:10.1093/heapol/czu060
  115. Shiffman J, Smith S. Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: a framework and case study of maternal mortality. Lancet. 2007;370(9595):1370-1379. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61579-7
  116. Dearing JW, Rogers ME. Agenda-Setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996.
  117. Hill M, Hupe P. Implementing Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2009.
  118. Head BW. Policy Analysis: Evidence Based Policy-Making. In: Wright JD, ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015:281-287.
  119. Mazmanian DA, Sabatier PA. Implementation and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America; 1989.
  120. Entman RM. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. J Commun. 1993;43(4):51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  121. Jha P, Joseph R, Li D, et al. Tobacco Taxes: A Win-Win Measure for Fiscal Space and Health. Mandaluyong, Philippines: Asian Development Bank; 2012.
  122. World Bank Group. Summary of proceedings report. Paper presented at: Tobacco Taxation Win-Win for Public Health and Domestic Resources Mobilization Conference; Washington, DC; 2017.
  123. Irwin A, Marquez PV, Jha PK, et al. Tobacco Tax Reform at the Crossroads of Health and Development: Technical Report of the World Bank Group Global Tobacco Control program (Vol. 2): Main Report. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2017.
  124. Charoenca N, Kungskulniti N, Mock J, Hamann S, Vathesatogkit P. How Thailand's greater convergence created sustainable funding for emerging health priorities caused by globalization. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:28630. doi:10.3402/gha.v8.28630
  125. Salamon L, Lund M. The tools approach: basic analytics. In: Salamon L, ed. Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute; 1989:23-49.
  126. Akitoby A, Honda J, Miyamoto H, Primus K, Sy M. Case Studies in Tax Revenue Mobilization in Low-Income Countries. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund; 2019.
  127. World Health Organization (WHO). The Double Burden: Emerging Epidemics and Persistent Problems. World Health Report 1999. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
  128. Thow AM, Downs SM, Mayes C, Trevena H, Waqanivalu T, Cawley J. Fiscal policy to improve diets and prevent noncommunicable diseases: from recommendations to action. Bull World Health Organ. 2018;96(3):201-210. doi:10.2471/blt.17.195982
  129. Dorfman L, Cheyne A, Friedman LC, Wadud A, Gottlieb M. Soda and tobacco industry corporate social responsibility campaigns: how do they compare? PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001241. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001241
  130. Nguyen KH, Glantz SA, Palmer CN, Schmidt LA. Tobacco industry involvement in children's sugary drinks market. BMJ. 2019;364:l736. doi:10.1136/bmj.l736
  131. Brownell KD, Warner KE. The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food? Milbank Q. 2009;87(1):259-294. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x
  132. Schram A. When evidence isn’t enough: Ideological, institutional, and interest-based constraints on achieving trade and health policy coherence. Glob Soc Policy. 2018;18(1):62-80. doi:10.1177/1468018117744153
  133. Breton E, Richard L, Gagnon F, Jacques M, Bergeron P. Health promotion research and practice require sound policy analysis models: the case of Quebec's Tobacco Act. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1679-1689. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.028
  134. Friel S. Climate Change and the People's Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2019.
  135. Lencucha R, Thow AM. How neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(9):514-520. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.56
  136. World Bank Group. The Human Capital Project. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2018.
  137. Dalglish SL, Rodríguez DC, Harouna A, Surkan PJ. Knowledge and power in policy-making for child survival in Niger. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:150-157. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.056