Should Public Health and Policy Communities Interact With the Food Industry? It Depends on Context; Comment on “Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool”

Document Type : Commentary


1 School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia

2 MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK


The issue of public health and policy communities engaging with food sector companies has long caused tension and debate. Ralston and colleagues’ article ‘Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool’ further examines this issue. They found widespread food industry opposition, not just to the details of the World Health Organization (WHO) tool, but to the very idea of it. In this commentary we reflect on this finding and the arguments for and against interacting with the food industry during different stages of the policy process. While involving the food industry in certain aspects of the policy process without favouring their business goals may seem like an intractable problem, we believe there are opportunities for progress that do not compromise our values as public health professionals. We suggest three key steps to making progress.


  1. Ralston R, Hil SE, da Silva Gomes F, Collin J. Towards preventing and managing conflict of interest in nutrition policy? an analysis of submissions to a consultation on a draft WHO tool. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020. doi:10.34172/ijhpm.2020.52
  2. Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(14):2643-2653. doi:10.1017/s1368980016000677
  3. Adams J, Mytton O, White M, Monsivais P. Why are some population interventions for diet and obesity more equitable and effective than others? the role of individual agency. PLoS Med. 2016;13(4):e1001990. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990
  4. Sacks G, Swinburn BA, Cameron AJ, Ruskin G. How food companies influence evidence and opinion–straight from the horse’s mouth. Crit Public Health. 2018;28(2):253-256. doi:10.1080/09581596.2017.1371844
  5. Miller D, Harkins C. Corporate strategy, corporate capture: food and alcohol industry lobbying and public health. Crit Soc Policy. 2010;30(4):564-589. doi:10.1177/0261018310376805
  6. Knai C, Petticrew M, Durand MA, et al. Has a public–private partnership resulted in action on healthier diets in England? an analysis of the Public Health Responsibility Deal food pledges. Food Policy. 2015;54:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.002
  7. Greenhalgh S. Soda industry influence on obesity science and policy in China. J Public Health Policy. 2019;40(1):5-16. doi:10.1057/s41271-018-00158-x
  8. Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Exploring power and influence in nutrition policy in Australia. Obes Rev. 2016;17(12):1218-1225. doi:10.1111/obr.12459
  9. Steele S, Ruskin G, Stuckler D. Pushing partnerships: corporate influence on research and policy via the International Life Sciences Institute. Public Health Nutr. 2020;23(11):2032-2040. doi:10.1017/s1368980019005184
  10. De Wals P, Tairou F, Van Allen MI, et al. Reduction in neural-tube defects after folic acid fortification in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):135-142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa067103
  11. Health Canada. Healthy eating strategy. Published 2016.
  12. Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology. Obesity in Canada: A Whole-of-Society Approach for a Healthier Canada. Ottawa: Senate; 2016.
  13. Cullerton K, Adams J, Francis O, Forouhi N, White M. Building consensus on interactions between population health researchers and the food industry: two-stage, online, international Delphi study and stakeholder survey. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0221250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221250
  14. Cullerton K, Adams J, Forouhi N, Francis O, White M. What principles should guide interactions between population health researchers and the food industry? systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature. Obes Rev. 2019;20(8):1073-1084. doi:10.1111/obr.12851
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). Decision-Making Process and Tool. Geneva: WHO; 2017.
Volume 11, Issue 3
March 2022
Pages 383-385
  • Receive Date: 17 August 2020
  • Revise Date: 08 September 2020
  • Accept Date: 12 September 2020
  • First Publish Date: 01 March 2022