Achieving Food System Transformation: Insights From A Retrospective Review of Nutrition Policy (In)Action in High-Income Countries

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background
Comprehensive nutrition policies are required urgently to help transform food systems to more equitably deliver healthy, sustainable diets.
 
Methods
Literature was searched systematically for nutrition policies of the then 34 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) members as part of a scoping study. Recently, results were re-analysed, against the NOURISHING framework.
 
Results
Twenty-three nutrition policy documents were identified for 19 jurisdictions. Most policy actions focused on the behaviour change communication domain: all (100%) promoted consumption of ‘healthy’ choices. In the food environment domain, most policies included food labelling (84%), product reformulation (68%), providing healthy foods in public institutions (89%, mainly schools), and restricting food advertising (53%), largely through voluntary codes. Relatively few economic tools were being applied. There was very little focus on reducing consumption of ‘unhealthy’ food or drinks. Not all nutrition policy actions identified were covered by the NOURISHING framework.
 
Conclusion
The NOURISHING framework could be expanded to more comprehensively encompass the health and sustainability dimensions of food systems, eg, by detailing optimum governance arrangements. As recently as seven years ago, half of the most developed economies globally did not have a publicly available nutrition policy. Existing policies were dominated by conventional nutrition education approaches, while policy actions targeting food environments, and regulatory and legislative reforms, were rare. This is consistent with a neo-liberal approach centring individual responsibility. No examples of the multi-strategy, inter-sectoral, coordinated, evidence-based policies required to drive systemic transformation were identified. Therefore, it is not surprising that rates of obesity and diet-related conditions have continued to rise in these jurisdictions, nor that governments are currently off-track to deliver the systemic transformation required to meet relevant global health and sustainable development goals.

Keywords


  1. Swinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791-846. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32822-8
  2. HLPE. Nutrition and food systems. A Report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome: Committee on World Food Security; 2017.
  3. Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. Food Systems and Diets: Facing the Challenges of the 21st Century. London: Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition; 2016.
  4. Fanzo J, Covic N, Dobermann A, et al. A research vision for food systems in the 2020s: defying the status quo. Glob Food Sec. 2020;26:100397. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100397
  5. Mozaffarian D, Angell SY, Lang T, Rivera JA. Role of government policy in nutrition-barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. BMJ. 2018;361:k2426. doi:10.1136/bmj.k2426
  6. Harris J. Advocacy coalitions and the transfer of nutrition policy to Zambia. Health Policy Plan. 2019;34(3):207-215. doi:10.1093/heapol/czz024
  7. Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Exploring power and influence in nutrition policy in Australia. Obes Rev. 2016;17(12):1218-1225. doi:10.1111/obr.12459
  8. Development Initiatives. 2018 Global Nutrition Report: Shining a light to spur action on nutrition. Bristol, UK: Development Initiatives; 2018.
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Nutrition Policy Review: What Does it Take to Scale up Nutrition Action? Geneva: WHO; 2013.
  10. Reich MR, Balarajan Y. Political economy analysis for nutrition policy. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(12):e681-682. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70350-x
  11. Diaz-Bonilla E, Paz F, Biermayr-Jenzano P. Nutrition Policies and Interventions for Overweight and Obesity: A Review of Conceptual Frameworks and Classifications. LAC Working Paper 6. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2020.
  12. Australian Government Department of Health. National Nutrition Policy 2013. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/phd-nutrition-health.  Accessed December 10, 2019. Published 2013.
  13. World Cancer Research Fund. NOURISHING Framework. https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/policy-databases/nourishing-framework.  Accessed July 20, 2020. Published 2020.
  14. Hawkes C, Jewell J, Allen K. A food policy package for healthy diets and the prevention of obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases: the NOURISHING framework. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 2:159-168. doi:10.1111/obr.12098
  15. World Cancer Research Fund. Our Publications. https://www.wcrf.org/int/policy/our-publications.  Accessed March 2, 2020. Published 2019.
  16. Lee A, Baker P, Stanton R,  Friel S, O'Dea K, Weightman A. Scoping Study to Inform Development of the National Nutrition Policy for Australia. Released in response to a freedom of information (FOI) request, March 2016. http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20171113055450/http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/foi-074-15162013.
  17. Australian Government Department of Health. National Nutrition Policy. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/phd-nutrition-health.  Accessed July 20, 2020. Published 2019.
  18. Australian Government. Freedom of Information Act 1984. Compilation number 94, Title number C2019C00198. Australian Government; 2019.
  19. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares CB, Khalil H, Parker D. Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris E, ed. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual 2015. Joanna Briggs Institute; 2015:3-24.
  20. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0.  The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
  21. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  22. European Commission. EU Platform on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/platform/database/.  Accessed February, 2013.
  23. McMaster University. Health Evidence.  https://www.healthevidence.org/.  Accessed February, 2013.
  24. International Union for Health Promotion and Education (IUHPE). IUHPE website.  http://www.iuhpe.org.  Accessed February, 2013.
  25. National Institute for Health Research. Health Technology and Assessment Programme.  https://www.nihr.ac.uk/explore-nihr/funding-programmes/health-technology-assessment.htm.  Accessed February, 2013.
  26. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) website. http://www.nice.org.uk.  Accessed February, 2013.
  27. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) website. http://www.sign.ac.uk.  Accessed February, 2013.
  28. US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention website.  http://www.cdc.gov/.  Accessed February, 2013.
  29. World Health Organization (WHO).  http://www.who.int/en/.  Accessed February, 2013.
  30. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Database on the Implementation of Nutrition Action (GINA). https://extranet.who.int/nutrition/gina/en.  Accessed February, 2013.
  31. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.  http://www.fao.org/home/en/.  Accessed February, 2013.
  32. Commonwealth Department of Health Housing and Community Services. Food and Nutrition Policy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 1992.
  33. Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment. National Food and Health Plan for Belgium 2005-2010. Brussels: Federal Government of Belgium; 2005.
  34. The Secretariat for the Intersectoral Healthy Living Network and F/P/T Healthy Living Task Group and F/P/T Advisory Committee on Population Health and Health Security (ACPHHS). The Integrated Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy 2005. Government of Canada; 2005.
  35. The Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. Food Safety and Nutrition Strategy for 2010-2013. Prague:  Government of the Czech Republic; 2010.
  36. Government of Denmark. Healthy Throughout Life - The Targets and Strategies for the Public Health Policy of the Government of Denmark. Government of Denmark; 2003.
  37. National Board of Health, Center for Health Promotion and Prevention. National Action Plan Against Obesity: Recommendations and Perspectives. Copenhagen: National Board of Health Denmark; 2003.
  38. Cross-Government Obesity Unit, Department of Health and Department of Children, Schools and Families. Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives: A Cross-Government Strategy for England. London: UK Department of Health; 2008.
  39. Ministry of Health. National Programme for Nutrition and Health 2001-2005. Paris: Government of France; 2001.
  40. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Second National Nutrition and Health Programme 2006-2010. Paris: Government of France; 2006.
  41. Government of Hungary. Johan Bela' National Programme for the Decade of Health. Budapest: Government of Hungary; 2004.
  42. National Taskforce on Obesity. Obesity: The Policy Challenges – The Report of the National Taskforce on Obesity 2005. Dublin: Government of the Republic of Ireland; 2005.
  43. Ministry of Health. Health Behaviors: Promoting Physical Activity, Prevention and Treatment of Obesity, Healthful Nutrition. Jerusalem: Government of Israel; 2011.
  44. Ministry of Health. Guadagnare salute: Rendere facili le scelte salutari [Gaining Health Action Plan: Encouraging Healthy Choices]. Rome: Government of Italy; 2007.
  45. Cabinet Office. Basic Plan for Promotion of Shokuiku [Food Education]. Government of Japan; 2005.
  46. NZ Ministry of Health. Healthy Eating – Healthy Action: Oranga Kai – Oranga Pumau: Strategy Framework (HEHA Strategy). Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2004.
  47. NZ Ministry of Health. Healthy Eating – Healthy Action: Oranga Kai – Oranga Pumau: Implementation Plan: 2004-2010. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2003.
  48. Scottish Government. Healthy Eating, Active Living: An Action Plan to Improve Diet, Increase Physical Activity and Tackle Obesity, Scotland (2008-2011). Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2008.
  49. Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs. Estrategia NAOS: Spanish Strategy for Nutrition, Physical Activity and Prevention of Obesity. Government of Spain; 2005.
  50. Federal Office of Public Health. Swiss Nutrition Policy 2013-2016: Based on the Main Findings of the 6th Swiss Nutrition Report. Berne: Government of Switzerland; 2012.
  51. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020: Nutrition and Weight Status. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2010.
  52. National Prevention Council. National Prevention Strategy: America's Plan for Better Health and Wellness. Washington: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2011.
  53. The Nordic Council of Ministers for Fisheries and Aquaculture, Agriculture Food and Forestry (MR-FJLS), Nordic Council of Ministers for Health and Social Affairs (MR-S). Health, Food and Physical Activity: Nordic Plan of Action on Better Health and Quality of Life Through Diet and Physical Activity. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2006.
  54. WHO Regional Office for Europe. The First Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy, WHO European Region, 2000-2005. Copenhagen: WHO; 2001.
  55. WHO Regional Office for Europe. WHO European Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy 2007-2012. Copenhagen: WHO; 2008.
  56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Dietary Assessment: A Resource Guide to Method Selection and Application in Low Resource Settings. Rome: FAO; 2018.
  57. World Health Organization (WHO). Food and Nutrition Policies. https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/food_policy/en/.  Accessed November 20, 2019. Published
  58. Hawkes C, Smith TG, Jewell J, et al. Smart food policies for obesity prevention. Lancet. 2015;385(9985):2410-2421. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61745-1
  59. Swinburn B, Sacks G, Vandevijvere S, et al. INFORMAS (International Network for Food and Obesity/non-communicable diseases Research, Monitoring and Action Support): overview and key principles. Obes Rev. 2013;14 Suppl 1:1-12. doi:10.1111/obr.12087
  60. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016-2017: Country Progress in Creating Enabling Policy Environments for Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  61. Lehnert T, Sonntag D, Konnopka A, Riedel-Heller S, König HH. The long-term cost-effectiveness of obesity prevention interventions: systematic literature review. Obes Rev. 2012;13(6):537-553. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00980.x
  62. Vos T, Carter R, Barendregt J, et al. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness in Prevention (ACE–Prevention): Final Report. Melbourne: University of Queensland and Deakin University; 2010.
  63. Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Playing the policy game: a review of the barriers to and enablers of nutrition policy change. Public Health Nutr. 2016;19(14):2643-2653. doi:10.1017/s1368980016000677
  64. Baker P, Gill T, Friel S, Carey G, Kay A. Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study. Soc Sci Med. 2017;177:141-149. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.047
  65. Lencucha R, Thow AM. How Neoliberalism is shaping the supply of unhealthy commodities and what this means for NCD prevention. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2019;8(9):514-520. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2019.56
  66. World Health Organization (WHO). Addressing and Managing Conflicts of Interest in the Planning and Delivery of Nutrition Programmes at Country Level. Geneva: WHO; 2016.
  67. Heaver R. Strengthening Country Commitment to Human Development: Lessons from Nutrition. The World Bank; 2005.
  68. Baker P, Brown AD, Wingrove K, et al. Generating political commitment for ending malnutrition in all its forms: A system dynamics approach for strengthening nutrition actor networks. Obes Rev. 2019;20 Suppl 2:30-44. doi:10.1111/obr.12871
  69. Nutrition and Obesity Policy Research and Evaluation Network (NOPREN). https://nopren.org/.  Accessed August 3, 2020. Published 2020.
  70. Candel JJL, Biesbroek R. Policy integration in the EU governance of global food security. Food Secur. 2018;10(1):195-209. doi:10.1007/s12571-017-0752-5
  71. Allen LN, Nicholson BD, Yeung BYT, Goiana-da-Silva F. Implementation of non-communicable disease policies: a geopolitical analysis of 151 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(1):e50-e58. doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(19)30446-2
  72. Rivera Dommarco JA, González de Cosío T, García-Chávez CG, Colchero MA. The role of public nutrition research organizations in the construction, implementation and evaluation of evidence-based nutrition policy: two national experiences in Mexico. Nutrients. 2019;11(3). doi:10.3390/nu11030594
  73. Kwon J, Cameron AJ, Hammond D, et al. A multi-country survey of public support for food policies to promote healthy diets: findings from the International Food Policy Study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1205. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7483-9
  74. Rodríguez Osiac L, Cofré C, Pizarro T, et al. Using evidence-informed policies to tackle overweight and obesity in Chile. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017;41:e156. doi:10.26633/rpsp.2017.156
  75. Reyes M, Garmendia ML, Olivares S, Aqueveque C, Zacarías I, Corvalán C. Development of the Chilean front-of-package food warning label. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):906. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7118-1
  76. Taillie LS, Reyes M, Colchero MA, Popkin B, Corvalán C. An evaluation of Chile's Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: a before-and-after study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(2):e1003015. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003015
  77. OECD. The Heavy Burden of Obesity: The Economics of Prevention. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. doi:10.1787/67450d67-en
  78. Fuster M, Burrowes S, Cuadrado C, et al. Understanding policy change for obesity prevention: learning from sugar-sweetened beverages taxes in Mexico and Chile. Health Promot Int. 2020. doi:10.1093/heapro/daaa045
  79. Baker P, Machado P, Santos T, et al. Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev. 2020. doi:10.1111/obr.13126
  80. Vandevijvere S, Jaacks LM, Monteiro CA, et al. Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories. Obes Rev. 2019;20 Suppl 2:10-19. doi:10.1111/obr.12860
  81. Gerald J, Dorothy R, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. Food-PRICE: Food Policy Review and Intervention Cost-Effectiveness. https://www.food-price.org/.  Accessed July 20, 2020. Published 2019.
  82. Htenas AM. An Overview of Links Between Obesity and Food Systems: Implications for the Agriculture GP Agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank Group; 2017.
  83. Galli F, Prosperi P, Favilli E, D'Amico S, Bartolini F, Brunori G. How can policy processes remove barriers to sustainable food systems in Europe? contributing to a policy framework for agri-food transitions. Food Policy. 2020:101871. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101871
  84. IPES-Food. Unravelling the Food-Health Nexus: Addressing Practices, Political Economy, And Power Relations to Build Healthier Food Systems. The Global Alliance for the Future of Food, IPES-Food; 2017.
  85. INFORMAS. INFORMAS Food-EPI index. https://www.informas.org/food-epi/.  Accessed August 3, 2020. Published 2020.
  86. Friel S, Pescud M, Malbon E, et al. Using systems science to understand the determinants of inequities in healthy eating. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188872. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188872
  87. Development Initiatives. Global Nutrition Report 2020. https://globalnutritionreport.org/.   Accessed July 20, 2020. Published 2020.
  88. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Nutrition Policy Review 2016-2017: Country Progress in Creating Enabling Policy Environments for Promoting Healthy Diets and Nutrition. Geneva: WHO; 2018.
  89. World Health Organization (WHO). A Review of Nutrition Policies. Draft Global Nutrition Policy Review. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
  90. Capacci S, Mazzocchi M, Shankar B, et al. Policies to promote healthy eating in Europe: a structured review of policies and their effectiveness. Nutr Rev. 2012;70(3):188-200. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2011.00442.x
  91. California Obesity Prevention Program. 2010 California Obesity Prevention Plan: A Vision for Tomorrow, Strategic Actions for Today. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health; 2010.
  92. Kelly PM, Davies A, Greig AJ, Lee KK. Obesity prevention in a city state: lessons from New York City during the Bloomberg Administration. Front Public Health. 2016;4:60. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00060
  93. Queensland Public Health Forum. Eat Well Queensland 2002-2012: Smart Eating for a Healthier State. Brisbane: Queensland Public Health Forum; 2002.
  94. Galli F, Hebinck A, Carroll B. Addressing food poverty in systems: governance of food assistance in three European countries. Food Secur. 2018;10(6):1353-1370. doi:10.1007/s12571-018-0850-z
  95. Australian Taxation Office. Goods and Services Tax Industry Issues: Detailed Food List. https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/GST/In-detail/Your-industry/Food/Detailed-food-list/.  Accessed July 20, 2020. Published 2018.
  96. Lawrence MA, Dickie S, Woods JL. Do nutrient-based front-of-pack labelling schemes support or undermine food-based dietary guideline recommendations? lessons from the Australian Health Star Rating System. Nutrients. 2018;10(1). doi:10.3390/nu10010032

Articles in Press, Corrected Proof
Available Online from 19 October 2020
  • Receive Date: 08 March 2020
  • Revise Date: 12 August 2020
  • Accept Date: 28 September 2020