Can Labelling Create Transformative Food System Change for Human and Planetary Health? A Case Study of Meat

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

2 School of Agriculture and Food, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

3 School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

4 School of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background
One important way to transform food systems for human and planetary health would be to reduce the production and consumption of animals for food. The over-production and over-consumption of meat and dairy products is resource-intensive, energy-dense and creates public health and food equity risks, including the creation of superbugs and antimicrobial resistance, contamination and pollution of land and waterways, and injustice to animals and humans who work in the sector. Yet the continuing and expanding use of animals is entrenched in food systems. One policy response frequently suggested by parties from all sectors (industry, government and civil society) is voluntary or mandatory labelling reforms to educate consumers about the healthiness and sustainability of food products, and thus reduce demand. This paper evaluates the pitfalls and potentials of labelling as an incremental regulatory governance stepping-stone to transformative food system change.
 
Methods
We use empirical data from a study of the regulatory politics of animal welfare and environmental claims on Australian products together with an ecological regulation conceptual approach to critically evaluate the potential of labelling as a regulatory mechanism.
 
Results
We show that labelling is generally ineffective as a pathway to transformative food system change for three reasons: it does not do enough to redistribute power away from dominant actors to those harmed by the food system; it is vulnerable to greenwashing and reductionism; and it leads to market segmentation rather than collective political action.
 
Conclusion
We suggest the need for regulatory governance that is ecological by design. Labelling can only be effective when connected to a broader suite of measures to reduce overall production and consumption of meat. We conclude with some recommendations as to how public health advocates and policy entrepreneurs might strategically use and contest labelling and certification schemes to build support for transformative food system change and to avoid the regressive consequences of labelling.

Keywords

Full Text

 

"Watch the Special Issue Video Summary"

 

  Check the full list of "Political Economy of Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems" special issue here. 

 

References

  1. Hallström E, Röös E, Börjesson P. Sustainable meat consumption: a quantitative analysis of nutritional intake, greenhouse gas emissions and land use from a Swedish perspective. Food Policy. 2014;47:81-90. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.04.002
  2. McMichael AJ, Powles JW, Butler CD, Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1253-1263. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61256-2
  3. Nelson ME, Hamm MW, Hu FB, Abrams SA, Griffin TS. Alignment of healthy dietary patterns and environmental sustainability: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(6):1005-1025. doi:10.3945/an.116.012567
  4. Scherer L, Behrens P, Tukker A. Opportunity for a dietary win-win-win in nutrition, environment, and animal welfare. One Earth. 2019;1(3):349-360. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.020
  5. Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Rood T, et al. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe's meat and dairy intake. Glob Environ Change. 2014;26:196-205. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
  6. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447-492. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4
  7. Boogaard BK, Boekhorst LJS, Oosting SJ, Sørensen JT. Socio-cultural sustainability of pig production: citizen perceptions in the Netherlands and Denmark. Livest Sci. 2011;140(1):189-200. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.028
  8. Buller H, Roe E. Food and Animal Welfare. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2018.
  9. Harrison R. Animal Machines: The New Factory Farming Industry. London: Vincent Stuart Publishers; 1964.
  10. Campbell BM, Beare DJ, Bennett EM, et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol Soc. 2017;22(4):8. doi:10.5751/es-09595-220408
  11. Conijn JG, Bindraban PS, Schröder JJ, Jongschaap REE. Can our global food system meet food demand within planetary boundaries? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;251:244-256. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.06.001
  12. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP), GRAIN. Big Meat and Dairy's Supersized Climate Footprint. Berlin: IATP; 2017.
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, And Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. IPCC; 2019.
  14. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems. 2012;15(3):401-415. doi:10.1007/s10021-011-9517-8
  15. Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, McAlpine C, Boucher DH. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nat Clim Chang. 2014;4(1):2-5. doi:10.1038/nclimate2081
  16. Ekmekcioglu C, Wallner P, Kundi M, Weisz U, Haas W, Hutter HP. Red meat, diseases, and healthy alternatives: a critical review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58(2):247-261. doi:10.1080/10408398.2016.1158148
  17. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Red Meat and Processed Meat. Lyon, France: World Health Organization; 2015.
  18. Rouhani MH, Salehi-Abargouei A, Surkan PJ, Azadbakht L. Is there a relationship between red or processed meat intake and obesity? a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Obes Rev. 2014;15(9):740-748. doi:10.1111/obr.12172
  19. Destoumieux-Garzón D, Mavingui P, Boetsch G, et al. The one health concept: 10 years old and a long road ahead. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:14. doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00014
  20. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES-Food). COVID-19 and the Crisis in Food Systems: Symptoms, Causes, and Potential Solutions. Brussels, Belgium: IPES-Food; 2020.
  21. Dobson AP, Pimm SL, Hannah L, et al. Ecology and economics for pandemic prevention. Science. 2020;369(6502):379-381. doi:10.1126/science.abc3189  
  22. Allen J, Lavau S. 'Just-in-time' disease: biosecurity, poultry and power. J Cult Econ. 2015;8(3):342-360. doi:10.1080/17530350.2014.904243
  23. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO). World Livestock 2013: Changing Disease Landscapes. Rome: FAO; 2013.
  24. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food Systems (IPES-Food). Unravelling the Food-Health Nexus: Addressing Practices, Political Economy, and Power Relations to Build Healthier Food Systems. Brussels, Belgium: IPES-Food; 2017.
  25. Armenteras D, Negret P, Melgarejo LF, et al. Curb land grabbing to save the Amazon. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3(11):1497. doi:10.1038/s41559-019-1020-1
  26. Gilson EC. Vulnerability, relationality, and dependency: feminist conceptual resources for food justice. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2015;8(2):10-46. doi:10.3138/ijfab.8.2.10
  27. Holt Giménez E. A Foodie's Guide to Capitalism. NYU Press; 2017.
  28. Parker C, Johnson H. From food chains to food webs: regulating capitalist production and consumption in the food system. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2019;15:205-225. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042908
  29. Rockström J, Edenhofer O, Gaertner J, DeClerck F. Planet-proofing the global food system. Nat Food. 2020;1(1):3-5. doi:10.1038/s43016-019-0010-4
  30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Food Systems for Healthy Diets: Policy Guidance Note 12. Geneva: FAO; 2018.
  31. Garnett T, Godde C, Muller A, et al. Grazed and Confused? Ruminating on Cattle, Grazing Systems, Methane, Nitrous Oxide, The Soil Carbon Sequestration Question - And What it All Means for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. University of Oxford: Environmental Change Institute; 2017.
  32. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Rose D. Implications of Future Diet Scenarios on Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Center for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan; 2020.
  33. winburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791-846. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32822-8
  34. Ripple WJ, Wolf C, Newsome TM, Barnard P, Moomaw WR. World scientists’ warning of a climate emergency. Bioscience. 2020;70(1):8-12. doi:10.1093/biosci/biz088
  35. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Friends of the Earth Europe. Meat Atlas: Facts and Figures about the Animals We Eat. Berlin: Friends of the Earth Europe; 2014.
  36. Vranken L, Avermaete T, Petalios D, Mathijs E. Curbing global meat consumption: emerging evidence of a second nutrition transition. Environ Sci Policy. 2014;39:95-106. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.02.009
  37. Fuchs D, Di Giulio A, Glaab K, et al. Power: the missing element in sustainable consumption and absolute reductions research and action. J Clean Prod. 2016;132:298-307. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.006
  38. Lundström M. The political economy of meat. J Agric Environ Ethics Ethics. 2019;32(1):95-104. doi:10.1007/s10806-019-09760-9
  39. Sievert K, Lawrence M, Parker C, Baker P. Understanding the political challenge of red and processed meat reduction for healthy and sustainable food systems: a narrative review of the literature. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020; Forthcoming.
  40. Weis T. Confronting meatification. In: Katz-Rosene RM, Martin SJ, eds. Green Meat? Sustaining Eaters Animals and the Planet. McGill-Queen's University Press; 2020:29-42.
  41. Mehrabi Z, Gill M, van Wijk M, Herrero M, Ramankutty N. Livestock policy for sustainable development. Nat Food. 2020;1(3):160-165. doi:10.1038/s43016-020-0042-9
  42. Arcari P. Normalised, human-centric discourses of meat and animals in climate change, sustainability and food security literature. Agric Human Values. 2017;34(1):69-86. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9697-0
  43. Rödl MB. Marketing meat alternatives: meat myths and their replication in advertising for plant-based meat. In: Bogueva D, Marinova D, Raphaely T, eds. Handbook of Research on Social Marketing and Its Influence on Animal Origin Food Product Consumption. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2018:327-343.
  44. Lang T, Wu M, Caraher M. Meat and policy: charting a course through the complexity. In: D'Silva J, Webster J, eds. The Meat Crisis: Developing More Sustainable Production and Consumption. Earthscan Publications Ltd; 2010:254-274.
  45. Apostolidis C, McLeay F. Should we stop meating like this? reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy. 2016;65:74-89. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.11.002
  46. Harwatt H. Including animal to plant protein shifts in climate change mitigation policy: a proposed three-step strategy. Clim Policy. 2019;19(5):533-541. doi:10.1080/14693062.2018.1528965
  47. Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2018;360(6392):987-992. doi:10.1126/science.aaq0216
  48. Bowles N, Alexander S, Hadjikakou M. The livestock sector and planetary boundaries: a ‘limits to growth’ perspective with dietary implications. Ecol Econ. 2019;160:128-136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.033
  49. Camilleri AR, Larrick RP, Hossain S, Patino-Echeverri D. Consumers underestimate the emissions associated with food but are aided by labels. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(1):53-58. doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0354-z
  50. Chloupkova J, Svendsen GT, Zdechovsky T. A global meat tax: from big data to a double dividend. Agric Econ. 2018;64(6):256-264. doi:10.17221/270/2016-agricecon
  51. Giubilini A, Birkl P, Douglas T, Savulescu J, Maslen H. Taxing meat: taking responsibility for one's contribution to antibiotic resistance. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017;30(2):179-198. doi:10.1007/s10806-017-9660-0
  52. Brown KA, Harris F, Potter C, Knai C. The future of environmental sustainability labelling on food products. Lancet Planet Health. 2020;4(4):e137-e138. doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30074-7
  53. Evans A, Miele M. Food labelling as a response to political consumption. In: Keller M, Halkier B, Wilska TA, Truninger M, eds. Routledge Handbook on Consumption. Taylor & Francis; 2017:191-203.
  54. Frohlich X. The informational turn in food politics: the US FDA's nutrition label as information infrastructure. Soc Stud Sci. 2017;47(2):145-171. doi:10.1177/0306312716671223
  55. Guthman J. The polanyian way? voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode. 2007;39(3):456-478. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2007.00535.x
  56. Klintman M, Boström M. Framings of science and ideology: organic food labelling in the US and Sweden. Env Polit. 2004;13(3):612-634. doi:10.1080/09644010142000229061
  57. Parker C, Johnson H, Curll J. Consumer power to change the food system: a critical reading of food labels as governance spaces: the case of acai berry superfoods. Journal of Food Law and Policy. 2019;15:1.
  58. Roff RJ. Shopping for change? neoliberalizing activism and the limits to eating non-GMO. Agric Human Values. 2007;24(4):511-522. doi:10.1007/s10460-007-9083-z
  59. Scrinis G, Parker C. Front-of-pack food labeling and the politics of nutritional nudges. Law Policy. 2016;38(3):234-249. doi:10.1111/lapo.12058
  60. Miele M, Evans A. When foods become animals: ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption. Ethics Place Environ. 2010;13(2):171-190. doi:10.1080/13668791003778842
  61. Negowetti NR. Establishing and enforcing animal welfare labeling claims: Improving transparency and ensuring accountability. Journal of Animal and Natural Resource Law. 2018;14:131.
  62. Scrinis G, Parker C, Carey R. The Caged Chicken or the Free-Range Egg? The Regulatory and Market Dynamics of Layer-Hen Welfare in the UK, Australia and the USA. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2017;30(6):783-808.
  63. Centner TJ. Efforts to slacken antibiotic resistance: labeling meat products from animals raised without antibiotics in the United States. Sci Total Environ. 2016;563-564:1088-1094. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.082
  64. Hocknell S, Hughes A, Roe E, Keevil B, Wrigley N, Lowe M. Corporate Food Retailers, Meat Supply Chains, And the Responsibilities of Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance: Stakeholder Report 2018. Newcastle University; 2018.
  65. Apostolidis C, McLeay F. To meat or not to meat? comparing empowered meat consumers’ and anti-consumers’ preferences for sustainability labels. Food Qual Prefer. 2019;77:109-122. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.04.008
  66. Curtain F, Grafenauer S. Plant-based meat substitutes in the flexitarian age: an audit of products on supermarket shelves. Nutrients. 2019;11(11). doi:10.3390/nu11112603
  67. Holzer B. Political consumerism between individual choice and collective action: social movements, role mobilization and signalling. Int J Consum Stud. 2006;30(5):405-415. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00538.x
  68. Lawrence MA, Friel S, Wingrove K, James SW, Candy S. Formulating policy activities to promote healthy and sustainable diets. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18(13):2333-2340. doi:10.1017/s1368980015002529
  69. Parker C. The food label as governance space: free-range eggs and the fallacy of consumer choice. Recht der Werkelijkheid. 2014;35:101.
  70. Levi-Faur D. Regulatory capitalism and the reassertion of the public interest. Policy Soc. 2009;27(3):181-191. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.10.002
  71. Schneiberg M, Bartley T. Organizations, regulation, and economic behavior: regulatory dynamics and forms from the nineteenth to twenty-first century. Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2008;4:31-61. doi:10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172338
  72. Fligstein N, McAdam D. A political–cultural approach to the problem of strategic action. In: Courpasson D, Golsorkhi D, Sallaz J, eds. Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets. Vol 34. Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2012:287-316.
  73. Haines F, Macdonald K. Grappling with injustice: corporate crime, multinational business and interrogation of law in context. Theor Criminol. 2019. doi:10.1177/1362480619872267
  74. Abbott K, Snidal D. The governance triangle: regulatory standards institutions and the shadow of the state. In: Mattli W, Woods N, eds. The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2009.
  75. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  76. Cohen AJ. Transnational legal methodology and domestic markets for food. Transnational Legal Theory. 2018;9(3-4):361-370. doi:10.1080/20414005.2018.1578556
  77. Eberlein B, Abbott KW, Black J, Meidinger E, Wood S. Transnational business governance interactions: conceptualization and framework for analysis. Regul Gov. 2014;8(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/rego.12030
  78. Karassin O, Perez O. Shifting between public and private: the reconfiguration of global environmental regulation. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud. 2018;25(1):97-129.
  79. Parker C, Carey R, De Costa J, Scrinis G. Can the hidden hand of the market be an effective and legitimate regulator? The case of animal welfare under a labeling for consumer choice policy approach. Regul Gov. 2017;11(4):368-387. doi:10.1111/rego.12147
  80. Verbruggen P, Havinga T. Hybridization of food governance: an analytical framework. In: Hybridization of Food Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017.
  81. Scott C. Analysing Regulatory Space: Fragmented Resources and Institutional Design. Public Law. 2001(Summer):329-353. 
  82. Braithwaite V. Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Routledge; 2017.
  83. Silbey SS. The sociological citizen: pragmatic and relational regulation in law and organizations. Regul Gov. 2011;5(1):1-13. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01106.x
  84. Verbruggen P. Gorillas in the closet? public and private actors in the enforcement of transnational private regulation. Regul Gov. 2013;7(4):512-532. doi:10.1111/rego.12026
  85. Parker C, Haines F. An Ecological Approach to Regulatory Studies? J Law Soc. 2018;45(1):136-155.
  86. Parker C, Haines F, Boehm L. The promise of ecological regulation: the case of intensive meat. Jurimetrics. 2018;59:15-42.
  87. Gough I. Heat, Greed and Human Need: Climate Change, Capitalism and Sustainable Wellbeing. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017.
  88. Light SE. The law of the corporation as environmental law. Stanford Law Rev. 2019;71:137.
  89. Bartley T, Koos S, Samel H, Setrini G, Summers N. Looking Behind the Label: Global Industries and the Conscientious Consumer. Indiana University Press; 2015.
  90. Micheletti M, Stolle D. Sustainable citizenship and the new politics of consumption. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2012;644(1):88-120. doi:10.1177/0002716212454836
  91. Shaw D, Black I. Market based political action: a path to sustainable development? Sustain Dev. 2010;18(6):385-397. doi:10.1002/sd.415
  92. Carey R, Parker C, Scrinis G. Capturing the meaning of “free range”: The contest between producers, supermarkets and consumers for the higher welfare egg label in Australia. J Rural Stud. 2017;54:266-275.
  93. Parker C, Carey R, Scrinis G. The meat in the sandwich: welfare labelling, political consumerism and the governance of meat chicken production in Australia. J law Soc. 2018: In Press. 
  94. Parker C, Carey R, Scrinis G. The Consumer Labelling Turn in Farmed Animal Welfare Politics: From the Margins of Animal Advocacy to Mainstream Supermarket Shelves. In: Philipov M, Kirkwood K, eds. Alternative Food Politics: From the Margins to the Mainstream.Routledge; 2018:58.
  95. Carey R, Parker C, Scrinis G. How free is sow-stall free? Incremental regulatory reform and industry co-optation of animal activism. Law and Policy. 2020:42(3):284-309.
  96. Scientific Veterinary Committee. The Welfare of Intensively Kept Pigs. Brussels: European Commission; 1997.
  97. Micheletti M. Political Virtue and Shopping: Inviduals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. Palgrave Macmillan; 2003.
  98. Parker C, Brunswick C, Kotey J. The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers? J Bioeth Inq. 2013;10(2):165-186. doi:10.1007/s11673-013-9448-5
  99. Friedmann H. From colonialism to green capitalism: social movements and the emergence of food regimes. In: Buttel F, McMichael P, eds. New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development. London: Elsevier; 2005:227-264.
  100. Fourcade M, Healy K. Moral views of market society. Annu Rev Sociol. 2007;33:285-311. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131642
  101. Richards C, Lawrence G, Burch D. Supermarkets and agro-industrial foods: the strategic manufacturing of consumer trust. Food Cult Soc. 2011;14(1):29-47. doi:10.2752/175174411x12810842291146
  102. Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica. 2008;50(1):S1. doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-s1-s1
  103. Sørensen JT, Fraser D. On-farm welfare assessment for regulatory purposes: Issues and possible solutions. Livest Sci. 2010;131(1):1-7. doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2010.02.025
  104. Swanson JC, Lee Y, Thompson PB, Bawden R, Mench JA. Integration: valuing stakeholder input in setting priorities for socially sustainable egg production. Poult Sci. 2011;90(9):2110-2121. doi:10.3382/ps.2011-01340
  105. Denver S, Sandøe P, Christensen T. Consumer preferences for pig welfare–Can the market accommodate more than one level of welfare pork? Meat Sci. 2017;129:140-146. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.02.018
  106. Miele M, Lever J. Improving animal welfare in Europe: cases of comparative bio-sustainabilities. In: Marsden T, Morley A, eds. Sustainable Food Systems: Building a New Paradigm. Routledge; 2014:143-165.
  107. Kemmerer L. The Interconnected Nature of Anymal and Earth Activism. Am Behav Sci. 2019;63(8):1061-1079. doi:10.1177/0002764219830460
  108. Freeman CP. Framing Farming: Communication Strategies for Animal Rights. Brill; 2016.
  109. Evans BL. Animal Cruelty, Discourse, And Power: A Study of Problematisations in the Live Export Policy Debates [dissertation]. Queensland University of Technology; 2018.
  110. Guthman J. Agrarian Dreams: The Paradox of Organic Farming in California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004.
  111. Haedicke MA. Organizing Organic: Conflict and Compromise in an Emerging Market. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2016.
  112. Lang T. From ‘value-for-money’ to ‘values-for-money’? ethical food and policy in Europe. Environ Plan A. 2010;42(8):1814-1832. doi:10.1068/a4258
  113. Curll J, Parker C, MacGregor C, Petersen A. Unlocking the energy of the Amazon? the need for a food fraud policy approach to the regulation of anti-ageing health claims on superfood labelling. Fed Law Rev. 2016;44(3):419-449. doi:10.1177/0067205x1604400304
  114. Parker C, De Costa J. Misleading the ethical consumer: The regulation of free-range egg labelling. Melbourne University Law Review. 2015;39:895. 
  115. Dixon J, Banwell C. Re-embedding trust: unravelling the construction of modern diets. Crit Public Health. 2004;14(2):117-131. doi:10.1080/09581590410001725364
  116. Gotlieb MR, Thorson K. Connected political consumers: transforming personalized politics among youth into broader repertoires of action. J Youth Stud. 2017;20(8):1044-1061. doi:10.1080/13676261.2017.1305101
  117. Dana DA, Nadler J. Regulation, public attitudes, and private governance. J Empir Leg Stud. 2019;16(1):69-93. doi:10.1111/jels.12209
  118. Boehm L. A public appetite for poultry welfare regulation reform: Why higher welfare labelling is not enough. Alternative Law Journal. 2018;43(4):238-243. doi:10.1177/1037969x18800398
  119. Baker P, Friel S, Kay A, Baum F, Strazdins L, Mackean T. What enables and constrains the inclusion of the social determinants of health inequities in government policy agendas? a narrative review. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(2):101-111. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2017.130
  120. Parker C, Scrinis G. Out of the cage and into the barn: supermarket power food system governance and the regulation of free range eggs. Griffith Law Rev. 2014;23(2):318-347. doi:10.1080/10383441.2014.980879
  121. Ilbery B, Morris C, Buller H, Maye D, Kneafsey M. Product, process and place: an examination of food marketing and labelling schemes in Europe and North America. European Urban and Regional Studies. 2005;12(2):116-132. doi:10.1177/0969776405048499
  122. Parker C. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-Regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
  123. Parker C. From Responsive Regulation to Ecological Compliance: Meta-regulation and the Existential Challenge of Corporate Compliance. In: van Rooij B, Sokol D, eds. Cambridge Handbook of Compliance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020: In Press.
  124. Boström M, Klintman M. State-centered versus nonstate-driven organic food standardization: a comparison of the US and Sweden. Agricu Human Values. 2006;23(2):163-180. doi:10.1007/s10460-005-6099-0
  125. Miele M, Lever J. Improving animal welfare in Europe. In: Marsden T, Morley A, eds. Sustainable Food Systems: Building a New Paradigm. London: Routledge; 2014:143-165.
  126. Michalopoulos T, Hogeveen H, Heuvelink E, Oude Lansink AGJM. Public multi-criteria assessment for societal concerns and gradual labelling. Food Policy. 2013;40:97-108. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.12.010
  127. Heerwagen LR, Mørkbak MR, Denver S, Sandøe P, Christensen T. The role of quality labels in market-driven animal welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2015;28(1):67-84. doi:10.1007/s10806-014-9521-z
  128. Smith G, Wales C. The theory and practice of citizens' juries. Policy Polit. 1999;27(3):295-308. doi:10.1332/030557399782453118
  129. Stirling A, Mayer S. A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: a multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 2001;19(4):529-555. doi:10.1068/c8s
  130. Lambek NC, Claeys P, Wong A, Brilmayer L. Rethinking Food Systems: Structural Challenges, New Strategies and the Law. Springer Science & Business Media; 2014.

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 May 2020
  • Revise Date: 14 November 2020
  • Accept Date: 18 November 2020
  • First Publish Date: 08 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics