Evaluation of Pharmacovigilance System in Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center, and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

2 National Institute for Medical Research Development, Tehran, Iran

3 Department for Assessment and Control of Prescribing and Use of Medicines and Health Products, Food and Drug Administration, Tehran, Iran

4 International Society of Pharmacovigilance, London, UK

5 Pharmacovigilance Consulting, Uppsala, Sweden

6 Deceased August 14, 2020

Abstract

Background
Evaluating a pharmacovigilance system helps identify its deficiencies and could facilitate measures to remedy and improve the quantity and quality of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports and other opportunities for pharmacovigilance systems strengthening. This study aimed to evaluate the status of pharmacovigilance in Iran using the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance indicators with the prospect of identifying the gaps and areas for improvement.
 
Methods
This study was conducted in 2 parts. The first part included a secondary analysis of the national data obtained from the Iranian National Pharmacovigilance Center (PVC) using a structured data collection form based on WHO core pharmacovigilance indicators. In the second part, a 3-month prospective study was carried out to investigate 2 outcome indicators, ie, length of stay and costs of medicine-related hospitalization in all patients of 2 main referral hospitals in the southeast and north of Iran.
 
Results
Iran has a PVC with national policy, trained staff, and a statutory budget. In 2017, the number of ADR reports was 15.0 per 100 000 population, and 262 signals were detected during the preceding 5 years. The average length of stay and costs of medicine-related hospitalization were 5 days and US$817.2 in Afzalipour hospital and 6.6 days and US$306.7 in Razi hospital, respectively. The status of pharmacovigilance in the Iranian public health programs (PHPs) is unknown, and most of the indicators could not be assessed.
 
Conclusion
A robust pharmacovigilance system is a pivotal part of the overall medicines regulatory system. The Iranian pharmacovigilance system has relatively the proper structural condition. Though the underreporting of ADRs, especially medicine-related deaths, is an important issue, and some indicators’ status was unclear. The Iranian pharmacovigilance program requires a higher prioritization, particularly in the PHPs, a greater allocation of resources, and cross-sectoral cooperation to bolster and achieve the pharmacovigilance objectives.

Keywords

References

  1. Linnér L, Eriksson I, Persson M, Wettermark B. Forecasting drug utilization and expenditure: ten years of experience in Stockholm. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):410. doi:10.1186/s12913-020-05170-0
  2. Qato DM. Current state of pharmacovigilance in the Arab and Eastern Mediterranean region: results of a 2015 survey. Int J Pharm Pract. 2018;26(3):210-221. doi:10.1111/ijpp.12372
  3. Kabore L, Millet P, Fofana S, Berdai D, Adam C, Haramburu F. Pharmacovigilance systems in developing countries: an evaluative case study in Burkina Faso. Drug Saf. 2013;36(5):349-358. doi:10.1007/s40264-013-0043-9
  4. Amin S, Mishra V, Mira D, Rajesh S. Pattern of adverse drug reactions and its potential impact on drug resistant tuberculosis patients at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Western India. Clin J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2018;1(1):1004.
  5. World Health Organization (WHO). Minimum Requirements for A Functional Pharmacovigilance System. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js23393en/.  Published 2010.
  6. World Health Organization (WHO). The Importance of Pharmacovigilance: Safety Monitoring of Medicinal Products. Geneva: WHO; 2002.
  7. Nwokike J, Joshi M. Pharmacovigilance in Rwanda: A Systems Analysis. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js18258en/. Published 2009.
  8. Moscou K, Kohler JC. Matching safety to access: global actors and pharmacogovernance in Kenya- a case study. Global Health. 2017;13(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12992-017-0232-x
  9. Nwokike J, Ludeman E, Thumm M. Comparative Analysis of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Five Asian Countries. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js21335en/. Published 2013.
  10. Maigetter K, Pollock AM, Kadam A, Ward K, Weiss MG. Pharmacovigilance in India, Uganda and South Africa with reference to WHO's minimum requirements. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(5):295-305. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.55
  11. Bandekar MS, Anwikar SR, Kshirsagar NA. Quality check of spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting forms of different countries. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(11):1181-1185. doi:10.1002/pds.2004
  12. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
  13. Anton C, Cox AR, Ferner RE. Improving follow-up rates in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: effectiveness of a targeted letter used by a regional centre in the UK. Drug Saf. 2009;32(12):1135-1140. doi:10.2165/11318940-000000000-00000
  14. Chang F, Xi Y, Zhao J, Zhang X, Lu Y. A time series analysis of the effects of financial incentives and mandatory clinical applications as interventions to improve spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting by hospital medical staff in China. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(6):1316-1321. doi:10.1111/jep.12780
  15. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators: A Practical Manual for the Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Systems. WHO; 2015.
  16. Olsson S, Pal SN, Stergachis A, Couper M. Pharmacovigilance activities in 55 low-and middle-income countries: a questionnaire-based analysis. Drug Saf. 2010;33(8):689-703. doi:10.2165/11536390-000000000-00000
  17. Pirmohamed M, Atuah KN, Dodoo AN, Winstanley P. Pharmacovigilance in developing countries. BMJ. 2007;335(7618):462. doi:10.1136/bmj.39323.586123.BE
  18. Hoffmann E, Fouretier A, Vergne C, Bertram D. Pharmacovigilance regulatory requirements in Latin America. Pharmaceut Med. 2012;26(3):153-164. doi:10.1007/bf03262389
  19. Opadeyi AO, Fourrier-Réglat A, Isah AO. Assessment of the state of pharmacovigilance in the South-South zone of Nigeria using WHO pharmacovigilance indicators. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2018;19(1):27. doi:10.1186/s40360-018-0217-2
  20. Strengthening Pharmaceutical Systems (SPS) Program. Indicator-Based Pharmacovigilance Assessment Tool: Manual for Conducting Assessments in Developing Countries. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js21303en/. Accessed March 31, 2020. Published 2009.
  21. Vessal G, Mardani Z, Mollai M. Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pharmacists to adverse drug reaction reporting in Iran. Pharm World Sci. 2009;31(2):183-187. doi:10.1007/s11096-008-9276-6
  22. Hamedivafa F, Peiravian F. A survey of knowledge, attitude and practice of nurses towards pharmacovigilance in teaching hospital, Qazvin-Iran. Res Pharm Sci. 2012;7(5):S863.
  23. Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Karami Matin B, Mahboubi M, Jalilian F. Factors related with adverse drug reaction reporting: a cross-sectional study among pharmacists in the West of Iran. Arvand J Health Med Sci. 2016;1(1):43-49.
  24. Hanafi S, Torkamandi H, Hayatshahi A, Gholami K, Shahmirzadi NA, Javadi MR. An educational intervention to improve nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice toward reporting of adverse drug reactions. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014;19(1):101-106.
  25. Peymani P, Tabrizi R, Afifi S, et al. Knowledge, attitude and practice of General Practitioners towards adverse drug reaction reporting in South of Iran, Shiraz (Pharmacoepidemiology report). Int J Risk Saf Med. 2016;28(1):25-31. doi:10.3233/jrs-160670
  26. Namazi S, Borhani-Haghighi A, Karimzadeh I. Adverse reactions to antiepileptic drugs in epileptic outpatients: a cross-sectional study in Iran. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2011;34(2):79-83. doi:10.1097/WNF.0b013e318210ece0
  27. Akhavan Sepahi M, Movahed Z, Heydari H, Shirkhodai M, Shokrollahi MR. Surveillance of adverse drug reaction in hospitalized children, a cross sectional study from Qom province, Iran. Life Sci J. 2013;10(12s):122-125.
  28. Pourseyed S, Fattahi F, Pourpak Z, et al. Adverse drug reactions in patients in an Iranian department of internal medicine. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(2):104-110. doi:10.1002/pds.1663
  29. Mohebbi N, Shalviri G, Salarifar M, Salamzadeh J, Gholami K. Adverse drug reactions induced by cardiovascular drugs in cardiovascular care unit patients. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(9):889-894. doi:10.1002/pds.1916
  30. Baniasadi S, Namdar R, Fahimi F. Development of an adverse drug reaction bulletin in a teaching hospital. Formulary. 2009;44(11):333-335.
  31. Baniasadi S, Fahimi F, Shalviri G. Developing an adverse drug reaction reporting system at a teaching hospital. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2008;102(4):408-411. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00217.x
  32. Baniasadi S, Habibi M, Haghgoo R, et al. Increasing the number of adverse drug reactions reporting: the role of clinical pharmacy residents. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(1):291-297.
  33. Shalviri G, Valadkhani M, Dinarvand R. Ten years pharmacovigilance activities in Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2009;38(Suppl 1):162-165.
  34. Javidnikoo N, Karimi-Ghavanloo M, Kheirandish M. Report of Adverse Drug Reaction and Medication Error in 2016 and 2017. Razi Drug Monthly; 2019.
  35. Hanafi S, Torkamandi H, Hayatshahi A, Gholami K, Javadi M. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of nurse regarding adverse drug reaction reporting. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012;17(1):21-25.
  36. Etminani-Isfahani M, Mousavi S, Rakhshan A, Assarian M, Kuti L, Eslami K. Adverse drug reactions: knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacy students. J Pharm Care. 2013;1(4):145-148.
  37. Mirbaha F, Shalviri G, Yazdizadeh B, Gholami K, Majdzadeh R. Perceived barriers to reporting adverse drug events in hospitals: a qualitative study using theoretical domains framework approach. Implement Sci. 2015;10:110. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0302-5
  38. Afifi S, Maharloui N, Peymani P, et al. Adverse drug reactions reporting: pharmacists' knowledge, attitude and practice in Shiraz, Iran. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2014;26(3):139-145. doi:10.3233/jrs-140620
  39. Edwards IR, Biriell C. Harmonisation in pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf. 1994;10(2):93-102. doi:10.2165/00002018-199410020-00001
  40. Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC). The Use of the WHO-UMC System for Standardised Case Causality Assessment. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOcausality_assessment.pdf.  Accessed March 30, 2020. Published 2018.
  41. Aghaei Hashjin A, Delgoshaei B, Kringos DS, Tabibi SJ, Manouchehri J, Klazinga NS. Implementing hospital quality assurance policies in Iran: balancing licensing, annual evaluation, inspections and quality management systems. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2015;28(4):343-355. doi:10.1108/ijhcqa-03-2014-0034
  42. Allabi AC, Nwokike J. A situational analysis of pharmacovigilance system in Republic of Benin. J Pharmacovigil. 2014;2(4):136. doi:10.4172/2329-6887.1000136
  43. Marcelo J. Safety of Medicinal Products in the Philippines: Assessment of the Pharmacovigilance System and its Performance. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/en/m/abstract/Js22350en/.  Accessed March 31, 2020. Published 2013.
  44. Cerruti L, Lebel D, Van Hees T, et al. Pilot study about hospital pharmacy residents’perception of pharmacovigilance in Belgium, France, Canada and Switzerland. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2015;22(2):e179-e188.
  45. Hartman J, Härmark L, van Puijenbroek E. A global view of undergraduate education in pharmacovigilance. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(7):891-899. doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2237-z
  46. Ampadu HH, Hoekman J, Arhinful D, Amoama-Dapaah M, Leufkens HGM, Dodoo ANO. Organizational capacities of national pharmacovigilance centres in Africa: assessment of resource elements associated with successful and unsuccessful pharmacovigilance experiences. Global Health. 2018;14(1):109. doi:10.1186/s12992-018-0431-0
  47. Abiri OT, Johnson WCN. Pharmacovigilance systems in resource-limited settings: an evaluative case study of Sierra Leone. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2019;12(1):13. doi:10.1186/s40545-019-0173-2
  48. Olsson S, Pal SN, Dodoo A. Pharmacovigilance in resource-limited countries. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015;8(4):449-460. doi:10.1586/17512433.2015.1053391
  49. van Eekeren R, Rolfes L, Koster AS, et al. What future healthcare professionals need to know about pharmacovigilance: introduction of the WHO PV core curriculum for university teaching with focus on clinical aspects. Drug Saf. 2018;41(11):1003-1011. doi:10.1007/s40264-018-0681-z
  50. Goel D, Farooq M. Impact of educational intervention on knowledge, attitude and practice of pharmacovigilance among interns. Adv Hum Biol. 2017;7(2):75-79. doi:10.4103/aihb.aihb_7_17
  51. Moore TJ, Furberg CD, Mattison DR, Cohen MR. Completeness of serious adverse drug event reports received by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2014. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(6):713-718. doi:10.1002/pds.3979
  52. Srba J, Descikova V, Vlcek J. Adverse drug reactions: analysis of spontaneous reporting system in Europe in 2007-2009. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68(7):1057-1063. doi:10.1007/s00228-012-1219-4
  53. Guo XJ, Ye XF, Wang XX, et al. Reporting patterns of adverse drug reactions over recent years in China: analysis from publications. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14(2):191-198. doi:10.1517/14740338.2015.985647
  54. Motola D, Melis M, Lo Bianco S, Buccellato E, Biagi C, Vaccheri A. Ten years of pharmacovigilance in Italy: the experience of Emilia-Romagna region in the monitoring of drug's safety profile. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(7):867-873. doi:10.1517/14740338.2014.916687
  55. Kopečná E, Deščíková V, Vlček J, Mladá J. Adverse drug reaction reporting in the Czech Republic 2005-2009. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33(4):683-689. doi:10.1007/s11096-011-9527-9
  56. Wong SX, Tham MY, Goh CL, Cheong HH, Chan SY. Spontaneous cutaneous adverse drug reaction reports-an analysis of a 10-year dataset in Singapore. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2019;7(2):e00469. doi:10.1002/prp2.469
  57. Ozcan G, Aykac E, Kasap Y, Nemutlu NT, Sen E, Aydinkarahaliloglu ND. Adverse drug reaction reporting pattern in Turkey: analysis of the national database in the context of the first pharmacovigilance legislation. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2016;3(1):33-43. doi:10.1007/s40801-015-0054-1
  58. Ermias A, Gurmesa G, Mesfin M, Mengistu A. Adverse drug reaction monitoring in Ethiopia: analysis of case reports, 2002-2007. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2011;25(2):168-173.
  59. Barry A, Olsson S, Minzi O, et al. Comparative assessment of the national pharmacovigilance systems in East Africa: Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda and Tanzania. Drug Saf. 2020;43(4):339-350. doi:10.1007/s40264-019-00898-z
  60. Shepherd G, Mohorn P, Yacoub K, May DW. Adverse drug reaction deaths reported in United States vital statistics, 1999-2006. Ann Pharmacother. 2012;46(2):169-175. doi:10.1345/aph.1P592
  61. Oosterhuis I, van Hunsel FP, van Puijenbroek EP. Expectations for feedback in adverse drug reporting by healthcare professionals in the Netherlands. Drug Saf. 2012;35(3):221-232. doi:10.2165/11594910-000000000-00000
  62. Vial T. French pharmacovigilance: missions, organization and perspectives. Therapie. 2016;71(2):143-150. doi:10.1016/j.therap.2016.02.029
  63. Maigetter K, Pollock AM, Kadam A, Ward K, Weiss MG. Pharmacovigilance in India, Uganda and South Africa with reference to WHO's minimum requirements. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(5):295-305. doi:10.15171/ijhpm.2015.55
  64. Santoro A, Genov G, Spooner A, Raine J, Arlett P. Promoting and protecting public health: how the European Union pharmacovigilance system works. Drug Saf. 2017;40(10):855-869. doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0572-8
  65. Alshammari TM, Alshakka M, Aljadhey H. Pharmacovigilance system in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2017;25(3):299-305. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2016.09.008
  66. Chan CL, Ang PS, Li SC. A survey on pharmacovigilance activities in Asean and selected non-Asean countries, and the use of quantitative signal detection algorithms. Drug Saf. 2017;40(6):517-530. doi:10.1007/s40264-017-0510-9
  67. Farcaş A, Măhălean A, Bulik NB, Leucuta D, Mogoșan C. New safety signals assessed by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee at EU level in 2014-2017. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2018;11(10):1045-1051. doi:10.1080/17512433.2018.1526676
  68. Suwankesawong W, Dhippayom T, Tan-Koi WC, Kongkaew C. Pharmacovigilance activities in ASEAN countries. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(9):1061-1069. doi:10.1002/pds.4023
  69. Hoogervorst-Schilp J, Langelaan M, Spreeuwenberg P, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C. Excess length of stay and economic consequences of adverse events in Dutch hospital patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:531. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1205-5
  70. Hug BL, Keohane C, Seger DL, Yoon C, Bates DW. The costs of adverse drug events in community hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012;38(3):120-126. doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38016-1
  71. Geer MI, Koul PA, Tanki SA, Shah MY. Frequency, types, severity, preventability and costs of Adverse Drug Reactions at a tertiary care hospital. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2016;81:323-334. doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2016.04.011
  72. Natanaelsson J, Hakkarainen KM, Hägg S, et al. Direct and indirect costs for adverse drug events identified in medical records across care levels, and their distribution among payers. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017;13(6):1151-1158. doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.11.008
  73. Poudel DR, Acharya P, Ghimire S, Dhital R, Bharati R. Burden of hospitalizations related to adverse drug events in the USA: a retrospective analysis from large inpatient database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(6):635-641. doi:10.1002/pds.4184
  74. Khan LM. Comparative epidemiology of hospital-acquired adverse drug reactions in adults and children and their impact on cost and hospital stay--a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(12):1985-1996. doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1563-z
  75. Rottenkolber D, Schmiedl S, Rottenkolber M, et al. Adverse drug reactions in Germany: direct costs of internal medicine hospitalizations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011;20(6):626-634. doi:10.1002/pds.2118
  76. Pattanaik S, Dhamija P, Malhotra S, Sharma N, Pandhi P. Evaluation of cost of treatment of drug-related events in a tertiary care public sector hospital in Northern India: a prospective study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;67(3):363-369. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03346.x
  77. Patel KJ, Kedia MS, Bajpai D, Mehta SS, Kshirsagar NA, Gogtay NJ. Evaluation of the prevalence and economic burden of adverse drug reactions presenting to the medical emergency department of a tertiary referral centre: a prospective study. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2007;7:8. doi:10.1186/1472-6904-7-8
  78. Wilbur K. Pharmacovigilance in the Middle East: a survey of 13 Arabic-speaking countries. Drug Saf. 2013;36(1):25-30. doi:10.1007/s40264-012-0001-y
  79. Bate A, Beckmann J, Dodoo A, et al. Developing a Crowdsourcing Approach and Tool for Pharmacovigilance Education Material Delivery. Drug Saf. 2017;40(3):191-199. doi:10.1007/s40264-016-0495-9
  80. Hans M, Gupta SK. Comparative evaluation of pharmacovigilance regulation of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India and the need for global harmonized practices. Perspect Clin Res. 2018;9(4):170-174. doi:10.4103/picr.PICR_89_17
  81. Khalili M, Mesgarpour B, Sharifi H, Daneshvar Dehnavi S, Haghdoost AA. Interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting: a scoping review. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(9):965-992. doi:10.1002/pds.4966
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume 11, Issue 7
July 2022
Pages 990-1000

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 06 June 2020
  • Revise Date: 26 October 2020
  • Accept Date: 28 November 2020
  • First Publish Date: 14 December 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics